HereditaryPrincess
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2012
- Messages
- 13,865
- City
- London
- Country
- United Kingdom
I've seen that picture before, but I think my picture's a different one. Thanks for the pic, anyway, it's such a lovely one.
HereditaryPrincess said:I've seen that picture before, but I think my picture's a different one. Thanks for the pic, anyway, it's such a lovely one.
Both my grandmothers were pregnant when George VI died. My dad was born on April 22nd and my mom on August 1st. My parents both celebrated their 60th birthdays this year! Neither remembers the coronation as they were just babies at the time (Dad was just over 13 months and Mom was 10 months).
The Queen will make broadcasting history by appearing in 3D for the first time when she delivers her Christmas message.
Viewers will need special glasses to watch the monarch in all her technological glory unless they have a new 3D television set, which went on sale this year.
Read more: Queen to make TV history with 3D Christmas message | Mail Online
A question I always have when reading such articles from the British tabloid sites, is why are the readers' comments underneath for the most part so negative..? Are republicans more eager to comment? do they read more the newspapers? Or are they more in number than what we are officially told?
..
The comment section of the DM is a complete disaster zone. Anyone looking at those comments to make an assessment of public opinion on the royals will not get an accurate picture. Just the other day a poll showed that 80% of the British population supports the monarchy.
I just hope people from overseas don't think those DM comments are reflective of the wider British population. We're not all odious, xenophobic, sexist, racist whingers who weren't taught how to spell, despite evidence to the contrary on that site.
I understand the point that the comments of the viewers in a particular site do not express the majority,but it seems to me that whenever I go over links with royal news from british media, the comments underneath are overwhelmingly of that kind -ironic and antimonarchist. That is to say, it's certainly not a DM symptom.. This is the reason I wondered why the pattern of such anti-royal comments in public forums in such numbers..
See another example here -from yahoo.uk:
UK names slice of Antarctica "Queen Elizabeth Land" - Yahoo! News UK
Sixty years ago, at the age of 26, Princess Elizabeth found herself unexpectedly saddled with the burdens and responsibilities of the throne
I've seen this elsewhere and I agree that it is wonderfully done.This may belong somewhere else, but it is a tribute to HM from infancy to latest Jubliee. Wonderfully done...Queen Elisabeth Morphing
Wild Speculation Involved In What Royals Might Wear to Westminster Coronation Ceremony