texankitcat
Serene Highness
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,060
- City
- Dallas
- Country
- United States
I haven’t been able to watch the interview yet since I am in the US and can’t get BBC One. If anyone of any other way to see it, please let know.
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.
While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
but that's what Andy seems to have been doing. And there have been rumours and questions flyng around for some time about his expensive lifestyle and Fergie's and people askng how it is funded? So the queen and other royals must be aware of the talk.. and IMO they should have kept an eye on Andrew and asked a few hard questions some years ago...
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.
While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
Is it possible that he could have remembered or looked up her name from the interview in 2011 in which she first publicly described meeting him through Jeffrey Epstein?
It is possible, I didn't find those articles in my first pass through (and 2011 was before I was royal-watching) but I don't know if he'd be able to say definitively Jane Doe 3 was Roberts
Well, who released that personal communication between HRH The Duke of York and Epstein's purported pimp Maxwell?
Perhaps the email was obtained during discovery in the civil case that Ghislaine Maxwell recently settled w/ Ms. Roberts?Well, who released that personal communication between HRH The Duke of York and Epstein's purported pimp Maxwell?
That was my thought as well. This email just confirms that by 2015 he wanted more information because he had been accused. He didn't randomly start sending an email enquiring information about a teenager he met about 10 years earlier.
The issue in question appears to be timing. Andrew sent out the email at 5:50 am on 1/3/15, although we don't know for what timezone.
While I can't get an exact timeline, some cursory examination shows that while Roberts gave her affidavit on 1/2/15, her name was not known to the public until the next day. This is why the timestamp is important: if Andrew sent that message before Virginia Roberts Giuffre was confirmed as Jane Doe 3 then (unless he can prove someone in the palace was tipped off to her name before the press) his "I don't know her" alibi goes up in smoke.
He wont become a social pariah. He will always find people who will hang round with him, in spite of his charities giving him the push.. because of his social status..I hope that Andrew will become a total pariah, socially and in business. That it the only thing that will really hurt him.
Most Americans (as in the vast majority) will care less about Trump's connections to a British Royal or his defense of one...if he actually tries to defend him.
LaRae
This is about lies. Bold-faced lies. These men are lying about any connection they have with Epstein. Trump knows what’s going down with Andrew over his connection with Epstein, so Trump (not surprised) decided to lie about not knowing Andrew, when he know damn well his relationship with Andrew goes back and goes back to their days with Epstein and Maxwell.
These folks are just disgusting and natural born liars. Again, there are receipts to back up the real truth.
This is about lies. Bold-faced lies. These men are lying about any connection they have with Epstein. Trump knows what’s going down with Andrew over his connection with Epstein, so Trump (not surprised) decided to lie about not knowing Andrew, when he know damn well his relationship with Andrew goes back and goes back to their days with Epstein and Maxwell.
These folks are just disgusting and natural born liars. Again, there are receipts to back up the real truth.
The stupid judge gave Epstein a sweetheart deal and let him go home everyday and only had to sleep in cell at night. Why wasn't there an uproar then....because the elite still wanted their "island" fun so they pressured those in power at the time. Epstein already had the goods on those multimillionaires and they ran scared.This is about lies. Bold-faced lies. These men are lying about any connection they have with Epstein. Trump knows what’s going down with Andrew over his connection with Epstein, so Trump (not surprised) decided to lie about not knowing Andrew, when he know damn well his relationship with Andrew goes back and goes back to their days with Epstein and Maxwell.
These folks are just disgusting and natural born liars. Again, there are receipts to back up the real truth.
Do you have any credible sources to back up those "facts" you just presented? Can you show the "receipts" that back them up? Inquiring minds want to know.
The credible sources are the photos showing Trump w/ Andrew in the article linked by Madame Verseau thus disproving Trump’s claim that he doesn’t know Andrew (plus during Trump’s very recent U.K. visit didn’t he meet Andrew as well?) I doubt Trump and Andrew are best buddies - but they have met and socialized - and Trump made that infamous comment years ago that Epstein likes pretty women as much as he (Trump) does & Epstein prefers them on the younger side.Do you have any credible sources to back up those "facts" you just presented? Can you show the "receipts" that back them up? Inquiring minds want to know.
I haven’t been able to watch the interview yet since I am in the US and can’t get BBC One. If anyone of any other way to see it, please let know.
According to Newsweek: "the full interview can be seen when it is broadcast in the U.S. on BBC World News this weekend. It will stream at 3 p.m. EST on Saturday and again on Sunday at 9 p.m."
https://www.newsweek.com/virginia-roberts-giuffre-bbc-interview-prince-andrew-how-watch-1475092
Then you must use the BBC World News Channel Finder site to see if the station is available through your TV service providers:
https://bbcnewschannelfinder.com/
Thank you so much Gawin! I actually found it on You Tube and just finished watching it. Nothing that wasn't already out there but still interesting to watch.
Still, rather worrying.
Thank you so much Gawin! I actually found it on You Tube and just finished watching it. Nothing that wasn't already out there but still interesting to watch.
Well that was a lot easier than following my detailed instructions! LOL!!