candygirl_68
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 236
- City
- -
- Country
- France
my vote goes to Paola of Belgium!
absolutely stunning woman!
absolutely stunning woman!
I so agree with you! Paola would be beautiful in any era but her look really suited that era of the 60's and 70's. Simply stunning!Paola had a delicate ethereal quality, yet it was so right for the time that she was young, the 60's and 70's. Of course, it would be great to look like that at any period in history, but I always thought Paola was well-suited in looks to the mod 60's and odd 70's.
Where can i find a photo of the queen paola in the past?
The remaining royal ladies have never been described as being beautiful by historians or journalists or camera-men of their era, but they disposed other very important attributes.
As one member posted, Queen Sofia, for example, has always been extremely spontaneous, candid and charming but not beautiful by any stretch of the imagination. The same is also true about QEII, Queen Beatrix, Queen Margrethe. What is true is that as they matured, most of them became very distinguished-looking.
Yes, Maybe Paola was the mos beautiful beautiful, but She wasn`t Crown Princess.
Well, in Belgium the first successor to the throne may not be called Crown Prince, but because King Boudewijn and Queen Fabiola had no children, Prince [now King] Albert stayed the first heir to the Belgium throne.
And as Princess [now Queen] Paola is since almost fifty years his wife, she always was the wife of the first heir to the throne. [so, I think she was CP, more or less.]
Princess Elizabeth is overlooked but she was a stunning woman.imoPrincess Elizabeth was very beautiful, imo.
Crown Princess Paola was a really beautiful women as well,