This is Vittorio Emanuele's decree altering the succession to the headship of the house in December 2019.We Vittorio Emanuele Duke of Savoy, Prince of NaplesI am not particularly informed regarding the House of Savoy, but the wording of the decree would appear to back up your statement. Vittorio Emanuele is cited as head of the house and grandmaster of its orders, but not as claimant of the nonexistent throne of Italy.
by the Grace of God and by Hereditary Right Head of the Royal House of Savoy
XVII General Grand Master of the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus
Given the natural evolution of today's society, which is moving towards the desirable elimination of any form of discrimination between persons, with the desire to adapt the Law of Succession of Our House to the spirit of the times, we, of our own will
have decreed and decree
that from today and in the future, succession in the capacity of Head of Our Royal House and Grand Master of Our Dynastic Orders, with all the privileges, prerogatives, rights and powers associated therewith, shall be reserved to Our descendants of both genders, forever, according to the criterion of absolute primogeniture, with lineage prevailing over degree.
Issued in Geneva on the 28th of December of the year 2019
On the other hand, the decree cites "privileges, prerogatives, rights and powers associated therewith", which I suppose some could interpret as a loophole to make other claims if he later changes his mind.
What is the position of the Aostas? Do they believe they are entitled to the throne of a nonexistent kingdom of Italy, or only the headship of the house of Savoy in the republic of Italy?
To be allowed to return to Italy, Vittorio Emanuele and his son had to swear allegiance to the Italian constitution and to the President of the Italian Republic. Since the said constitution bars even the possibility of a constitutional amendment to restore the monarchy, my understanding is that, by pledging allegiance thereto, they have relinquished any claims to the Italian throne or to its restoration.
The constitution also transferred "to the State" all assets on Italian territory held by the formers kings of the House of Savoy, their spouses and their male descendants. That transitional provision (reproduced below in full) ceased to apply in 2002, I think, but the male descendants of King Vittorio Emanuele III never received any compensation from the Republic for their (extensive) assets that were expropriated following the end of the monarchy.
The Savoy orders, however, predate both the Republic and, indeed, the Kingdom of Italy itself; the Supreme Order of the Most Holy Annunciation for example was established by the then Counts of Savoy in 1362 (being almost as old as the Order of the Garter) and the Order of the Saints Maurice and Lazarus, which absorbed in Italy the assets of the old Crusader order of St Lazarus from the 12th century, was constituted by the Pope under the Crown of Savoy in 1572. Although the Italian Republic does not recognize either the right to wear those orders in public in its national territory, it cannot prevent the Savoy orders from existing as a charitable international organization based overseas, which is its current legal status, I think.XIII.
The members and descendants of the House of Savoy shall not be voters and may not hold public office or elected offices.
Access and sojourn in the national territory shall be forbidden to the former kings of the House of Savoy, their spouses and their male descendants.
The assets, existing on national territory, of the former kings of the House of Savoy, their spouses and their male descendants shall be transferred to the State. Transfers and the establishment of royal rights on said properties after 2 June 1946 shall be null and void.
With that - like in Romania and Russia - a glass dome has been placed over the monarchy.
The other end is that one accepts a private person has dicatorial powers and decides how, when and who. Holding powers that even reigning Kings never ever have had. Reigning King Umberto II or reigning King Michael never had any authority to change a comma in the succession, but when non-reigning, suddenly all divine powers befell them or their issue?
I don't know about Romania, but, as far as Italy is concerned, that is correct, I believe. The succession to the Italian Crown was governed by the Albertine Statute, which was the written constitution originally of the Savoyard Kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont and later of the Kingdom of Italy. It was actually a flexible constitution that could be changed by ordinary law (which helps to explain how Mussolini, with the cumplicity of King Vittorio Emanuele III, could change Italy from a parlamentary democracy into a one-party fascist state within the framework of the Statute). Nevertheless, even though amending the succession rules was relatively easy, it still required an act of Parliament passed by both chambers (the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies); it could not be changed by the King alone.
Last edited: