Harry's polo shirt said:
DIANA: WHY DID SPIES VISIT THE MORGUE? Flood of fresh evidence extends inquiry by a year Daily Express 30 Jan 2006
MI6 AGENTS paid a night visit to the morgue holding Princess Diana’s body, new evidence has revealed. It raises the prospect that the body was examined unofficially after the Paris car crash. The agents also had access to the bodies of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul. The British investigation into the tragedy is to extend into next year following fresh evidence of a cover-up. It includes the revelation, first disclosed by the Daily Express, that blood samples taken from the body of Paul were tampered with.
Having satisfied themselves that the blood said to have come from Paul is not his, the detectives want to know whether the samples were switched deliberately on someone’s orders or whether it was a blunder by officials. A source close to the investigation said: “There is compelling evidence that British agents went to the morgue where all their bodies were kept in the period directly after the crash. “What needs to be established is whether Paul’s blood samples were swapped in the morgue with those of a drunk suicide victim, so as to make it look as though Paul was drunk. Forcing “So much new evidence is being uncovered that those taking part in the investigation now feel sure it will extend well into 2007.” The cost of the inquiry has passed £2million – a figure which is certain to double. The accuracy of all evidence is crucial to the conclusion of the inquiry, which was ordered by the royal coroner two years ago in preparation for an inquest into Diana’s death which was – until now – expected this year.
The European Court of Human Rights wants to know why it took so long for Diana to reach hospital, why pathologists broke French law by allowing her body to be embalmed – so make making pregnancy tests invalid – and why blood tests on her so- called “ drunk driver” have never been verified independently.
I'm not typically one for conspiracies--in my view, people love them because they're trying to make sense of their world, and refuse to accept that some things, be it car accidents or anything else, just don't always make perfect sense. People die senseless deaths in senseless accidents and incidents <all the time>, but for billions of us, that reality seems impossible to accept. Many people rather accept that their various governments are infiltrated with aliens from planet x, y or z, or--that prince Philip cooked up a plan with the intent to kill his former daughter in law, than that we are willing to face up to a phenomenon called coincidence or human stupidity etc etc.
But all the same, this new evidence would justify what the family of driver Henry Paul has been contending for years: that they were surprised that Paul was found to have a combination of antidepressants and alcohol in the blood. And even more so because if one is drunk and driving, one typically doesn't drive faster, but slower.
All the same, and this is pure conjecture of course, but here's the outcome I expect of the inquiry: simply that they will find that Diana & co. died as a result of being chased by paparazzi. That no one was murdered. I mean, come on. Diana might have been seen as a loose canon and kindof a nuisance by her former in-laws, but to be killed because of that? Please! I love the woman, but contrary to evidently her own self-important beliefs, her in-laws didn't want her out of the way <that> badly.
I remember a quote I read somewhere from the late Jackie Kennedy Onassis. She was in the back of a chauffeured limo one day, and the driver started speeding up to avoid pesky paparazzi, who were following the car. She then reportedly told the driver to slow down because, she said, "being photographed is not worth getting killed over."
