That is a fanon site, nothing more. You would need critical third party source material to contribute to Wikipedia. Anyone can set up a webpage dedicated to this or that, but unless they have verifiable credentials it’s meaningless. No creditable journalist would cite the page you listed as a "source".
If there is a critical third party source material you may offer, that can be easily scrutinized, then you can and should add the information. If not, then the whole argument is meaningless really.
Look, I don't personally care one way or the other on the matter of who is or is not the most legitimate heir to Georgia. I'm just saying that everyone should take any claims with a grain of salt, and an open critical review of sources is a must. Is there not a newspaper article you may point to? The fanon site doesnt list any sources that I can see.
Last edited by a moderator: