I don't think that Letizia is an intellectual leightweight and she did have a promising career ahead of her, but marrying into a royal family is something else. While most female newsreaders will be exchanged when they get older because of fading looks, marrying a prince and a future as queen will put yourself and your assets on a global map for the rest of your life and guarantee global attention, something that seemed certainly appealing to Letizia.
So in terms of social climing, any woman marrying into a royal family who is not royal herself, eg as Sofia, Letizia is as much 'trepa' as other princesses, imo.
To reduce her to "Newsreader" from an "anchor"/"journalist" is something
Newsreader implies "bimbo", all "t*ts", little "brains", just enough to read a script from teleprompter, a script written by someone else who had actual brains
Given this, how can a newsreader be sent to cover most significant world events? It defies logic! The whole senior management would have been sacked instantly.
One cannot hide or fake lack of intellect, knowledge, competence etc during the intense scrutiny of highest profile events in the world. Look at example of Sarah Palin in US. Her act fell through pretty quickly and she is pretty much a laughing stock.
When Letizia covered the 2000 US elections fiasco, her audience, her management would have thrown her out instantly if she had failed to grasp the situation, and report on the nuances. Same goes for 9/11 and Iraq war!
Yes she was more in the mold of an anchor-roving reporter than a pure war reporter who live their lives in war zones. And yes, I am sure her looks, and her voice put her in the "anchor" track of journalism rather than pure "war reporter" or print reporter etc.
But intellect, analytical skills etc are the base foundation. Looks and voice are just the icing!
Last edited: