.
Princess Charlene elegant in black at the second part of the Saint Devote celebrations today, January 27:
** Full view ** Side view coat ** Upper part ** Upper part 2 **
I love this entire ensemble. The navy colour really suits her and I love her take on fashion. The coat is gorgeously gored and ultra feminine but the neckline owes more to fashion than sense, Charlene's remedy is both elegant and practical.I like the navy outfit as it is very appropriate and stylish for the occasion. I don't understand why she wears fabric gloves instead of leather which look soo much richer.
I think gamine suits Charlene too, but something rubs me wrong about the back of her head....it looks almost flat as a board. Too severe or something.
But from the front it's great!
.Princess Charlene elegant in black at the second part of the Saint Devote celebrations today, January 27: Full view ** Upper part
i was thinking the same, i wish she would return to her longer hair which looked more feminine. this length just looks too masculine.
like this:
http://us.hellomagazine.com/imagene...talks-wedding-babies/0-69-237/charlene--z.jpg
http://media2.popsugar-assets.com/f...7333631.xxxlarge/i/Who-Charlene-Wittstock.jpg
Wow that's a little harsh, one haircut does not make a lovely but reserved Charlene severe or cold, and to say it has rendered her unfeminine and unapproachable is a total nonsense, especially when you consider they select three or four photographs out of several hundred to highlight the point they wish to make in their articles..
Princess Charlene elegant in black at the second part of the Saint Devote celebrations today, January 27:
** Full view ** Side view coat ** Upper part ** Upper part 2 **
I do so agree with you, Lady Nimue! It is just too severe, cold, not feminine at all. Add the harsh bright lipstick to the mix and you have an unapproachable looking princess. She is a stunner! However, I preferred the softer version of Charlene.
Wow that's a little harsh, one haircut does not make a lovely but reserved Charlene severe or cold, and to say it has rendered her unfeminine and unapproachable is a total nonsense, especially when you consider they select three or four photographs out of several hundred to highlight the point they wish to make in their articles.
I am at a loss and cannot understand how someone who, while not being the most gregarious or charismatic Princess on the block but is nevertheless quite serene, can be accused of looking cold, severe and unapproachable. Those statements are not fashion attributes but rather personality traits and so I find myself somewhat at a loss to see them used on a fashion thread.. . . . . Not sure why you are quick to discount the view, MARG. It's a valid one, not nonsense (you may take your push-back farther than the original comments positioned). Charlene has significantly changed her 'look', and the severity of the haircut is part of that change. It's an interesting transformation that creates an impression that for some is not 'soft and feminine'. It's a valid point. In person I am sure she is her usual warm and availing self.
Thank you so much, Lady Nimue! You were able to say what I meant waay better than I could ever hope to. You have a special way with words that I can only dream of!
I am at a cannot understand how someone who, while not being the most gregarious or charismatic Princess on the block but is nevertheless quite serene, can be accused of looking cold, severe and unapproachable. Those statements are not fashion attributes but rather personality traits and so I find myself somewhat at a loss to see them used on a fashion thread.
Now if someone said the cut of the coat was too severe or the colour too cold to suit Charlene, that would be a fashion opinion.
Lady Nimue said:This could be a photo-shoot direct from a fashion magazine. As such, it has it's chic, but something about it is not appealing overall on a personal level. Feels very stand-offish. Unusual.
My push back relates to the attributing of personal traits as evidenced by a personal style of hair and clothes. It is unnecessary to become belligerent because I did not agree with you or udyusa in your views of Charlene's perceived personality change. This is a democratic forum and I queried the terms you both used to attribute personality traits to Charlene, evidencing her hair cut, clothes and perceived mien on a fashion and style thread.Lady Nimue said:It's almost like she's a different person these days since the birth of the twins.
You have me there! I have no idea of the point you are trying to make except that extrapolated from the use of that particular smiley.Lady Nimue said:Might it be that you object to the words used on general principle?
You are correct, I did use the word "looking" however, you did not, going even further and commenting: My push back relates to the attributing of personal traits as evidenced by a personal style of hair and clothes.
It is unnecessary to become belligerent because I did not agree with you or udyusa in your views of Charlene's perceived personality change.
This is a democratic forum
I queried the terms you both used to attribute personality traits to Charlene, evidencing her hair cut, clothes and perceived mien on a fashion and style thread.
You have me there! I have no idea of the point you are trying to make except that extrapolated from the use of that particular smiley.
.Charlene in grey and blue visiting a refugee camp in Italy on February 18:** Full view **