Prince Harry: Relationship Suggestions and Musings 2016-2017

[Rudolph]

Meghan would have to give up everything imo. She can't very well blog one day as Meghan 'Sparkle' Markle and the next day switch hats to cut a ribbon as The Duchess of Sussex.

I said this before but it's Meghan who will have to conform to the BRF, not the other way around. She will either have to be all in or this relationship won't go anywhere.

 

[Osipi]

As far as ending an actress career, I don't think it'd be all that much to do with the roles that she would play but rather, as she is most known for being a TV actress rather than the silver screen of movies, it would be the commercialism angle of TV shows that would put her in a conflict of interest. Sponsors (advertisers of products during the airing of a show) could be construed as getting "the official seal of approval of the House of Windsor" because these advertisers sponsor Meghan's work.

One way Meghan could keep up with her acting is perhaps to support projects in the performing arts. Like Kate does with The Art Room, perhaps something could be set up as a project to get kids to use dramatics as a way to open up and act out what is bothering them. These are just off the wall ideas quickly formed in my less than caffeine fueled brain but I think you get the picture.

 

[Countessmeout]

There is such a thing as drama therapy, both for adults and kids. There are groups in the UK for it. Oily cart and greenhouse schools, charities that were supported by the Cambridge wedding would be good causes for instance.

But not everything has to be about wellness. Honestly with three of them already focussed on mental health, they need branching out. Royals face always been involved in the arts. Meghan certainly could take on some art related patronages.


As for India they were smart. By 'cancelling' they lowered any interest and security concerns. She will have security with her, as they will know that it would eventually come out, but not the security required if the trip had been known. World vision won't suffer for the lack of media attention. They will have sent their own film crew with her as they always do. She will appear in their show and possibly commercials back in Canada. Though world vision does work all over the world, its core source of income is Canada. Her pictures being all over the daily fail wouldn't do much for their cause.

 

[Osipi]

Sometimes I have to chuckle at my own thoughts. I was thinking that should the time come and the need arise for Harry and Meghan to have their joint coat of arms created, they should use the fox for slyness and the red herring for the run around they give the press.

Once again, through foresight and cunning its been managed to totally elude the sensationalist media and got what needed to be done, done. I love it.

 

[AlowVera]

There is such a thing as drama therapy, both for adults and kids. There are groups in the UK for it. Oily cart and greenhouse schools, charities that were supported by the Cambridge wedding would be good causes for instance.

But not everything has to be about wellness. Honestly with three of them already focussed on mental health, they need branching out. Royals face always been involved in the arts. Meghan certainly could take on some art related patronages.


As for India they were smart. By 'cancelling' they lowered any interest and security concerns. She will have security with her, as they will know that it would eventually come out, but not the security required if the trip had been known. World vision won't suffer for the lack of media attention. They will have sent their own film crew with her as they always do. She will appear in their show and possibly commercials back in Canada. Though world vision does work all over the world, its core source of income is Canada. Her pictures being all over the daily fail wouldn't do much for their cause.

I like your ideas about drama therapy and perhaps instead of just being a figurehead she could actually teach and actually be involved as a mentor and not just someone used to draw attention to an issue.

Also good thoughts about lowering interest and then still going to India without any fan fare. The purpose for this trip is mainly promotional. They don't need intrusive media attention to do that. Meghan always seems to be two steps ahead of the media.

 

[Cocoasneeze]

I'm really positively surprised that they trcked the tabloids this way.

Daily fail will have a fit. They'll find 20 more 'scandalous' pictures of Meghan modelling or from old episodes of Suits to pay back for this. I wonder if their reporters are still camping outside her house in Canada.

 

[AlowVera]

I'm really positively surprised that they trcked the tabloids this way.

Daily fail will have a fit. They'll find 20 more 'scandalous' pictures of Meghan modelling or from old episodes of Suits to pay back for this. I wonder if their reporters are still camping outside her house in Canada.

Worst reporters ever!!!

 

[Osipi]

I'm really positively surprised that they trcked the tabloids this way.

Daily fail will have a fit. They'll find 20 more 'scandalous' pictures of Meghan modelling or from old episodes of Suits to pay back for this. I wonder if their reporters are still camping outside her house in Canada.

If they are, they most certainly have enough egg on their faces for being duped into believing that the India trip was canceled to make themselves some nice egg salad sandwiches. I've even got the rye toast to send them with a side order of pickled red herring.

 

[Excalibur]

Sometimes I have to chuckle at my own thoughts. I was thinking that should the time come and the need arise for Harry and Meghan to have their joint coat of arms created, they should use the fox for slyness and the red herring for the run around they give the press.

With the fox perched triumphantly atop a frustrated paparazzi!

 

[HistoryGirl]

Meghan would have to give up everything imo. She can't very well blog one day as Meghan 'Sparkle' Markle and the next day switch hats to cut a ribbon as The Duchess of Sussex.

I said this before but it's Meghan who will have to conform to the BRF, not the other way around. She will either have to be all in or this relationship won't go anywhere.

Youre, right I was being generous. She will have to give up her entire professional life. Anything to do with commercialization and marketing does not seem appropriate for a working member of the BRF.

 

[lilacmagnolia]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markles-diary-gift-kate-9646180

Is this lady absolutely crazy? Harry knows his sister in law better than a journalist! She had to run the gift by him first! This is so sad...

 

[cepe]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markles-diary-gift-kate-9646180

Is this lady absolutely crazy? Harry knows his sister in law better than a journalist! She had to run the gift by him first! This is so sad...

Just because its in a UK paper doesn't mean its true. UK tabloids are at hair-pulling point because there is no real news and no pictures. They revert to their mantra

"When in doubt, make it up"

 

[Dman]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markles-diary-gift-kate-9646180

Is this lady absolutely crazy? Harry knows his sister in law better than a journalist! She had to run the gift by him first! This is so sad...

The media are making this stuff up. There's nothing for them to write about this couple.

 

[Curryong]

The tweet that was picked up on Tumblr about the man who met Meghan in Delhi has info on the organisation Power Foundation, who convened this conference in India. Apparently the conference Meghan attended was opened by a provincial government Minister.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ripinequality

 

[Mirabel]

If Meghan marries Harry, she will need to give up acting.
I really don't see any way she could continue.

However, except for the very top tier like Meryl Streep or Judi Dench, for an actress her career is practically over at forty.

Nor does Meghan strike me as the type of person who would have trouble giving up an acting career to focus on other interests. Time will tell.

 

[AlowVera]

The tweet that was picked up on Tumblr has info on the organisation. Apparently the conference was opened by a provincial government Minister.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ripinequality

ugh chumblr pass.

 

[Dman]

Yes, she would have to give up her acting career. It's pretty much giving up one career to start another...a royal career. I think we all know, if she was allowed to continue acting, the British media would rip her a a new hole. It's just not going to happen and I don't be think there would be any expectation of letting her continue on in the profession.

Meghan will be fine no matter what.

 

[Countessmeout]

It doesn't matter if she was a doctor, teacher or actress or anything else. When you marry a senior Royal, you know you are going to have to give up your career. Anyone dating Harry would know that from the start. If they aren't comfortable giving up their pen career to cut ribbons and do tours, they are dating the wrong man.

That and all the media attention, you are asking a woman a lot. Not many bug career women would consider it. There are those willing to do it for love, Letizia and maxima come to mind, but the challenge is to find them.

 

[Dman]

It doesn't matter if she was a doctor, teacher or actress or anything else. When you marry a senior Royal, you know you are going to have to give up your career. Anyone dating Harry would know that from the start. If they aren't comfortable giving up their pen career to cut ribbons and do tours, they are dating the wrong man.

That and all the media attention, you are asking a woman a lot. Not many bug career women would consider it. There are those willing to do it for love, Letizia and maxima come to mind, but the challenge is to find them.

I don't think it's a matter. If these two decide to get married, she knows she'll have to give up her acting career. I don't think it will be an issue, although she'll miss it no doubt. I'm sure Mary, Maxima and others also miss their previous occupations.

I think we have to stop acting like her whole life will come to an end if she marries Harry. Of course, she won't be able to continue being an actress, but her passion for philanthropy and championing other very worthy causes will grow with a royal role.

Right now, they're just dating and trying to figure out what will be next. To get a good and stable relationship off of the ground, one have to take things one step at a time. I know some are thinking about her age and her child bearing years, but I think we just have to give this couple the time and space to do what they feel is right.

 

[Osipi]

I don't think it's a matter. If these two decide to get married, she knows she'll have to give up her acting career. I don't think it will be an issue, although she'll miss it no doubt. I'm sure Mary, Maxima and others also miss their previous occupations.

I think we have to stop acting like her whole life will come to an end if she marries Harry. Of course, she won't be able to continue being an actress, but her passion for philanthropy and championing other very worthy causes will grow with a royal role.

Right now, they're just dating and trying to figure out what will be next. To get a good and stable relationship off of the ground, one have to take things one step at a time. I know some are thinking about her age and her child bearing years, but I think we just have to give this couple the time and space to do what they feel is right.

Just on an offhand side note, Edward and Sophie had their first child, Louise when Sophie was 34 and James four years later when she was 38.

 

[Countessmeout]

Sophie isn't a good example. Yes, both kids ended up healthy, but she had serious troubles.

But there're continental royals who are a better example, like Mary and Victoria.

 

[rmay286]

Sophie didn't have problems with her pregnancy with James. She gave birth prematurely to Louise and she had an ectopic pregnancy before that.

She was also 38 when she had Louise, not 34, and she was 42 when she had James.

 

[Mirabel]

Right now, they're just dating and trying to figure out what will be next. To get a good and stable relationship off of the ground, one have to take things one step at a time. I know some are thinking about her age and her child bearing years, but I think we just have to give this couple the time and space to do what they feel is right.

I agree.

I don't think anyone should marry solely because of children they might have one day.
Meghan will have access to the very best medical care, and there is no reason to anticipate problems, or any need to rush into marriage.

 

[Angel.10]

I don't know what to think anymore about this relationship, I like Meghan, but I think Harry will not marry her because of her family, they are very troublesome people. He will probably suffer pressure from the royal family to leave her.

 

[Osipi]

The Queen is notorious for never interfering in any of her family's relationships and her assent is the only one needed for any hypothetical marriage to go ahead. The BRF are a family of people that meet millions of people as time passes and I'd bet my last glass of 100% mango juice that they're wise enough and savvy enough to know one doesn't base an opinion on someone because of their family.

 

[Cocoasneeze]

The Queen is notorious for never interfering in any of her family's relationships and her assent is the only one needed for any hypothetical marriage to go ahead. The BRF are a family of people that meet millions of people as time passes and I'd bet my last glass of 100% mango juice that they're wise enough and savvy enough to know one doesn't base an opinion on someone because of their family.

I agree. And if I was a betting woman, I'd bet, that most people have some relative who has done some criminal or shady stuff. Harry is lucky, if he finds a woman he loves and likes, she's willing to put up with his baggage, and marry him, and she doesn't have any dirt on herself. To demand that her family, whom she's been in no contact with for years, are squeeky clean would be just too much.

 

[Osipi]

When we're dealing with the media that has the habit of looking under rocks and hard places, the impressions that people will be getting of this relationship of Harry and Meghan could all be filed under the heading "Love is blind but the Daily Mail ain't".

The most important thing in this this relationship should be only two people that love, support and find out something new about their partner every day and walk together on the path to finding out how they want it to be. Family and friends and Aunt Flossie that lives over the bakery shop don't really figure that much into a relationship at all when its new and fresh.

We just have to keep remembering that the Daily Mail and tabloids knows as much about the intimacy of this relationship as we do. Practically nothing.

 

[Ish]

I don't know what to think anymore about this relationship, I like Meghan, but I think Harry will not marry her because of her family, they are very troublesome people. He will probably suffer pressure from the royal family to leave her.

Kate has Uncle Garry.

Diana had her brother.

Sarah has... well, Sarah has Sarah.

Mark Phillips had his affairs.

The late Earl Snowdon had his illegitimate child born literally weeks after his wedding.

The Queen had her Uncle David and Aunt Wallis.

The DoE had his German, Nazi-affiliated brothers-in-law.

There is a bit of a history of members of the BRF having "troublesome" family members.

 

[AlowVera]

Kate has Uncle Garry.

Diana had her brother.

Sarah has... well, Sarah has Sarah.

Mark Phillips had his affairs.

The late Earl Snowdon had his illegitimate child born literally weeks after his wedding.

The Queen had her Uncle David and Aunt Wallis.

The DoE had his German, Nazi-affiliated brothers-in-law.

There is a bit of a history of members of the BRF having "troublesome" family members.

Andrew was friends with Bill Epstein and involved in that court case.

Diana was often at odds with her Step Mother Acid Rain

MM and PH are simply dating. They may or may not last. The extreme overreaction is rather peculiar. I've been a royal watcher for years.... and yet a man and a woman dating is going to end the royal family?? VERY PECULIAR!!

 

[Osipi]

Sensationalism at its very best. No publication would make any money by proclaiming "We still haven't found Harry and Meghan. Does anyone really have a clue where they are?". These sensationalist articles are written to pander to the masses who eat it all up and come back for more. They buy the stories, the writers make money. Actual facts and the people they write about play no part in what they're doing for the most part. They're just the cash cows.