Princess Irene, Queen Letizia's mother, and any other person can live in the Zarzuela palace. This is legal and constitutional.
King Felipe receives an amount of money established in the General State Budget Law, this law is proposed by the government and approved by the Parliament every year.
The amounts destined for the King are from King Felipe, and he can freely dispose of that money.
He is the usufructuary of palace, it means, that the maintenance of the palace is done by the King with that money, he pays his servants, they are not state officials, he paid them , consider appropriate him .... That money belongs to the King, and the King distributes it freely. This is established in the Spanish Constitution:
Article 65
<<1. El Rey recibe de los Presupuestos del Estado una cantidad global para el sostenimiento de su Familia y Casa, y distribuye libremente la misma.
2. El Rey nombra y releva libremente a los miembros civiles y militares de su Casa.>>
This is not you money, this is King Felipe's money and he distributes it, if you don't like what he spends his money on, that's your problem.
The King does not pass his bills on to the Spanish people as you affirm, in Spain it does not work that way. He receives his allocation from the general state budget, and he freely disposes of it, he can live as he wants and with whatever he wants, as long as he pays it from his budgetary allocation.
All the presidents of the government of Spain, have lived in the Moncloa palace with their relatives, Sánchez is living with his in-laws, his wife and in-laws left the palace to avoid infecting the President of the government with the coronavirus, Rajoy lived with in the Moncloa palace with his wife, children, and his father, who was very ill and cared for in palace, Zapatero remembered that he lived with his wife, and his in-laws, and Aznar lived in Moncloa with his parents and his children, Felipe Gonzalez, brought his parents into the palace, and Adolfo Suarez. ..... And that is not only unique, the houses for ministers also allow them to live with their families. In Spain it is legal.
Princess Irene has an international solidarity foundation, which has its headquarters in Madrid, most of the businessmen who donate and collaborate in the projects of this foundation are foreigners(no spanish), this foundation has important international solidarity projects open, and at the having its headquarters in Spain, computes like spanish. The Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs thanked the foundation for its collaboration in managing projects to help Syrian refugee children.
You are seriously accusing King Felipe, his mother, and his sisters, of these events in order to defend King Juan Carlos or to attack the entire institution.
King Juan Carlos was a member of a Foundation in Switzerland, in this foundation money from Arab countries , entered without justification, this is not a crime in Switzerland, but, later that money was transferred as a donation, by the foundation to a bank account in the foreigner of Corinna, she was lover of King Juan Carlos. This is what the judge investigates this lady, because the money did not stay in Switzerland, it went to the bank accounts of this woman. She is involved in legal proceedings.
A year ago, Corinna's lawyers sent a letter to King Felipe, informing him that his father was the owner of that foundation, and that he had been named beneficiary in the documents.
King Felipe, became aware through this letter from this foundation, and went to a notary to certify the content of the letter, it was then that he renounced the inheritance in writing from his father. He brought it to the attention of the Spanish authorities. King Felipe did not know anything about this foundation, it was a year ago when in a letter from Corinna's lawyers they informed him of the existence of the foundation.
The letter is quite clear, Corinna knew that King Felipe was unaware of his father's activities, so she and her lawers send him. The letter whose content is clear.
King Juan Carlos bought residences, transferred money to his lovers, at no time did he transfer or buy anything, his son, his wife or his daughters.
When it would be published that he made transfers in favor of his son, his wife and his daughters , please you could publish it,it would be surprise...the money of this foundation was for his lover. In Spain , the lovers are not members of the Royal Family.
King Juan Carlos has enjoyed, as previously said, the approval of the press, he has had very well-paid lovers.
King Felipe is doing a great job, it is not fair, that those who consider loyal defenders of King Juan Carlos, they defend King Juan Carlos imputing to King Felipe all the illegal acts that Juan carlos has committed with his lovers.
King Juan Carlos and his lovers know what they have done or were doing.
Is a son guilty of what his father and his lover do? Is a son forced to know what his father does, and his lover?