King Albert II Forming a New Goverment, 2007-2011


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Good news for Belgium and for King Albert II, finally the quarreling political parties have come to an agreement. King ALbert II will swear in the government this thursday!

A good accord with concrete measures"
(Belga)
Tue 18/03/08 - Following marathon meetings lasting 21 hours the five majority parties reached a deal to form a new national government. This ends a nine-month political stalemate after the June 10 elections.



At 6:30 in the morning Prime Minister Designate Yves Leterme (Flemish Christian democrat) announced, "We've reached a good government accord with a lot of concrete measures."

From Flandersnews.be, read the entire article here.
 
Well, we saw that one coming... it was predicted the government would fall in July when it wasn't even installed. I suppose the King will have a busy summer vacacion, and a ruined National Day (unless the silent majority of Belgians will use that day to demonstrate they want an end to this division).
I suppose there are two scenario's: the king refuses the resignation of Leterme and the parties have to negociate for a zillionth time or there will be new elections maybe? Elections resulting in simular blocks probably, so simular negociations.

Thanks for providing all the articles btw.
 
Last edited:
Might this crisis led to the abolition of the Belgian monarchy?
 
Goodness, I was watching the latest financial news in the US on TV and was wondering.........what's next?? Then read the captions under the program about the US mess and read about the Belgian problem..........Hope all concerned find a way to agree and form a government and keep it all together.
 
Well, we saw that one coming... it was predicted the government would fall in July when it wasn't even installed. I suppose the King will have a busy summer vacacion, and a ruined National Day (unless the silent majority of Belgians will use that day to demonstrate they want an end to this division).
I suppose there are two scenario's: the king refuses the resignation of Leterme and the parties have to negociate for a zillionth time or there will be new elections maybe? Elections resulting in simular blocks probably, so simular negociations.

Yep, happy National Day, wearing black and dancing on the ruins of the Leterme I government. At least Leterme won´t sing the Marseillaise this time. :whistling:And to make things even trickier. New federal elections could be considered as unconstitutional since there is no final decision taken in the Brussel-Halle-Vilvoorde question.
Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I guess we get the same scenario as last year. Albert consults the party leaders and ministers of state in the coming days to gain some time and perhaps there will be an interim government or a new formateur. This afternoon he received the chairman of the Senate and the prime ministers of Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels.
And the self declared Mr. goed bestuur (=efficient governance) Leterme won´t have Verhofstadt helping him out this time I guess. That´s what you get when you opt for a party alliance with the separatist N-VA and promise things you can´t keep. And Leterme´s lousy negotiation style doesn´t help either. High time to come to senses. And that also applies for his party CD&V and their strange addiction to Bart De Wever (N-VA) :glare: and co. - and especially for the francophone parties and their permanent “non” policy.
 
Ah, so HBV has to be solved by Leterme and Madame Non... that isn't very hopeful. Mind you therte are other issues too, like the corridor the Walloons want to Brussels, as if the have to cross hostile terretory if they drive to Brussels through Flanders.

I wish some public demonstrations would be held in which the silent majority of the Belgians would stop being silent and give a different signal to their politicians, that kleeping their country is more dear to them than the present catfights about HBV and (even) more autonomy for Flanders.

Anyway, the king will be asking for advice till the end of the week. After that we will see what happens, but according to van den Wijngaert it is unlikely the king will refuse Leterme's resignation. On a brighter note: I read in a Dutch newspaper that Leterme's incompetence might lead to his removal and with Kris Peeters as the new CD&V leader. If they can replace the Walloon leaders too we can start the whole process all over again. Anyway... until the Walloons start doing some concessions instead of saying 'Non' to basically everything there won't be any progress, in the negociations the Flemish already did some concessions that haven't been greeted with much enthausiasm in Flanders. That is what I read in the papers anyway, though my Dutch newspapers might be colored by Flemish sympathies.
 
Last edited:
CdH leader Joelle Milquet has proposed a new deadline: a solution must be found by the 21 July...
I guess she believes the King can perform magic tricks?
The latest guesses for the future of Belgium: Yves Leterme remains head of a government that only concerns itself with the socio-economic problems, while the regions will try and come up with a constitutional solution...

To be continued still...
 
Well, that would at least mean that the other things can be dealt with.
I read that the king yesterday invited the PM's of Flanders, Wallonia, Brussels and the German part to the palace. I think it was the first time he consulted them on such a matter, which is intresting considering there are voices that are in favour of the regions sorting it out by themsleves.

The Telegraaf reminded us that the king is in a difficult position at the moment. Last summer he was first accused of being too often on holidays and not that much involved with the process, only to be later accused of having performed some mini coup d'etat and being too much involved.
 
Well, that would at least mean that the other things can be dealt with.
I read that the king yesterday invited the PM's of Flanders, Wallonia, Brussels and the German part to the palace. I think it was the first time he consulted them on such a matter, which is intresting considering there are voices that are in favour of the regions sorting it out by themsleves.

yep, it was the first time. He even consulted them before he consulted the leaders of the political parties (which he is doing today). I guess the King would rather have a confederal state to rule than no state at all.
 
yep, it was the first time. He even consulted them before he consulted the leaders of the political parties (which he is doing today). ...

This move just indicates that Albert works hard to rescue Leterme imo. For the third time btw, I hope Leterme gets it now and his own party finally follows him. Involving the regions into the state reform talks was actually Leterme´s last and not unrealistic idea to get the state reform talks on track right before the big bang. And it was his own party urged on by alliance partner N-VA which killed this idea. Perhaps this crisis has a catharsis effect and the persons involved get real…finally. And don´t get me started on Bart De Wever and Geert Bourgeois (N-VA). :ermm:

As for the deadline – would have been better Milquet hadn´t opened her mouth. But in the end her deadline isn´t completely out of the world. Albert can´t delay the decision about Leterme´s future till doomsday. And what a depressing and morbid National Day it would be if there wasn´t at least a hint how to get out of this mess. I´m sure Albert isn´t keen on delivering his National Day speech without “good” news for his fellow citizens. And the National Day speech will be aired on July 20th. Albert “just” has to find a scenario to cool down the situation and get the stubborn politicians back to the negotiating table – without silly deadlines for a change.
________________

Btw it always worth to take a look at deredactie.be - English,
this page even offers newsclips on the crisis in English and is really up to date most of the time.
 
Last edited:
I haven't been in Belgium much, nor have I kept up to date very much with the recent political crises there, but what I'm wondering is this: if the country was founded largely on the basis of religion (Catholic) is this no longer considered a sufficient unifying factor? So does language alone become the sole factor in how people feel about the existence of the state? On the other hand, if religion continues to be a consideration in many people's views, then how can the Flemish want to be with the low church Calvinists next door in Holland? Someone mentioned in this thread that a large percentage of French would be open to receiving Wallonia as a province of France, but on the other hand - isn't this very much going to be seen by many Walloons as an opportunistic attitude by the French? They're surely very well aware that many French look down on the Belgians as their very poor country cousins. I mean, all those jokes about "les Belges". People remember those things even in a crisis.
 
Actually, people aren't as religious as they used to be in Belgium, so no, I don't think religion alone is enough to keep the country together.
As for a union between Flanders and the Netherlands, it is an idea which is much more alive in the Netherlands itself than it is in Flanders. If Belgium were to split, I'm quite sure Flanders would rather try to survive on its own than to become part of the Netherlands. (Nothing personal Marengo:flowers:)

The King has consulted the vice-PM's and the social partners (union leaders etc) today.
Whether or not the King will accept Leterme's resignation is still unknown.
 
Oh, here nobody takes it serious either LadyLeana, everybody is well aware that the Flemish utterly dislike us. Just the populist right toys with the idea, ignoring all the added problems such an unlikely union would bring.
 
I just remembered it from something they said on the news somewhere back in spring.

PS: we don't dislike you guys, it just seems like that. In reality we're just jealous of your beautiful bicycle paths and the roads without holes in them and that sort of thing...
 
Last edited:
Likewise we are jealous of your healthcare system and educational system ... come to think of it, such a merger could have its advantages ;).

--
Anyway, from Flandersnews.be an article about 'Madame Non' setting the deadline for July 21st (my brithday, and coincidently also Belgiums ;)):

"Madame Non" sets deadline for King Albert
(VRT)
Thu 17/07/08 12:00 - King Albert on Thursday continued to take soundings in an effort to find a way out of the political crisis that has Belgium in its grip. On Wednesday the monarch spoke with a selection of party leaders. On Thursday employers and union representatives have a date at Laken Palace.



The leader of the Francophone Christian democrats, Joëlle Milquet, on Wednesday insisted that a solution should be found by 21 July, Belgium's National Holiday. Flemish Christian democrats see no point in setting a new deadline.

Read the entire article here.

The King is busy receiving politicians, some pictures:

The King and vice PM Patrick Dewael

The King and Laurette Onkelinx

The King and Jean-Marie Dedecker
 
Last edited:
If Flanders goes on its own, would they keep the monarchy? Or would a division of the country bring an end to the monarchy?
 
Confused American girl here

So every time there's an election a new Government is formed? or as PMs change it's considered a new Government? Perhaps it's just the word usage here but I don't understand forming a new Government every few years. Is it that a new administration is set up with new divisions of power? For example, in the US we have elections every four years for President and every two years there are congressional elections that help shift which of our parties are the most prominent. We don't call that forming a new government however but I'm wondering if that is a similar situation.

I do hope everything settles down soon for you all, it's enough stress when anything political raises up for any country. I can't wait for our election in November for things to settle down. All the campaigning and nit-picking for the past few months is getting old but still the price we pay for having a representative republic. There are days I wouldn't mind a constitutional monarchy:whistling: but every system has pluses and minuses.
 
:ermm:Having a constitutional monarchy does not mean that there are no elections.

:rolleyes:On the contrary, in the Netherlands for instance we have elections for the National Parliament every four years. And also elections for the Provincial States, the City Council and the European Parliament. And all with there own campaign and election day.:rolleyes:

Every four years when a new parliament is chosen a new group of ministers form a new government. If all goes well that government can do his job for the whole four years, but the parliament can "send them home" or they can give in there resignation as they think that they cannot do there job anymore. In Belgium it is similar.
 
King Albert has taken a decision tonight:

1. He appointed three mediators
Francois-Xavier de Donnea, Minister of State, former mayor of Brussels and member of the francophone liberals (MR)
Raymond Langendries, member of the francophone Christian Democrats (CDh), Minister of State, Member of the European Parliament
and Karl-Heinz Lambertz, Social democrat and Minister President of the German-speaking community.
King Albert asked them to find out how the institutional dialogue can be re-started in a credible manner. They accepted the mission and will report at the end of the month.

2. King Albert received Prime Minister Yves Leterme in audience at Belvedère Castle this evening. The King refused to accept the resignation of Yves Leterme and his government and asked the government to promote the chances of success of this mission as much as possible.

__________

Somehow a surprising move and this decision is taken faster than most commentators assumed - so Albert has something more or less concrete to tell in his National Day Speech (which will be recorded tomorrow it seems) . All in all it´s a move to gain time (with uncertain outcome imo) and to enable the government to continue its work for a while, especially on the socio-economic sector. The decision is taken in close cooperation with Yves Leterme it seems. Not to appoint a Flemish politician as mediator is a remarkable step somehow. This meets the demands of the Flemish parties, which asked for an initiative of the francophone camp.

Mediator Karl-Heinz Lambertz (a surprising choice) already commented on his appointment. He says it´s an acknowledgement of the German speaking community in Belgium and he will do his best to complete his mission successfully.

BBC NEWS | Europe | Belgian PM's resignation rejected
 
Apart from all this confusion and because of it, don't all Belgians feel reassured to have an experienced hard working King who tries his best to circle the wagons? Can you imagine a crisis like this being handled by a younger, less matured person?
 
I hope now that everything will work out for the govt. It seems to me that King Albert is working very hard to try to make things work. A person who couldn't handle the stress would just throw their hands up and give up. Not King Albert. I just hope that the monarchy reigns for a long time and the Flanders and Wallionians can try to get along.
 
Ah, that means the king has to interact with Francois-Xavier de Donnéa frequently? That might be rather emberrasing for the two of them, though I suppose they have gotten used to it by now.

I agree Karin, it all seems to e to get a bit more time, and maybe the entire resignation was something to show the Walloons how serious Leterme just was and that it is their turn to make at least some comprimises.

Odette, I think the king is in a difficult position, as he is obviously the spider keeping the country together at the moment, so to speak, his position is tricky and he has to move very carefully. Last time he got the complaints that he interfered too much with politics for example.
 
Marengo it must be a difficult time for the Royal Family. If one assumes that they are a "symbol" for all the citizens and above politics, I can understand those who may be getting upset about the King's involvement. Then again if he was vacationing in the South of France and letting the politicos settle this, he would be criticised even more. One wonders sometimes how much is more than enough.
 
I read a Norwegian article, quoting Le Soir, saying that the King's actions (denying Leferme his resignation/having the talks) was probably one of the few things holding Belgium together at this point.
 
Ah, that means the king has to interact with Francois-Xavier de Donnéa frequently? That might be rather emberrasing for the two of them, though I suppose they have gotten used to it by now.

LOL, Donnea was awarded with the Order of Leopold for this little embarrassment - by Albert. And the whole family survived Philippe and Mathilde´s civil wedding, I think this was unbeatable when it comes to embarrassment. :rolleyes:
The three of them appear to get along well though and there doesn´t seem to be tension between them, otherwise Donnea would not have been appointed imo.
Picture details

However, Donnea wasn´t Albert´s first choice. According to “De Standaard” only Lambertz made it on the first list. Alas, several suggestions of the court have been refused by various top politicians, so they ended up with these three persons who aren´t exactly heavyweights (influence wise). But especially Lambertz is eager to distinguish himself and the German community. And since he wasn´t involved in federal politics so far he has a somehow neutral view on the situation. So perhaps they really come up with a more or less creative solution to restart the institutional talks. Hope dies last. And Albert sure is relieved to be out of the eye of the storm for a few day.
 
I know nothing about the Belgian contitution, but I wonder if it's like many constitutional monarchies in that the king has royal perogatives that are rarely used but are available in times of crisis. Of course, no matter what decision a monarch makes under these circumstances, those who disagree with the decision will label it as "too political.":)

Marengo it must be a difficult time for the Royal Family. If one assumes that they are a "symbol" for all the citizens and above politics, I can understand those who may be getting upset about the King's involvement. Then again if he was vacationing in the South of France and letting the politicos settle this, he would be criticised even more. One wonders sometimes how much is more than enough.
 
If Flanders goes on its own, would they keep the monarchy? Or would a division of the country bring an end to the monarchy?

I can't imagine Flanders keeping a monarchy after such a split. Wallonia maybe, though it isn't very logical to start a new state with an outdated institution like that.

Note that Belgium will probably not break up any time soon, IF that ever happens it will take several decades at least. For the near future a move to (even) more federalism is very plausable of course.

norwegianne said:
I read a Norwegian article, quoting Le Soir, saying that the King's actions (denying Leferme his resignation/having the talks) was probably one of the few things holding Belgium together at this point.

It is often said that the King is the only Belgian. Not true of course but the king is usually seen as the most Belgian symbol that exists. There should be more things keeping the country together of course, if all politicians/population wanted to split the country would do so, dispite the king.

johann said:
Donnea was awarded with the Order of Leopold for this little embarrassment
Aah, so if that is what get's you a Leopold I wonder... ;) Did Amamo ever get one? For those who do not understand what we are talking about: Donnea was supposed to be one of the lovers of princess Paola.

---------------------------------------------------------

SOme additional news in English from Flandersnews.be:

King rejects government's resignation
Fri 18/07/08 16:18 (UPDATE video) - King Albert II of the Belgians has rejected the government's resignation. The king wants Yves Leterme to stay on as Prime Minister for the time being. In the mean time, three senior politicians have two weeks to see how Flanders, Brussels and Wallonia can begin a "credible" dialogue about more regional autonomy.



The three senior politicians who have the difficult task to find a way out of he present political crisis, are two Ministers of State, Raymond Langendries (Francophone christian democrat) and François-Xavier de Donnea (Francophone liberal), and also Karl-Heinz Lambertz, a German-speaking socialist. Mr Lambertz (small photo below) is the Prime Minister of the tiny German-speaking Community in Belgium (photo on top: Lambertz/de Donnea/Langendries).

Read the entire article here.

-------------

'The ball is now in the Francophone court"

Fri 18/07/08 12:32 - The king's decision to refuse the government's resignation and to appoint three senior politicians who have to prepare the way for direct talks between the different language communities, has triggered a number of reactions.



The Flemish christian democrats of PM Yves Leterme are happy with the king's decision.


CD&V chairwoman Marianne Thyssen points to the fact that the three negotiators include two French-speaking politicians. Let them come up with a solution now, Ms Thyssen says. "The ball is now in the Francophone court."

The alliance between CD&V and the Flemish nationalists of N-VA also wants "rock-hard" guarantees that a state reform will eventually be worked out.

"The three mediators have been given two weeks to come up with something. That means a decision can be expected in the short term, and that the issue won't be delayed for too long."

Geert Bourgeois of N-VA urges the Francophone players to take some initiative: "It's time for action."

Read the entire article here.
 
Last edited:
GVA had a rather funny poll, for those who read dutch, look here. In the internetpoll 1/3 was in favour of a union with the Netherlands.

Now something remarkable: some respondants suggested that a Dutch princess and a Belgian prince should marry; their eldest child could be the ruler of the new country... As a capital even the very unremarkable Baarle-Hertog was suggested (A Belgian enclave in The Netherlands). And the countries name could be Vlaanderland or Nedervlaanderen...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom