Little_star said:
Most pictures of Kate, as you pointed out show her alone or with her mother...
She still has the support system that Chelsy does not. there has not been more than a "few" photos of Kate- there are hardly any really. And Chelsy home she shares with her brother and the estate of her father have been published, but unlike Kate those photos did not have to be retracted. She does get easy treatment from the press for sure. No other royal girlfriend has had the picturesof their home retracted, they are usually staked out and photographed leaving there again and again and again. Kates was photographed once, then it was retracted and never photographed again. once again an example of her special treatment by the press.
She has absoloutley no right to threaten legal action, as there is nothing illegal about those photographs . plus, I will agian raise the point that the next day she is smiling and posing- I don't understand why she wont accept you can't have it both ways- I can understand if she clearly was shy she might have a problem with the press and might request to not be photographed when she is not with William, but when she smile and pose for the cameras as much as she does, you forfeit all rights to complain since you clearly don't have a problem with the attention. In a way I almost feel sorry for the press, i never thought I'd say that, but what are they ment to do? they don't know wether she will pose for them or try to sue them when they try to get a photo.
There is an absoloute 10 billion percent chance we would know about her charity work or work- you claim she is followed from the moment she leaves her door, so wouldn't it be photographed? I claim she is given special treatment(which she is) and yes, she is photographed occasionally, and if she was photographed leaving work or a charity place, there is absoloutley no way in hell they would let a photo oppurtunity like that pass them by- it is FAR too valuable to the image they are busy building up. and anyway,all 'royal girlfriends' have these pictures taken daily, no matter what sort of job they are doing. yet another example of Kates special treatment- the press almost never photograph her! compare the numbers of photos with ANYONE. that girl is on easy-easy-easy street! Perhaps she does work from home- I certainly hope so! There were rumors of her starting up an internet order baby clothes company- if so good for her, but someone would have talked by now because that's what people do. unless she threatened them with legal action as well. what a disgrace. Kates natural expression is not sullen, so I don't know why she glowers like death in approx. 50% of her pictures.You can clearly see how hard the facial muscles are working, which you don't need for your natural face, plus, as I keep pointing out, she grins away when she decides it suits her, and I think the reason I am so disgusted with Kates behaviour is no one else in her position would even dare to THINK about behaving like she does- and if by some crazy miracle they did, they would never get away with it, let alone be praised for it.
Now, the video of Chelsy I can't really remember where to find it, but I guess if you wanted to see it might show up on some sort of search, it was one of her earlier trips though. I'd really love to know how you find her dreary though?? that girl overflows with personality in every photo, no matter what the situation. she is probably the best thing to happen to Harry!
Kates bodyguards- were mentioned in all the 'column inches' written about her, but only around a certain time- sometime earlier this year, perhaps around March-April?
I wouold like to add that Harry has visited Chelsys family home a couple of times, and stayed there- which is exactly why they were chased at high speed in their jeep whilst on safari! and you'd think they would have learned how dangerous that is! yet did ANYONE complain? no, they were too busy listening to Kates whining because the press got there days wrong- was Kate grinning and posing, or glowering and threatening today? what to do ,what to do.
Little_star said:
Well she's perfectly happy to live off her father's money so I'm not surprised if some people see it that way.
Unfortunately, Chelsy turned 20 in January and is a full time uni student. people like that are often forced to accept money from their parents. I do it too, and Kate still does it. I am 20 and a uni student as well, and because of the nature of my course, I can get a job as something related to my furture profession, but on a lower level. however, the pay is really quite good for someone in my situation and I earn more money that all of my friends. Yet I cannot afford basic necesities without the help of my parents. In Australia, at my age,you are reviewed for financial assistance based on your parents income- regardless of if you live with them or not- so that fact that I have rent, bills, etc that some others my age might not is irrelevent because my PARENTS earn too much. they decided that since it was their income that ment the government couldn't support me, they would help. I am desperately trying to pay back every cent as soon as I can, but it is hard to do it as soon as I would like. So since Chelsys parents have a lot more money to spare than my parents, she is probably helped by them since someone in her situation doesn't earn enough to live without some sort of assistance. just pointing out the differences in the situations.