AGRBear
Nobility
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 354
- City
- San Francisco Bay Area
- Country
- United States
I am well aware of Bear's theories, this is why I posted what I did. Bear does not want the truth, she wants a different answer.
My theories? No. I'm not the first one who questioned all of this information which AWF claims I am personally responsible.
Like I have suggested, anyone can find a forensic web site, find the section on burning human bodies, and, you will discover what I've discovered. Burning bodies in the time frame Yurovsky and the others have testified is not possible.
The National Geographic Special gave us the testimony of their scientist, who has voiced the same as other scientists involved in this case. Not possible.
Yes, the Bolsheviks claimed there was a lot of kerosene taken from the Bolshevik storage. And, no, the kerosene used alone would not have been capable of burning the two bodies as suggested by the Bolsheviks. In fact, it is believed that some of the kerosene is known to have gone into the hands of others and it's quite possible some of it went into the hands of blackmarketeers so no one is sure how much of it was actually used on Alexis and possibly one grand duchess.
Yes, the Bolsheviks make claim that there was lye used. There is evidence in the both the mass grave and the two pits that this is true. But, due to the action of the watery grave and other chemical reactions, it would not have decomposed the bodies to the extent that only a few pieces of bone and a few teeth would be found 90 or 200 years later.
It's the mystery of the teeth that interests me most. Every mouth has a certain number of teeth. I have 25. Take away molars [since I'm not sure how many the grand duchess and Alexis had cut) there are still plenty of teeth missing one would find in my grave after 90 years of my death. So, where are the rest of the teeth of Alexis and a female grand duchess [Maria or Anastasia]?
There are a lot of unanswered questions.
Since it's proven that it would take a lot of wood with the kerosene, and, IF the two bodies had indeed been burned and burned and burned more than thirty some hours, then, why doesn't any testimony tell us? What difference does it make if they tell us the truth instead of trying to convince us that it took two hours? If that is what happen then that's what happen.
AGRBear
Last edited: