Translation of the documentary veien til et kongerike (the road to a kingdom) part 1
I’ve written where they are in the documentary, so that those who have seen know where they talked of what.
Interviewer/voiceover: One day Crown Prince Haakon shall inherit Norway, minus the Palace that belongs to the state and politics that belongs to the politicians. Haakon Magnus has turned 40 years old. Who is he? And how should he fill his role?
Outside the palace:
I: What do you think of it (the palace)?
CP: I think we have a beautiful palace. I’m glad it’s a palace that’s quite Norwegian, more down to earth, different than Versailles and I think that we’re very comfortable with it in Norway.
I: When Queen Elizabeth 2 is visiting do you feel like it’s too shabby or is it enough?
CP: (laughing) I don’t think so. I think it represent how we are. I think it’s good.
I: Do you feel it’s a good thing that the Norwegian monarchy is only 100+ years?
CP: Yes, I think it is. The family of course follows the Danish monarchy that King Haakon came from and goes further back.
(Clips from when Haakon, Maud and Olav arrived to Oslo from Denmark, how that came to be, and other clips of the family. The state form is not older than that the Crown Prince remembers the little boy in the video.)
CP: It’s tangible. It’s a story that’s easy to comprehend.
The interviewer/voiceover says that a normal part of preparations to royal duties are a military education and studying relevant subjects such as political science and law at universities. The expectation of the Crown Prince where clear even if they were not loudly spoken of.
CP: Especially earlier I felt like I carried a lot on my shoulders (expectations and traditions.)
I: Do you remember a turning point?
CP. When I had to decide in my teens whether I was to take a military education or not. That was the first proper choice I took where I felt I chose not only in regards to what I myself wanted, but I reflected over the position I was in, what I were to do in the future, that I was part of the monarchy, that I manage the tradition Norway have had in three generations before me.
I: It’s my understanding that it was a process for you to accept that you were to one day be King, but how difficult was it? Did you close doors harshly? Can you give us a picture on how it was? How did you get used to the idea?
CP: There were no doors closed harshly as I remember it. I talked a lot with my father, but that was in large part about how I in my youth so strongly separated my royal persona who did his duties and Haakon who did sports and listened to music and went to concerts. I didn’t find a way to unify them, but as I grew older it became more and more difficult to keep them apart. I felt I had to choose (who to be) to feel more real. It was about growing up.
CP: (about him and MM during their early days) We were vulnerable because we challenged norms.
CP: If you had asked (people at an earlier stage) if I could marry someone who had a child, many would have said no. But it was possible.
I: Did you feel like you put the monarchy in danger when you married MM?
CP: I did feel that, to a certain degree, but I also felt like it was a test in a way. A test to see if there was room for me in this institution, and that if it wasn’t there was little reason for me to have a place in it.
I: You are a people near distinction in many ways (royals) even though you have great survival skill.
CP: That has to do with culture and history. You can’t separate it from the history and what lies in the tradition. It’s a part of the modern society. And I find that interesting. Because there are those who will say that monarchy is outdated, but you can turn it around and say that the most modern societies and most well-functioning societies are monarchies. You can view it from both sides. It’s one of the ingredients in a well-functioning form of society.
But the debate surrounding monarchy is not my debate, very many think so, but it’s not. I feel like I sit on the sidelines of that debate, and I am quite tired of it, many people wish to talk to me about it. But it’s completely different for me, I have to ask myself if I feel this is a way of life I should use my life on, can I contribute to anything? It’s I that fill my role, and how the monarchy evolves in many ways depend on me and my family. I don’t need to discuss what the best state form is. Since the Norwegian people continue to want the monarchy I have to ask myself if I want to do this and how to do it well.
I: Even if you can’t change the world as Crown Price there is an activist in you standing guard?
CP: Humans have lots of dreams, hopes and projects and things we do that are important to us. But you can’t let it take over. You are more than all of that combined. To be passionate about something is positive, but you can’t be so bound to it that everything falls apart if the dream does. Regardless of how it turns out you have to be okay. I think that’s where happiness is to be found.
I: Let’s say that the monarchy was dissolved in your time, would you be able to separate that from who you are?
CP: I could at least try. I thought a lot about that in the time before the wedding. If this (the engagement and consequences of it) turns out to be very difficult, how do I live with that? It’s easy to say I would have handled it, but it’s not certain I would. But I could have tried, and I believe everyone have a great capacity to handle change. The most important thing to me is not to be afraid of it. That’s not okay, to live a life where you are afraid all the time. So I try not to.
I: Do you wish at times you were part of something more progressive?
CP: Yes, at times I may feel like that. But there are a lot of possibilities within the framework I am in.
I: How much room do you have to do as you want?
CP: That’s an open question; larger than one would think.
I: Can the projects be too weak and boring?
CP Yes, and that is something that is in the press from time to time. People saying we are too bland and boring. Just as often people also say we are too political, so perhaps most of time we are just at the right place.
I: What is needed to keep the relevance?
CP: The point of origin is what is important to us, Mette and I work with thing that are important for us. Like youth, UN.
CP: I wish to look Ingrid in the eyes and give her something worth fighting for.
I: If the job as heir were announced would you apply?
CP: (laughing) Yes, I probably would have. The question is always if I have chosen it or not, and I have.
CP: (about the role) I like that we’re not very formal here, but it can’t be too informal either.
I: What about doing an interview on the steps like this?
CP: It’s on the line to being too informal.