General News & Information for Prince Albert and Charlene Wittstock


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Albert must have told Charlene something about this story and she is prepared to weather the storm ---- if there is one! She can walk away if she chooses. She has chosen not to!


I agree. I am not commenting on whether there is any truth to whatever "the story" was..:ermm:

But CW has cast her fate with PA and with Monaco apparently, so there is no turning back now....

I would dearly translate the interview, but I can't even get the clip to run !

Same problem here. :bang: All I know is that PA and the Palace are seriously rattled if they are sending Albert's much loved youngest sister out to do damage control....yikes. :ohmy:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PS could have spoken out on her own. This all seems very vague and too neatly timed. If they have something why aren't they being more detailed and why wait until now to release it. It is very cruel to release it now.
 
PS could have spoken out on her own. This all seems very vague and too neatly timed. If they have something why aren't they being more detailed and why wait until now to release it. It is very cruel to release it now.
I'm with you. Before anyone came up with it in the press I read it on Eringers site. My guess is someone posted it there to cause trouble and the press took off with it. As I posted Charlene was in Greece when this showed up on the blog. Albert left behind some women who are very jealous he isn't marrying them. "Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned".
 
Unfortunately I fully expected something like this to happen, and I would bet dollars to navy beans I know who is behind it, or mixed up in it in one way or another, but I won't mention any names as the last thing this "person" should be given is more attention. The whole thing is utterly absurd. Charlene knew all about Albert's "past" long ago, nothing could shock her into leaving now. Also, as others have mentioned, if she had been trying to get on a plane in Nice the French police could not have stopped her -that's just silly. The Prince of Monaco can expel people from the southern departments, he cannot take anyone prisoner. This is all the work of someone with a grudge trying to hurt the Prince at the worst possible time.

:monacostandard: :monacoflag: :monacoflag:
 
I'm with you. Before anyone came up with it in the press I read it on Eringers site. My guess is someone posted it there to cause trouble and the press took off with it. As I posted Charlene was in Greece when this showed up on the blog. Albert left behind some women who are very jealous he isn't marrying them. "Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Scorned".


Ugh, that name! :sick: I first heard of that name and that facebook site when Renata posted it about a month ago on here :glare:, thankfully one of the moderators caught it and deleted it, as it was full of malicious lies/gossip/rumour/innuendo/et al to hurt not only Prince Albert, but the Principality in general, including the Monesgasques. :nonono:

The best thing to do is to ignore it, take away its powers, its negativity. So that is what I am going to do -- ignore it. :cool: Bye bye! :wave:
 
Unfortunately I fully expected something like this to happen, and I would bet dollars to navy beans I know who is behind it, or mixed up in it in one way or another, but I won't mention any names as the last thing this "person" should be given is more attention. The whole thing is utterly absurd. Charlene knew all about Albert's "past" long ago, nothing could shock her into leaving now. Also, as others have mentioned, if she had been trying to get on a plane in Nice the French police could not have stopped her -that's just silly. The Prince of Monaco can expel people from the southern departments, he cannot take anyone prisoner. This is all the work of someone with a grudge trying to hurt the Prince at the worst possible time.

:monacostandard: :monacoflag: :monacoflag:
Bones I also have an inkling who could be behind this but I have to agree that Cw could have escaped if she had wanted to. I do not however think it is utterly absurd just somewhat. Enjoy the wedding. looking forward to your wise commentaries
Deo Juavante
 
Last edited:
I'm french and I read sometimes l'Express; it's not a tabloid, so if there was a rumour on the web from twitter or facebook or anything else, the newspaper wont publih it untl it's checked by journalists.

The Telegraph yesterday had an interview with the director of the L'EXPRESS and Christophe Barbier (a very very well known political journalist, not a people one).

And they are sure from their sources and check every details. So of course the timing is not nice.

But let's enjoy the wedding, we know for sure that something in the press will be revealed just after. iF Albert did something silly, what a pity, if it's not the case He will be entitled to sue them.

From my point of view, what is disturbing is the type of newspaper which relates the information. I fear there is probably something true in their allegations. The article on their website this morning is quite revealing.

For the assignation of Albert's lawyer, at the last minute, they retract from suing the paper (explanation in the Telegraph).
 
I keep hearing how they check, double check and check again -but it doesn't add up. If they are so certain of their "facts" why do there seem to be so few of them? How could Charlene be in Greece and Nice at the same time? Why would French police use force to keep her in the country? If they are sure of why she was allegedly leaving, why is the actual reason not mentioned at all? They hardly reported any "facts" at all to check, only vague implications.

:monacostandard: :monacoflag:
 
You may call me cynical, but it's possible that the whole affair has been staged by the Palace, to garner even more publicity.
 
Unfortunately I fully expected something like this to happen, and I would bet dollars to navy beans I know who is behind it, or mixed up in it in one way or another, but I won't mention any names as the last thing this "person" should be given is more attention. The whole thing is utterly absurd. Charlene knew all about Albert's "past" long ago, nothing could shock her into leaving now. Also, as others have mentioned, if she had been trying to get on a plane in Nice the French police could not have stopped her -that's just silly. The Prince of Monaco can expel people from the southern departments, he cannot take anyone prisoner. This is all the work of someone with a grudge trying to hurt the Prince at the worst possible time.

:monacostandard: :monacoflag: :monacoflag:
would love to hear your theory on the leaker if you would indulge me ...:flowers:
 
You may call me cynical, but it's possible that the whole affair has been staged by the Palace, to garner even more publicity.

After so many interviews to "sell" this wedding, with little sucess, I would not be surprised at all. So classles as usual.
 
At the end of the day ... if anyone knows of any lawful impediment why these two should not be joined in marriage let him speak now or forever hold his peace.

If Albert knows of any lawful impediment this must not come out after the wedding ---- Albert needs to make it known now.

It is then up to the two of them where they go from there.

If this is all nasty and malicious spite (which I believe it is) then the two of them will come out the stronger for it.

In which case I hope he sues the whole lot of them!
 
Last edited:
Oh dear me. Poor Charlene and Albert! :sad:

I don't think I'll ever understand the animosity towards them. Disgracefully cruel in the days before their marriage

Negative news is not animosity. If this is true, this is freedom of information and journalism. Animosity would be name calling added to the information.
 
After so many interviews to "sell" this wedding, with little sucess, I would not be surprised at all. So classles as usual.

LOL! You really need to lighten up, and start enjoying life...maybe you can start feeling this notion of "happiness" that Charlene and her Prince may actually feel. It's a great feeling...trust me on this one.

As she is still technically a private citizen of South Africa, no one could "stop" her from boarding a plane. As many have suggested, the timeline of her "fleeing" coincides with her stay in Greece. Mind you, as a royal, no one could stop her either.

Hopefully HSH Prince Albert and the soon-to-be HSH Princess Charlene will sue the living cr@p out of the "informer"
 
Here is a paper of Le Figaro with further details, explaining links between the monegasque security force and the french police: Le Figaro - France : Monaco*: la rumeur circulait dès dimanche
I didn't know that french higher civil servants were employed in monegasque police and I don't think it comes as something good. And, for the non-french speaking posters, the article says Charlene had her passport confiscated by the french police. I hope it is not true because it wouldn't be a matter of pride for french police, which has already very bad reputation.

The journalist's papers are often criticized being to much police-sided in security matters but he may have very close sources in the french police because he belongs (or belonged) to the french Control Group of Police Files/Groupe de Contrôle des Fichiers de la Police (that is easily checked on Google), so...

It is getting weirder every day.
 
Thank you for the link, Sancia.
If French police acted on French soil following orders of the Monegasque Security Force, even confiscating the passport of a South African citizen as alleged, this is indeed raising questions as well as possibly causing damage on a political level.
And, again: 'Le Figaro' as well as 'L'Express' are not tabloids, but possess credibility and thus have a good reputation to loose; it's highly improbable that they'd risk it by inventing a whole story just like that.
 
Thanks for the info on the links between the Monaco Government and that of the French Republic. It's only natural, in view of the various treaties and cooperation that exist between the two. We're no longer in the Fifties/Sixties when General de Gaulle misused his powers regarding the Principality.
 
Whatever happened the wedding is going to go ahead. It has been said that Charlene will not take part in many official ceremonies, probably because, again I repeat, it is said, that she doesn't know French and seems not to be language inclined as far as French is concerned. The newspapers that have printed this news, now "old hat" would not print it if they did not have impeccable sources. If there was a problem I doubt it existed in the past but is something she found out or saw for herself very recently.
 
Let's hope that the ceremonies will help to "take the shine off" what has been written about them.
 
Okay..so what is the timeline of Charlene "fleeing"

Because I can't honestly think of a day that she wasn't photographed by the press, either in Greece or Monaco................so it must have been quick attempt. And if she was being held back, I am sure she could have spoken to members of her family in SA to make a ruckus in the press.

Sorry....this whole story sounds fishy to me. I am not familiar with L'Express and maybe portions of this story are true but for me....something just doesn't ring true....how convenient for this to happen days before the wedding......its like a bad soap opera.

And if its not true, how sad and awful to do this to a couple days before their wedding. No matter who is doing it. That's classless.
 
Sadly - or happily - we may never get to the bottom of this fracas.

Both have been very involved in their "Project Marriage".

Let's hope that the two can have their day - without distractions. That's all that matters.
 
I must admitt I was surprised too.
I don't know much about Monaco but from what I know of the french press, I can't dismiss the story as false. There is too much serious newspapers (Le Monde, Le Figaro) talking about it for this. For example, Le Monde rarely speaks about celebrities or people. So I think something actually happened, but what?
 
I don't think it is true, but Albert likes/liked the ladies.There was a German woman who accused Albert of fathering her child (his 3rd) and the claim was squashed by DNA results. I can't find a source for this, so it may or may not be true. It would make sense, though, as DNA results were required by the Prince for the other two children, which he subsequently recognized as being his. If science finds that he has more children, he will take care of them.

This current, allegedly pregnant woman has no standing until the child is born and DNA can be tested.

Albert has had a very long bachelorhood, with many, many girlfriends. He may have more children. If he does, I'm sure he has told Charlene, as I don't see him trying to hide anything from her. That would be foolish.

As for Charlene's feelings...just put yourself in her place. Someone trying to sabatoge your wedding would make you at least uneasy. She appears to be resolute and will wed her prince tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Okay..so what is the timeline of Charlene "fleeing"

Because I can't honestly think of a day that she wasn't photographed by the press, either in Greece or Monaco................so it must have been quick attempt. And if she was being held back, I am sure she could have spoken to members of her family in SA to make a ruckus in the press.

Sorry....this whole story sounds fishy to me. I am not familiar with L'Express and maybe portions of this story are true but for me....something just doesn't ring true....how convenient for this to happen days before the wedding......its like a bad soap opera.

And if its not true, how sad and awful to do this to a couple days before their wedding. No matter who is doing it. That's classless.
As I posted the first time I read about this was on Eringers QandA and someone came back saying she was in Greece for the Special Olympics which was supported with all the photos. A few days later it showed in the press. I don't believe it, her father and the Palace have denied the rumors. Charlene wears her emotions and I have seen happiness and sulking. Charlene is happy. She is not the type of person to fake being happy and if there is trouble in the marriage I'm sure we will see it through her.
 
Okay..so what is the timeline of Charlene "fleeing"

Because I can't honestly think of a day that she wasn't photographed by the press, either in Greece or Monaco................so it must have been quick attempt. And if she was being held back, I am sure she could have spoken to members of her family in SA to make a ruckus in the press.

According to Charlene's father, she flew to Paris on Monday (I don't know if that's the date the newspaper claimed she tried to leave). She supposedly went to look for shoes and a hat for the wedding.

Monaco royal wedding still on - Times LIVE

A police detective is saying she had her passport taken away. I really hope that's not true.

 
Last edited:
I feel so sorry for Charlene, I feel so sorry for Albert. To have their wedding day tarnished and in some way ridiculed by these spiteful journalists is unforgivable, and cruel. There will come a time when these same journalists will want interviews. I hope Prince Albert will be like an elephant in this respect. ELEPHANTS NEVER FORGET!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom