Layla1971 said:
Ok, I'm NOT critisizing anyone! You have all been very imaginative here in thinking of names, but HOW could we burden this poor child with 8-10 names!
Having more than 4 names may give a whole new meaning to a child learning to say and spell their own name, let alone remember it!
The lovely
Princess Elsiabeth of Denmark, who has 11 names, has said she found it amusing to have all these names.
You might even say the royals have the privilige of including each and every name they find relevant without being mocked for it. I mean, the ordinary kid in school with 11 names would definitely get a hard time.
We've had 10 Christians and we will have had 10 Frederiks as well when the Lilleprinsen gets to rule. I think it's the right time to take up an old tradition, or to start a new one with a scent of old times.
http://www.fortidensjelling.dk/jelling10.htm
Here's a list of medieval kings. If they took up for instance Valdemar it would be Valdemar 5. Apart from Valdemar I find the medieval names a little boring and too simple, like Svend and Erik. Chistoffer is nice, but if you read about all the early Christoffers they all ended in not so flattering circumstances, one or two being killed by poison and one losing all of Denmark to other kings.
http://www.fortidensjelling.dk/sagnkongerne.htm
These are the prehistoric kings. They got really odd names, but I found one I really like, and that's Godtfred. Besides, if they choose a prehistoric name they can name this new prince Godtfred 1 since we can't really know if and when and which lands the prehistoric Godtfred ruled over.
Godtfred Valdemar Christian Henrik Frederik
That's my suggestion. In due time the little prince can choose for himself which name he will use when becoming a King. It would be Godtfred 1, Valdemar 5, Henrik 1, or of course Christian 11 or Frederik 11.
Godtfred means 'good' and 'peace' in Danish, so ''King Godtfred'' can be translated into ''King Makepiece''.
His everyday name, and in the press, would be ''Godte'', which translates into a piece of candy.
btw; Henrik has no history in Denmark as a King's name, but on the other hand the name Ingrid doesn't really have a history in Denmark either, but I think we can all agree that by Queen Ingrid it has become totally plausible to use Ingrid as a ruling Queen's name.
I'm sceptical to John though. I think they can keep it in store for their second son. There's absolutely nothing regal about that name.
To us, John is the obvious name from Mary's side, but there must be other names from Mary's grandfathers that she considers using.