This has always caused me confusion. Charlemagne (Charles The Great) as King of the Franks is always counted as a "King of France" in many of the books I have. Therefore there were 11 kings by the name Charles if you count Charlemagne. The Kingdom of the Franks composed what is now modern France and parts of modern Germany and the low countries. If the kings of France are counted from the treaty of Verdun in 843 which broke up the Carolingian empire then yes, there were only 10 kings named Charles (we'd also have to exclude Louis I in that scenario..causing further discrepancies). What really causes me confusion: Is the Kingdom of the Franks a separate entity (or kingdom) from what later evolved into the modern Kingdom of France, or is it the ancient Kingdom of the Franks the same as the Kingdom of France? I'm confused and I have a degree in European history!!
I am confused as well, as one of the sources on this thread (Wikipedia) clearly states that Charlemagne is numbered Charles I in the French regnal system.
If it is in error, I can edit that out, but then I'd have to edit 10 other wiki's - as Wikipedia (as well as Encyclopedia Britannica) lists Charles the Bald as Charles II.
I was always taught (minored in European history) that Charlemagne, Charles the Great, was Charles I.
I am very interested in Charlemagne, especially in the linguistic turn that Frankish took when he settled in northern Gaul/Merovingia/Francia. The previous Celtic language co-existed with Charlemagne's Frankish/Germanic tongue. At that time, Celtic and Germanic weren't as widely separated as they would later become. Both had absorbed Latin words, of course - especially Frankish.
But how this situation evolved into modern French, I do not know. But I am guessing the Charlemagne's language would still be partly intelligible to French-speaking people today.
Karlaz (his name) was from the Frankish/Germanic side - for Free Man or Man. However, it quickly came to mean "King" in several other languages, all because of his actions. He is a great example of a common man who rose to great heights and founded a royal dynasty with vast historical significance.
I never tire of reading more about him, but I'm not sure where I'd go to see documents from his day (or reproductions of them). At any rate (and here, the Wikipedia article is pretty good), he was apparently born in a region of linguistic diversity (three languages spoken locally) and he must have been proficient at all three (my view). It seems unlikely that he would have learned to read and write, as a child, and mostly wore ordinary clothing. But there must surely be courtly documents from his day. I am going to get to visit the French National Archives this spring, so I was hoping to find something from his era there. Perhaps a quixotic quest.