If you have to have a PR campaign to make people like you and agree with your marriage...Victoria seems the only one in family who seems to have a real connection and warmth for the people or interest in them.Not a good thing at all.
This! I don't know about dyslexia cos he may have felt unconfortable before, but the higher profile is surely a PR move to make swedes approve him more and so Sophia.
Nobody knows what the future holds, but it looks like Victoria and Daniel might not have another child after all. Given that Estelle is still a child and won't be having any children of her own for another 25 years or so, it is very likely that CP will be third in line to the throne, or later possibly second in line, for quite same time. Furthermore, if Victoria indeed doesn't have any more children, CP's eldest child with Sofia will be the new "spare". I just can't see someone that high up in the line of succession not playing a major role in royal duties.
What on the earth makes you jump to that conclusion? Estelle is only little over three years old! Not everyone have their children within one or two years of each other – especially not people as busy as Victoria and Daniel.
Nobody knows what the future holds, but it looks like Victoria and Daniel might not have another child after all.
.. Probably just the fact, that Daniel is not a healthy man, and Victoria is approaching 40 - so ... the probability of conceiving naturally is allready much diminished - It took them many Years to have Estelle. I do very much wish, they would have another child.
And NO i do not hate Sofia - I just think it is NOT Princess-material - she is more the Kadashian-Typ - which is bad enough
And NO i do not hate Sofia - I just think it is NOT Princess-material - she is more the Kadashian-Typ - which is bad enough
What has Sofia done "Kardashian style" in the last ten years?How can you be so sure that she isn't "Princess-material" before she's even a princess?
What has Sofia done "Kardashian style" in the last ten years?
I also don't think Victoria and Daniel will be having more children and I think they know it. I believe this is why Leonore was given a title and why Madeleine and Chris moved back to Sweden because the fact is, for the moment Leonore is the spare of that generation.
I also think that if Carl Philip and Sofia have children (one assumes they want to but nothing's certain) That child will become the new "spare" which means CP and Sofia will be important, visible working members of the family.
.. Probably just the fact, that Daniel is not a healthy man, and Victoria is approaching 40 - so ... the probability of conceiving naturally is allready much diminished - It took them many Years to have Estelle. I do very much wish, they would have another child.
I am at a loss as to why a video Sofia did not appear in was quoted. Perhaps our definition of "Kardashian Type" is the problem here.There is a video in Youtube, Sofia attended at Toshi Swedish Midsummer Party in 06 at the Puck Building in New York City. At the party the girls/waitresses (?) are topless with swedish flags or flowers in swedish colours painted to their breasts. The girls also give massage to the guests.
Sofia is interviewed at the video. She is having her clothes on, rather revealing though. There is also at least one other video of the party, but Sofia isn't in that. To that video you have to subscribe to proof your age.
Never noticed before, that Sofia has a ring at her "ring finger" at this photo in the summer 2006.
http://www.thenewyorkscene.com/webready_polo72206/images/prevs/IMG_2071.jpg
In today's press conference with QMII, a member of the Swedish press asked QMII about the upcoming wedding. QMII confirmed (in Swedish) that she was invited and that she looked forward to the wedding which she expected to be a festive occasion. The SRF throw good parties.
She was also asked about her impression of Sofia Hellgvist and QMII replied that she had only met Sophia Hellqvist very briefly and as such had no particular opinion other than she seemed to be a nice girl.
A diplomatic answer to say the least.
I'm pretty sure the family in general (including QMII as first cousin) still has reservations about Sofia, but it's up to her to prove them wrong once she takes up the job.
In today's press conference with QMII, a member of the Swedish press asked QMII about the upcoming wedding. QMII confirmed (in Swedish) that she was invited and that she looked forward to the wedding which she expected to be a festive occasion. The SRF throw good parties.
She was also asked about her impression of Sofia Hellgvist and QMII replied that she had only met Sophia Hellqvist very briefly and as such had no particular opinion other than she seemed to be a nice girl.
How could Queen Margrethe have responded differently? "No, I think Sofia is not a good girl for Carl Philip?" She gave the only possible answer she could give.
I don't think the family have any problems with Sofia. I think the problems are with the folks on the internet. Obviously, she will get to know many royals over time and they will get to know her.
I am at a loss as to why a video Sofia did not appear in was quoted. Perhaps our definition of "Kardashian Type" is the problem here.
So, courtesy of the Urban Dictionary, a selection of being 'Kardashian':
I don't see the connection myself. At the above-mentioned party, she was one of many well-known people present and while her top was quite low, it was not unacceptable. Her short "interview" was actually quite humerous and gave an insight into her "persona" when she is relaxed and happy.
- any woman who is fake, cheap and easy.
- A beautiful nobody........famous only thanks to physical attributes and free exposure via the internet.
- adj.) what results from pimping oneself out in the context of lowest-common-denominator pop-culture, selling yourself to all comers, living a life completely constructed and organized for this purpose
That video is from 2006 and so yes, it is within the last ten years but I do not see anything 'Kardashian' about her on it. She wasn't hogging the camera and wittering on about nothing worth saying.
Seeing her speaking spontaneously it was easy to see what the attraction is. She seems delightfully self-confident and comes across as bubbly, very engaging and quite charismatic. With the benefit of nine more years of maturity, I don't find it at all surprising that Carl Philip is enchanted with both her looks and her mind.
To see the possible future princess of Sweden attending to a party like that at the videos is not appropriate behaviour to a sweet and well-mannered girl.
Am I correct in thinking that palace/governmental officials will be aware of the various videos and photographs of Sofia over the years and that Carl Philip has not been prevented from marrying Sofia?
Of course they know. I don't think they have seen all of them, but they have a rough idea. Sofia has also talked openly about her background, saying (in short) that she doesn't regret anything, but she would have chosen differently today.
The court is trying to give us the impression that Sofias way into the family was an easy ride. I'm sure that's not true. But I'm also sure that they have gotten to know her over the years (they've been together for five years now) and that she is fully accepted.
Am I correct in thinking that palace/governmental officials will be aware of the various videos and photographs of Sofia over the years and that Carl Philip has not been prevented from marrying Sofia?
That is exactly the point I have made all along. In order to marry, CP needed the consent of the government and the approval of his father, who has to seek consent from the government on CP's behalf according to the Act of Succession. Since CP got both, I must assume the King and the government have no problems with Sofia's past or, at least, believe that her past does not prevent her from becoming a princess of Sweden.