corazon
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,045
- City
- -In some dark place-
- Country
- Argentina
no, charles can do every he want do, is his problem not mime.
Last edited:
no, he can do every he want do, is his problem not mime
ok, charles is a poor victim
BeatrixFan said:He's just as much a victim as Diana. And so is Camilla.
diana is dead and charles and camilla are the vistims
Regina said:We can never say X suffered more than Y, or Y even more than Z. But we must think in this: Diana believe she would be married forever with the man she loved. In the very recent times after the wedding, she discovered he was still in love by Camilla. Diana confronted Camilla in a party telling her to not see Charles again! Diana had the right to do this because Charles was her husband. Camilla knew Diana was suffering very much and she didn't care! Charles and Camilla only thought about themselves, they were very selfish! Charles didn't care about his children, about his country, about his wife. He loved Camilla and he had dates with her. Diana did wrong things too, but in the end she was alone, and she never found her true love. Of course, divorces can happend to everyone even for Princes and Kings, and no one can say for sure they will never divorce, but saying Diana was unhappy just like them is too much, imo. Charles didn't married with Camilla because he was always a person (a very weak person) who didn't stand up to defend the woman of his life. If he had married with Diana, and some years after that he fall in love for another person, that would be sad, but more or less understandable. Now, marring with a virgin of 19 years old knowing he was still in love with another, only demonstrate the lack of values he had. It's the same with Alexandra of Denmark: she is divorced from Prince Joachim, and she has now a new boyfriend. And no one is blaming her like people blame charles and Camilla, because Alexandra was a correct and decent woman when she married. She married with her true prince. Sadly, things didn't work out.
Diana was not an angelic lamb, and Camilla is not the Devil here. The problem in all this has a name: Charles.
ysbel said:There are problems, the husband and wife can't communicate, then they reach a point of no return where they're not even trying to communicate and camps start on either side as to how horrible the other person is.
.
The problem in all this has a name: Charles
Regina said:It's Not the same with Alexandra of Denmark: she is divorced from Prince Joachim, and she has now a new boyfriend. And no one is blaming her like people blamed charles and Camilla, because Alexandra was a correct and decent woman when she married. She married with her true prince. Sadly, things didn't work out.
.
corazon said:I am talking abuot the '80. charles sleep with camilla the night before he married with diana. I remenber when the queen want married with the duke of edimburgh the king don't want and she was very clear, she will abdicate if she no can married with phillip (finally the king said yes), charles not, he do that the mother and father said must do (married with diana)
branchg said:She loved Charles and wanted to become Princess of Wales.
Camilla was not the "other woman" scheming in the background. If anything, she played her role very quietly and with dignity. She wanted Charles to go back to Diana and make their marriage successful. She never had any interest in becoming his wife or Queen. She was supportive of Charles marrying Diana and felt she would be ideal.
Regina said:Charles could never abdicate for Camilla, he didn't had courage to do such a thing, not ven in dreams.
But many royals were able to fight for their loves: Queen Elizabeth II, King Harald, Prince Haakon, Queen Beatrix of Netherlands, etc. And I'm glad they did it!! Stand up and be able to defend the woman of their dreams is what separate boys from Men.
corazon said:. I remenber when the queen want married with the duke of edimburgh the king don't want and she was very clear, she will abdicate if she no can married with phillip (finally the king said yes), )
Regina said:If he had married with Diana, and some years after that he fall in love for another person, that would be sad, but more or less understandable. Now, marring with a virgin of 19 years old knowing he was still in love with another one, only demonstrate the lack of values he had.
sure, she was princess elizabeth, she could resign to her right to the throne, like sayako.Skydragon said:Princess Elizabeth couldn't have abdicated, she was not yet the Queen.
Regina said:Charles could never abdicate for Camilla, he didn't had courage to do such a thing, not ven in dreams.
.
ysbel said:Why do you believe Charles was in love with Camilla when he married Diana? Because Diana said so? .
But many royals were able to fight for their loves: Queen Elizabeth II, King Harald, Prince Haakon, Queen Beatrix of Netherlands, etc. And I'm glad they did it!!
branchg said:She was supportive of Charles marrying Diana and felt she would be ideal.
BeatrixFan said:We're talking about very very different circumstances in different countries. It isn't fair to generalise like that - we have to look at Charles and Camilla not Elizabeth and Philip or Beatrix and Klaus.
corazon said:because is true. He have camilla' photos in her honeymoon. he was in love with camilla all the time.
ysbel said:Somehow I don't believe you corazon. Do you want to show some proof?