- Joined
- Jun 30, 2009
- Messages
- 44,200
- City
- An Iarmhí
- Country
- Ireland
Has the funeral date been announced?
Of course that was a socially desirable answer. What could he say? Yes, I wanted a title for myself and my children? Prince Henrik gave no socially desirable answers. And he was slashed in media.
Has the funeral date been announced?
In light of his apparent interest in the privileges and benefits of the royal family, why did he not prevail on Princess Christina to request Parliament's authorization for the marriage, which would have allowed him to become a member of the Royal House?
Has the funeral date been announced?
I was reading Princess Christina's obituary in the New York Times today, and it included a link to a 1975 Times story about her engagement. That older story refers to a six-year-old boy who lived with Guillermo "for several years," and mentions that the child was no longer living with him and that no future plans had been made regarding the child.
It seemed like an odd thing to include in a news story about the engagement, so I'm curious what it was all about. Has anyone ever heard about it? What became of the child?
Here's the NYT obit: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/16/world/europe/princess-christina-dead.html
Here's the 1975 NYT story about the engagement: https://www.nytimes.com/1975/02/25/...ance-tell-how-romance-grew.html?module=inline
First,the jerk had no title,second,there was vast physical abuse by that guy,not once but often.No,he went into a monastery hiding from the world and keeping himself closeted in more then one way by doing so,the cowardice lice,and afterwards moved back to the US where he came from and had lived with men instead of women before he met dear Christina through her work in NYC!
He is persona non grata here!
How very peculiar since we haven’t heard anything about the child since or perhaps we have in some subsequent interview with Guillermo or the princess? The mention of the child is sits rather oddly in the engagement announcement interview :
“They were asked about a six‐year‐old boy from the school in Harlem who Mr. Guillermo had lived with for several years. Mr. Guillermo said that the boy was not living with him now and that although “we both want to continue our interest in his welfare,” no future plans had been made concerning the youngster.”
Curiously enough in 1975 Beatrix told her former nanny -as recorded by the late Willem Oltmans (!) who had the same former nanny- that Jorge Guillermo 'came from an excellent family' and was not a goldigger.
I am not quite sure in how far this was true by the time the two met. She was at least very independant. The princess left her parents when she was sixteen to live with a friend & her parents. For her studies she moved to Groningen and later to Montreal where she studied on the conservatorium and after that to New York. She lived abroad in anonimity and even had a job as a singing teacher and gave sound therapy to blind people. I suppose New York in the seventies was hardly a place where naivité could be sustained for a long time.
Many years ago, I read that Jorge Guillermo and Mr. O'Gorman lived together and that they had adopted a little black boy. One of the rumors is that O'Gorman was Guillermo's lover. Considering how dastardly Guillermo turned out to be, I wouldn't be surprised if after he got on the gravy train with Princess Cristina, he just didn't care about the little boy anymore and put him up for adoption. I mean, he was no longer living with O'Gorman and considering how callous he turned out to be vis-a-vis poor Princesss Cristina, its not unlikely that this unfeeling man could have just put the child up for adoption.
Ned worked in a school in Harlem. He took temporary custody of one of his students Ricky. This was when Jorge lived with him. He never adopted the boy but considered him a son. Ricky died of AIDS in 1996.
https://www.library.georgetown.edu/exhibition/ned-ogorman-through-poets-lens
There is a huge difference between a title of Count/Earl and the title King just because you married the Monarch. Not a relevant comparison IMO.
And her daughter has two sons according to Hein Bruins.
That was not the context. Prince Henrik touched a big fat pink elephant in the porcelain cabinet, with the blindingly obvious question: why are male spouses treated differently than female spouses? In this era of Me Too, inclusivity and acting like differences in gender are an absolute no-no.
Let us turn it around: were Margriet and Christina two Princes, then their spouses, 100% in the same position as Pieter and Jorge, would have been princesses. Look at Pieter's very own four daughters-in-law.
It is socially desirable to play down and claim that a title means nothing at all. If Pieter had said the blindingly obvious question: hey, why are all my daughters-in-law Princesses and why am I - 52 years a member of the Royal House with a spotless parcours- still just Pieter?
When Jorge Guillermo or Pieter van Vollenhoven claim: pfffwt, a title? It is the same like: pfffwt, a knighthood or a honour? Nooooo, totally un-important! That is the convention. That is the socially desirable answer.
Of course it means nothing. Yeah. Sure. Unless they get a title, a knighthood or a honour.... We all know better.
Are there others like me that rejoice in the fact that there is so little information to be found about the princess and her family?
She wanted to live in anonimity with her children. And they succeeded!
We have to resort to Wikipedia and other indirect sources to even find out if and how many grandchildren she had.
Yay for the princess!!!
There are more posts about Jorge G. than for the late Dutch Princess. Now about the Lorentzen ..
This thread starts with a lot of "R.I.P's" and now turns into a lot of discussion about her ex-husband...imo not the way a woman who valued her privacy and independance would want to be remembered
This is a vid of P.Christina singing: