lucien
Majesty
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2005
- Messages
- 7,630
- City
- Amsterdam
- Country
- Netherlands
What a puzzling and nonsensical comment to make in the context of this forum and of this particular discussion! If you're holding onto the fact that the monarchy was abolished in Austria in 1918, then no one would have been singing the Kaiserhymne in the Cathedral because no one would recognize that Otto was part of the Imperial family. In that case, we wouldn't be offering hypotheses about why some members of royal families sang the hymn whereas others didn't.
Note that we are not debating here the use of titles in different countries - there are certainly other forums that focus on that topic - but we are wondering together and trying to understand why some people sang and others didn't. We all have our different ideas, but the fact that Austria doesn't recognize titles of nobility is neither here nor there. To most everyone in that church - and certainly within the family - she is Archduchess Marie-Astrid of Austria. I doubt that anyone would disagree with that statement. The fact that she didn't sing - whether it be because she was emotional, at prayer, or refraining out of allegiance to Luxembourg - is still interesting, and there is no reason why we shouldn't discuss it and offer our guesses.
In fact, my impression is that you simply don't like my comments and want to be argumentative. If so, it's a free forum, so go ahead....
Thanks for the links Lucien !!! You are right, the photos are impressive.
...And many, many thanks for all your work and information in this forum... You are really great !!!
Prince Jaime's grandfather was the Empress Zita's elder brother....Prince Jaime of Burbon-Parma was in the second desk and King Mihai I of romania, King Simeon Ii of Bulgaria and Princess Astrid of Belgium in the third one.Prince Jaime was hardly representing his aunt...
Thank You, Lucien, for all the info. you provide, including the much coveted links.
Because of you I was able to watch the whole beautiful ceremony live early this morning.
Thanks for the explanation but I am Catholic and I do attend mass every sunday so I know what I am speaking about when I am saying not eveybody is kneeling during consecration or for receiving communion in France. That is why I spoke about "cultural reason".
What I - as a legitimist - think is highly remarkable is the fact that in Austria, that abolished Monarchy and titles, such a ceremony has taken place.
You just have to think it over, it was in the presence of the Austrian "president" and chancellor that the coffins were covered with the old banners, the coffin of HI&RH was followed by the Imperial Austrian Standard and the Kaiserhymne was song in the Stephansdom. In the City the "republican" Austrian Army paid respect to the late Archduke. The city was crowded with thousands of people.
Thank you, Sancia. I didn't mean to suggest (at all!) that what you said wasn't true, only that there is theological meaning to the different liturgical postures, so they are not merely a matter of cultural practice. Sometimes people understand what these theological meanings are, and sometimes they merely follow what everyone else seems is doing in church, and it becomes a habit. But, in every case, a bishop or priest (who has studied liturgy in seminary) has made a decision to institute a particular practice in his diocese or parish. Of course sometimes people move from one parish to another after having become accustomed to one practice, so you may see mixed practices in one Mass or service. Anyway... I'm not disagreeing with you, except perhaps on the point that culture doesn't (in my opinion) have that much to do with it; it is fundamentally a question of liturgy and theology.
So I ask You: If a republic really would have the power to abolish titles of families living to traditions over a couple of hundred years and to abolish Monarchy or would even take this measures serious, what have the "president" and the chancellor done there? It is meaningless whether they sung or not, just their simple presence shows that they recognize the fact that there is more to the ideals of monarchy and that these cannot be abolished.
Those families we are talking about in this forum are and will always be noble, will be royal or imperial - no matter what politicians will say or "decide", and this devine right cannot be taken away from them - as we all could see yesterday in Vienna.
Just to explain one more point: I spoke about culture because french bishops gave the autorization to keep standing during consecration or communion with a gesture showing our respect for what is happening. They gave authorization too to receive communion while standing. Of course, that doesn't mean that kneeling during the Canon is forbidden. More and more people are kneeling for consecration but it is still rare to kneel while receiving communion. These authorizations are much discussed but they are still in use. That is why I used the word "culture".
Way Too short-sighted,the deceased had a broader view on the eucomenical cause and would not have minded a bit.These sort of ultra strict nonsense is not of this world anymore,flexibilty and opennes to other denominations is.So,If Carl XVI did receives Communion,good,got him a taste of us Catholics.We like to share all our goods with all!That is the Christian spirit.
What I - as a legitimist - think is highly remarkable is the fact that in Austria, that abolished Monarchy and titles, such a ceremony has taken place.
You just have to think it over, it was in the presence of the Austrian "president" and chancellor that the coffins were covered with the old banners, the coffin of HI&RH was followed by the Imperial Austrian Standard and the Kaiserhymne was song in the Stephansdom. In the City the "republican" Austrian Army paid respect to the late Archduke. The city was crowded with thousands of people.
So I ask You: If a republic really would have the power to abolish titles of families living to traditions over a couple of hundred years and to abolish Monarchy or would even take this measures serious, what have the "president" and the chancellor done there? It is meaningless whether they sung or not, just their simple presence shows that they recognize the fact that there is more to the ideals of monarchy and that these cannot be abolished.
Those families we are talking about in this forum are and will always be noble, will be royal or imperial - no matter what politicians will say or "decide", and this devine right cannot be taken away from them - as we all could see yesterday in Vienna.
Totally agree with both of you. But we might have such a funeral again in the future. Otto pretty much earned those honours by being a relentless fighter for his own believes, let's remember he lived through nazism, communism, rejection coming from 'allies', and indifference at large. He had to work, he became a scholar, a politician, a diplomat, he had to provide for his own family, he studied at times when princes did not study and worked. He raised a large family and he worked tirelessly and passionately. Of course he was also a Habsburg and you can separate that from him, but he didn't sit and wait, he lived life to the fullest and he achieved a lot.I agree 1000% with you.No politician has any say in any way on titles etc etc,whatever they may think themselves.
Is it the old tradition of the Habsburg that seperate the heart and and body? The Otto's heart was buried in Hungary while his body laid in Austria. I would like to know the reason why?
Is it possible to visit Kapuzinergruft as a tourist? How does entry cost? The same question about church where are buried Hearths of Habsburgs and Pannonhalma/Hungary.
@ Johan Salvator,no,that was what you meant and what I read,and the Crypt,really,is closed for further funerals as was stated by the Habsburg Family.Then one shouldn't question that,they know best..
May I ask what should be the future for Archduke Georg in Hungary. He is living there with his family he tried to be a Politician in Hungary , did he succeed ?
Is it possible to visit Kapuzinergruft as a tourist? How does entry cost? The same question about church where are buried Hearths of Habsburgs and Pannonhalma/Hungary.