Terri Terri
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,537
The media's sole focus was already on speculating as to whether CP Mary was pregnant, with the story on the front pages of the tabloids released on August 5th as seen in this photo at http://www.ppe-agency.com/500px/Aug2010/PPE10080501.jpg...so the funeral did not get a lot of attention from the media because the focus was on whether Mary was pregnant again! Is Mary to be blamed for the tabloids printing the story before the announcement was officially released on August 6th? She does not have control over what the media prints and when they print it!I am very happy for them; but could she not wait until after Countess Ruth's funeral as well as Nathalie's Billed-Bladet article pertaining to her son?
I think that was in bad taste. If she waited this long, she could had waited another week.
In addition, according to this story at MSN.dk, http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmsndk.starlounge.com%2Findex.cfm%3Fobjectid%3D91001&sl=da&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8, the official announcement of the pregnancy was postponed until after Queen Margrethe had left the funeral. I think that showed a mark of respect!!
And Billed Bladet decided when to print the article on Nathalie's son, not CP Mary. As a matter of fact, in the paper edition of the magazine which carried the article on Nathalie's new son, CP Mary and her family are on the cover as the main story with the same speculations as to whether CP Mary is pregnant - BEFORE the official announcement was made! So it's hardly CP Mary's fault in this instance - Blame Billed Bladet!
http://www.billedbladet.dk/Kongelige/ArticleFolder/2010/8/BILLED-BLADET 31 smugkig - 6.aspx