Gaudete
Courtier
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2017
- Messages
- 514
- City
- South East Coast
- Country
- United Kingdom
I think the hardest part for people to swallow is that the decision was made without consultation with Nicholas and seemed to actively go behind his back before announcing it. Radu was part of the meeting that went on (without Nicholas' knowledge) that decided to revoke his titles and status.
Yes Nicholas may have done wrong, no doubt about that in some ways, but Margarita and Radu look cold and distant for not playing mediators between Nicholas and the King. They look cold for appearing to warmly embrace him, calling him their spiritual son when it suits but letting him get dropped without a flicker of concern later on. Or so it appears.
Is there any proof that Nicholas had no idea until the announcement and that Radu was at the meeting in any other capacity than as a member of the Royal House? Aside from Nicholas' own statements of course. Why wouldn't Radu be there? I don't much like the man but it's only natural he would be IMO. Elena was there too, why isn't she the villain of the piece?
We don't know what Nicholas did. Maybe when we do, we'll see why Margareta and Radu have "dropped" him. The common assumption seems to be that he did nothing wrong. King Michael wasn't the sort of man to take such an action without due cause.