Empress
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,122
- Country
- United States
Well, it's a bit over the top for my taste, as christening gowns go.
Lady Bluffton said:Hopefully this comment is still on topic, keeping in mind our good administrator's wishes.
How do you get baptized without being affiliated with a particular denomination? I'm sorry, but that's a new one for me.
Who will perform the baptism; shouldn't that determine "what kind" of baptism it is???
Empress said:Well, it's a bit over the top for my taste, as christening gowns go.
Henri M. said:At least the Orange-Nassaus make use of presentation gowns and christening gowns. And they used the centuries old silver broche of a dove (representing the Holy Spirit). Especially that last, with the knowledge that 300 years ago also a princely baby wore that jewel, is a very beautiful symbolism.
I have seen royal families doing baptisms without even a christening gown at all (Belgium, for an example). Or present them to the world, with simply a woollen suit (most other royal families) while at least in the Netherlands they use a presentation gown from 1880 and a presentation cushion from 1909.
Danielane said:The purists would say the christening gown (at least for the Catholics) is to be used only once the baby has been baptised: the parents enter in the church with the baby dressed in white but not the gown, and they dress the baby with the christening gown just after the baptism.
That is what has been done for my whole family.
BeatrixFan said:The one baptism and then let her choose her own faith later on?
nokklav said:that bow dress is a bit too much. that lady needs BOW HELP
Her_Majesty said:(and she doesn't wear many bows anymore)
Empress said:I completely agree that royal babies should have a special christening gow, I just do not find anything special about this particular christening gown at all. I think that it is just terrible. However, is the christening gown of the Dutch Royal family even available to them? That would be my question. If not then I can certainly understand the idea of getting a new one. Just not that one.
AliciaAnn said:I have three questions:
(1) Why are Zaria and Luana called Countesses and not Princesses?
(2) Why don't they go by their first names: Joanna and Emma?
(3) Is it my imagination or did Luana's Christening Gown have bows all over it like her Mom's Wedding Gown?
Thank You~
AliciaAnn said:I have three questions:
(1) Why are Zaria and Luana called Countesses and not Princesses?
(2) Why don't they go by their first names: Joanna and Emma?
(3) Is it my imagination or did Luana's Christening Gown have bows all over it like her Mom's Wedding Gown?
Thank You~
princess leonor said:....Amalia and Alexia don't go by their first names either, ....