,
The height is not a problem. Charlotte and Tintero did fine in the 6 bar competition at Bois le Roi last fall. They jumped over 1.60m.
FanofMonaco, I thought you were a rider? Maybe I am mistaken but I thought you were, based in some of your post.
If you are a jumping rider you must know that jumping over a 1.60 in a 3 jumps power competition has nothing to do with solving a 1.40 run. The 1.60 jump is much more easy. On a 3 jumps power competition what you have is a triple jump. I am sorry but I don't explain myself very well in english.
It's like a triple jump. You have first a lower jump, then a slighly higher one, and finallly a really high one, any of them just one stride away from the next one, like a triple jump. All you have to do is get your horse at the right pace to the first jump, and then you stay still and he will do everything else. If the horse has the power he will go over the 3 fences. Technically it's not something difficult. It is spectacular because of the height but not that difficult. Actually most riders don't do power competitions with their best horses, they save them for the real thing.
What I mean is that doing a 1.60 power competition is much much more easy than finishing a 1.40 CSI.
TrepStep you never give Charlotte any credit. When she does well it's because of her horse. When she does poorly it's her fault. It's a team sport and horses still can't read maps as far as I know.
Again, I am sorry but if you are a rider you must know that it makes perfect sense. The horse is 70% of the team. And Charlotte is not a brilliant rider. She is good for an amateur, but that's it. And yes, when she does well it is because she has a very good horse. A good horse can take a so-so rider to 1.30 no problem.
And when she fails it is her fault. The horse can easily do 1.40. He refuses to jump because of Charlotte's lack of skills.
A very good rider improves any horse performance. Charlotte does not have that level. The horses improve her performance.
So, yes, when she does well it is because of the horse, and when she does poorly it is her fault.
Oh, by the way, I've been saying that she is not ready to compete at that level for more than a year. Actually, I said she was going to fail BEFORE she started taking part in 1.40 shows. I don't only say it afterwards, which would be too easy. I don't change my mind depending of what happens.
She does good at 1.20.
She can manage at 1.30 because she's got very good horses. But she should keep on working on that level, she is not proficient enough.
She is not ready for 1.40. It's too much for her.
I'm sorry if that bothers anyone but I think it's pretty obvious.