Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Andrews's lease is a private lease, secured on commercial terms, on an arms length basis, between the Crown Estate and the Duke of York. The terms, including its duration, can be agreed by any member of the public. So I am not sure you can "stop making extended leases".
And as long as adheres to the agreement he is secure, whether that is sensible or not is another matter.
 
Yes, his lease is his business and National Audit Office reviewed all the Royal Family leases with the Crown estate and found them all to be above board.
The issue is, can Andrew meet the terms of that lease still? It seems the answer to that is, increasingly, not without support from his brother.
 
It was mentioned in a few places at the time





 
Yes, his lease is his business and National Audit Office reviewed all the Royal Family leases with the Crown estate and found them all to be above board.
The issue is, can Andrew meet the terms of that lease still? It seems the answer to that is, increasingly, not without support from his brother.
I believe that is true; I think Andrew will eventually have to concede and make a move. It would be much better for him to do so graciously, but I doubt Andrew is pragmatic enough to do so.
If he was, he'd have already made the best deal possible with Charles.
 
Here's another section of the book.

Interesting information about the Prince of Wales, Duke of Cornwall:

However, when it came to publishing tax and expenditure, the new Duke [of Cornwall] was less enthusiastic. Whereas his father had traditionally included these details in the Duchy [of Cornwall]'s annual report on a voluntary basis, Prince William opted for the minimum disclosure required. Here was a small but telling indicator of the different views of father and son on the issue of royal transparency.

[...]

[The Prince of Wales] had not hitherto shared his father's interest in faith and spiritualism, nor the late Queen's solid devotion to the Anglican communion. Might the health scares afflicting his wife and his father have led to a little soul-searching?

'No change of course there,' is the firm response from one who knows him well.

'He is a modern young man,' says another, 'and I think he gets embarrassed by certain aspects of ceremonial and religion.'

The Prince's position, say those in a position to know, is that, when the time comes, he will observe all his constitutional obligations to the Church of England. He will not, however, suddenly become a regular worshipper or feign an enthusiasm for something that he does not feel personally, however bleak the situation.

[...]

One veteran of the late Queen's era points to the Prince's intervention on Gaza in February and the lack of consultation with the Foreign Office as 'a worry'.

The Prince had called for 'an end to the fighting' and 'a desperate need' for humanitarian support. Though perfectly benign sentiments, they were not entirely in line with government policy. Senior Foreign Office sources now say that the Prince's statement had not been authorised. 'We were briefed it was happening,' says one, 'but we were certainly not asked in advance.'

However, the Palace veteran adds: 'I have to hand it to [William]. When he does appoint staff, he does choose very good people.'​
 
Back
Top Bottom