Empress
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,122
- Country
- United States
ysbel said:I too think its irresponsible for two young unmarried people to have a child without committing to their future, but with all the things that can go wrong in a pregnancy, surely the healthy birth of any baby is cause to celebrate. The child did not ask to be born; don't burden the child with the sins of the parents.
Sorry to be impertinent, but what who are we to judge what is or is not a sin? And if premarital sex is still a sin then I would be willing to bet that the great majority of the human beings on this earth are doomed to damnation!
Moonlightrhapsody said:It all depends on religion. The Grand Dukes are Roman Catholics. In the eyes of the Church, premarital sex is a sin. Having children out of wedlock is considered to be a taboo and a very grave situation to be in even in other cultures that are not Roman Catholics. It's a very touchy situation between a royal family and relgion. In some countries, like the UK, the church and ruler and intertwined. As a member of a royal family, like it or not, you are a role model for the rest of the country and the standards are a lot higher for you than for the common man.
I'm torn about this birth, really. As with the other posters, every birth of a child is a joyous one. They are gifts and should be received with happiness and gratitude. On the other hand, I have to think of this child's future and, shamefully for me, the circumstances of his birth. He is still illegitimate, and therefore, his position with the family is tenuous. If Louis marries someone else and has children with his wife, his firstborn might be pushed to the background. It's a sad thing, but it has happened before.
And about money? Yes, true that Gabriel will be set for life. However, the most important things in this life are things money can't buy. We never know what will happen in the future as to how he will be seen by the royals and by the people, through no fault of his own. The fact that he was born out od wedlock presents a lot of challenges for him in the future and money won't be able to save him in some circumstances.
I happen to be catholic, and in my view, the rules of the church are becoming somewhat more relaxed, if not publicly then at least in one on one conversations with one's pastor. Furthermore, one is certainly not likely to be excommunicated simply for having a child out of wedlock.
One more thing. While we may all agree or not agree the fact that the act itself was irresponsible is irrefutable, but it is done. And not even the Roman Catholic Church punishes children for the acts of his or her parents. I know this for a FACT as I was born to an unwed mother, and the Roman Catholic church still baptized me. So if the church, to which the child will most likely be part of and the family of the child do not see fit to visit anger, punishement or any other negative action or emotion on this child who are we to do so?????
Last edited by a moderator: