Asian Genealogies


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
B

Benjamin

Heir Presumptive
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
2,025
City
San Francisco
Country
United States
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great links!
 
does someone have any info about royalties and cheiftains of southeast asian coutries...
i just wanna know more about them
 
Are in the Asian Royal Genealogies also connections between each other like in Europe?
 
principessa said:
Are in the Asian Royal Genealogies also connections between each other like in Europe?
Click to expand...

Do you mean did they intermarry?

I think the Japanese & Korean Royal Families intermarried.
 
Brunei: The Sultan's Family

HM Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah (Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Al-Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah ibni Almarhum Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien Sa'adul Khairi Waddien, DOB: 15 July 1946) &

1st wife: HM Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha (HM Paduka Seri Duli Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha binti Al-Marhum Pengiran Pemancha Pengiran Anak Haji Mohamed Alam, born Pengiran Anak Saleha, DOB: 7 October 1946) - Married on 28 July 1965
children
1) HRH Princess Hajah Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri Hajah Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 26 July 1969 ) & YAM Pengiran Maharaja Setia Laila Diraja Shahibul Irshad PgAnak Hj Abdul Rahim (DOB: ) - Married on 15 August 1996
children
...a) YAM Pengiran Anak Raheemah Sanaul Bolkiah binti Pengiran Maharaja Setia Laila Diraja Sahibul Irshad Pengiran Anak Haji Abdul Rahim (DOB: 28 December 1997)
...b) YAM Pengiran Anak Hariisah Widadul Bolqiah binti Pengiran Maharaja Setia Laila Diraja Sahibul Irshad Pengiran Anak Haji Abdul Rahim
...c) YAM Pengiran Anak Abdul Raqiib bin Pengiran Maharaja Setia Laila Diraja Sahibul Irshad Pengiran Anak Haji Abdul Rahim (DOB: 14 May 2002)
...d) YAM Pengiran Anak Abdul Haseeb bin Pengiran Maharaja Setia Laila Diraja Shahibul Irshad Pg Anak Hj Abdul Rahim (DOB: 14 January 2006)

2) HRH Crown Prince Haji Al-Muhtadee Billah (Duli Yang Teramat Mulia Paduka Seri Pengiran Muda Mahkota Haji Al-Muhtadee Billah, DOB: 17 February 1974) & Crown Princess Sarah (Yang Teramat Mulia Paduka Seri Pengiran Anak Isteri Sarah, DOB: 9 April 1987) - Married on 9 September 2004
children
...a) Prince Muda'Abdul Muntaqim (Yang Teramat Mulia Pengiran Muda'Abdul Muntaqim DOB: 17 March 2007)

3) HRH Princess Hajah Muta-wakillah Hayatul Bolkiah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri Hajah Muta-Wakkilah Hayatul Bolkiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 12 October 1971)

4) HRH Princess Hajah Majeedah Nuurul Bulqiah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri Hajah Majeedah Nuurul Bolkiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 16 March 1976) & Yang Amat Mulia Pengiran Anak Khairul Khalil (DOB: 28 Feb 1975) - Married on 14 June 2007

5) HRH Princess Hajah Hafizah Sururul Bolkiah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri Hajah Hafizah Sururul Bolkiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 12 March 1980)

6) HRH Prince Abdul Malik (HRH Pengiran Muda 'Abdul Malik ibni Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 30 June 1983)

2nd wife (Divorced): Former Pengiran Isteri Hajah Mariam binti Haji Abdul Aziz (DOB: ) - Married on 28 October 1981, Divorced in February 2003
children
1) HRH Prince Abdul Azim, (HRH Pengiran Muda Haji 'Abddul 'Azim ibni Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 29 July 1982)

2) HRH Princess Hajah Azemah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri 'Azemah Ni'matul Bolkiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 26 September 1984)

3) HRH Princess Hajah Fadzilah (HRH Pengiran Anak Puteri Fadzilah Lubabul Bulqiah binti Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 23 August 1985)

4) HRH Prince Abdul Mateen (HRH Pengiran Muda 'Abdul Mateen ibni Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Mu'izzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 10 August 1991)

3rd wife: HRH Pengiran Isteri Azrinaz Mazhar (DOB: 28 September 1979) - Married on 20 August 2005
children
1) HRH Prince 'Abdul Wakeel (HRH Pengiran Muda 'Abdul Wakeel ibni Kebawah Duli Yang Maha Mulia Paduka Seri Baginda Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah Muizzaddin Waddaulah, DOB: 1 June 2006)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Prince Of Kambhuja

Hello, I am get the geneology are the lineage Cambodian Royal.I think all the script were derive from Sanskrit or Indian language. Because it's one of the country Orientation by Indo Civilization also in SEAC.
6th century: Bhavavarman I
6th century: Mahendravarman
7th century: Isanavarman I
7th century: Bhavavarman II
7th century: Jayavarman I
8th century: Queen Jayavedi
Reign unknown: Sambhuvarman
Reign unknown: Pushkaraksha
8th century: Sambhuvarman
8th century: Rajendravarman I
Reign unknown: Mahipativarman
802-850: Jayavarman II
850-877: Jayavarman III
877-889: Indravarman I
889-900: Yasovarman I
900-922: Harshavarman I
922-928: Isanavarman II
928-942: Jayavarman IV
942-944: Harshavarman II
944-968: Rajendravarman II
968 - 1001: Jayavarman V
1001-1002: Udayadityavarman I
1002: Jayaviravarman
1002-1050: Suryavarman I
1050-1066: Udayadityavarman II
1066-1090: Harshavarman III
1090-1107: Jayavarman VI
1107-1113: Dharanindravarman I
1113-1150: Suryavarman II
The Angkor Wat was built.

1150-1160: Dharanindravarman II
1160-1166: Yasovarman II
1166-1177: Tribhuvanadityavarman
From 1177 to 1181, Cham invasion and period of anarchy.

1181-1219: Jayavarman VII
1219-1243: Indravarman II
1243-1295: Jayavarman VIII
1295-1308: Indravarman III
1308-1327: Indrajayavarman
1327-1353: Jayavarman Paramesvara
The throne was vacant from 1353 to 1362.

1362-1369: Nippean Bat
From 1369 to 1375, Siam ruled. From 1369 to 1371, the throne was vacant.

1371 - ?: Kalamegha
14th century: Kambujadhitaja
14th century: Dharmasokaraja
In the 14th century, ownership of Cambodia passed to Siam, until 1389.

1389-1404: Ponthea Yat
1404-1429: Narayana Ramadhipati
1429-1444: Sri Bodhya
In 1431, Siam defeated and crushed the Angkorean Empire. Nonetheless, The monarchy was not harmed, and Siam withdrew. The capital (and the royal family) moved from Angkor to Phnom Penh.

1444-1486: Dharmara Jadhiraja
1486-1512: Sri Sukonthor
1512-1516: Ney Kan
1516-1566: Ang Chan I
1566-1576: Barom Reachea I
1576-1594: Chettha I
In 1594, the Siamese captured Phnom Penh, yet the monarchy continued to rule.

1594-1596: Reamea Chung Prey
1596-1599: Barom Reachea II
1599-1600: Barom Reachea III
1600-1603: Chau Ponhea Nhom
1603-1618: Barom Reachea IV
1618-1622: Chettha II
1622-1628: Interregnum: Civil strife
1628: Ponhea To
1628-1630: Outey
1630-1640: Ponhea Nu
1640-1642: Ang Non I
1642-1659: Chan
1659-1672: Barom Reachea V
1672-1673: Chettha III
1673-1674: Ang Chei
1674-1675: Ang Non
1675-1695: Chettha IV (first reign)
1695-1699: Outey I
1699-1701: Ang Em (first reign)
1701-1702: Chettha IV (second reign)
1702-1703: Thommo Reachea II (first reign)
1703-1706: Chettha IV (third reign)
1706-1710: Thommo Reachea III (second reign)
1710-1722: Ang Em (second reign)
1722-1738: Satha II
1738-1747: Thommo Reachea II (third reign)
1747: Thommo Reachea III
1747-1749: Ang Tong (first reign)
1749-1755: Chettha V
1755-1758: Ang Tong (second reign)
1758-1775: Outey II
1775-1796: Ang Non II
1796-1806: Interregnum: Vietnamese and Siamese do not allow King Ang Chan II to be crowned
1806-1837: Ang Chan II
1837-1847: Queen Ang Mey
1841-1860: Ang Duong
1860-1904: Norodom
1904-1927: Sisowath
1927-1941: Sisowath Monivong
1941-1955: Norodom Sihanouk
1955-1960: Norodom Suramarit
 
Last edited:
does anyone know where to find the geneology of the Japan royal family???
 
principessa said:
Are in the Asian Royal Genealogies also connections between each other like in Europe?
Click to expand...

distantly, but yes. Toghun, a son of Khubilai Khan m. An Tu, a daughter of King Tran Thai Tong of Vietnam. Cousins of Khubilai married into European nobility
 
principessa said:
Are, in the Asian Royal Genealogies, also, connections between each other like in Europe?
Click to expand...

The answer, from my general knowledge, is no. Yet, there are exceptions like Japan and Korea. And a number of Asia's royal families do have Chinese blood. But, as a general rule Asian royal families have not intermarried as the nobility do in Europe.
 
Family Tree of China's Current Royal Family

CHINA

The last Chinese Royal Family to actually rule China was the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Their family surname is Chun. During the ending portion of the Ming Dynasty, China coming out of 162 years of foreign rule of China by Mongolians, China's Imperial or Royal Court made a decision to continue China's official Han-Chinese succession, rather than to accept Manchurian rule of China.

In the 1610s to 1620s, marriage alliances were forged between the Chun clan and the Chow clan of China to strengthen the Ming Dynasty. When the dynasty fell to foreign conquest by Manchurians, Court installed CHOU Shun Cheong as its official emperor, as a reward to the Chou Dynasty for their support of the Ming Dynasty, and continued China's Han-Chinese Imperial mandate. 1644 to 2010.

The royal family of China is then not Manchurian, but of Han-Chinese ancestry.

http://zhoudynasty.freewebsites.com/


:crown:
 
Isn't it true though that many Chinese emperors were the sons of concubines of whatever rank or status.
 
Hereditary Thane said:
Isn't it true though that many Chinese emperors were the sons of concubines of whatever rank or status.
Click to expand...

Yes. It's my understanding that one or two wives were the official wife and consort and that the others were called 'concubines' or something like it but a wife.
 
A Decent Man And His Postings (See my posting below)

Hereditary Thane said:
Isn't it true though that many Chinese emperors were the sons of concubines of whatever rank or status.
Click to expand...
Yes. It's my understanding that one or two wives were the official wife and consort and that the others were called 'concubines' or something like it but a wife.

-----

H.I.M. Yao Sui, says, I am under the belief that people posting here are supposed to be civil and to not dun or bad mouth other people. We are supposed to live in a civil world, where personal arguments and petty squabbles are not the order of the day. what I was told many times by many people is that in life "Life is not fair!" Winners get their things published and losers, no matter how true or benevolent do not receive the time of day. Are slandered and smashed, so their truths do not surface or see the light of day.

The winners in life, if they are good people will allow goodness to surface and to shine.

Evil people on the other hand will put down true goodness so as to exalt their own selfish agenda and victories.

I on the other hand do publish both sides of the issue to educate the people. My family has been like this (acting as good and honorable people) for centuries.

On my posting above, though I boast of my heritage, I acknowledge China's Ch'ing and Ming Dynasties. The Ch'ing Dynasty is a foreign dynasty and not a Chinese dynasty of people. During the Ming Dynasty, my family made alliances with the major princes of the Ming, Chun family surname, and when the Ming Dynasty ended in 1644, my grandfather of that time period was recognized and exalted, installed officially by court as China's official Han-Chinese emperor.

I post to inform. I post because I have a good Christian mission. Why would any man or royal slander the good intentions of myself and of my family? Any royals posting here?


:noevil:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question asked by China's official and Han-Chinese succession emperor

norenxaq said:
http://zhoudynasty.freewebsites.com/
stay away from the above site as it contains wrong and misleading information
Click to expand...
I read about Portugal's king here in this forum and while postings contained were both positive and negative, the comments were civil and non-abusive. My family's genealogy website contains true information taken from family genealogy records and from the Zhongguo Tongshi Gangyao, edited by Bai Shouyi, November 1980. Then Head of the Department of History and Head of the Institute of History at Beijing Teachers University. Over 40 years of teaching experience, Professor Bai is a member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, a member of the Presidium of the Chinese Society of Historians, and President of the Beijing Society of Historians. So, I don't see how anyone could slam my family's good name?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
norenxaq said:
if anyone is interested in their genealogy as well as other se asian royalty, see my article at: https://www.academia.edu/36824221/A_Genealogy_of_Select_Southeast_Asian_Kingdoms
Click to expand...


Please add the monarchies of the Seven Sister states of northeast India like Tripura, Manipur, Cooch Behar (Koch Bihar), Jaintia, Kachari, Ahom and the three monarchies of the Chittagong Hill Tracts occupied by Bangladesh which are the Chakma Circle, Bohmong Circle and Mong Circle. I wrote a post on the monarchies of the Chittagong Hill Tracts in the thread about monarchies of the Indian subcontinent. Technically the Seven Sisters and Chittagong Hill Tracts are geographically and culturally part of Southeast Asia. Please read my post on the Chittagong Hill Tracts and bring attention to the genocide there as well as the brutal violent assault against the Chakma Queen.
 
Last edited:
india is beyond the scope of my article, so, no

you might consider researching this and publishing one instead
 
Northeast India and the Chittagong Hill Tracts are culturally and geographically Southeast Asia and the Assam and Manipur parts of Northeast India were under the control of Myanmar before the first Anglo Burmese war. The British arbitrarily decided that Myanmar's conquests in the region and the Chittagong Hill Tracts would be part of their Indian territories instead of Myanmar when separating them again before independence. I understand you can reject doing anything for any reason at all but please understand that these regions are Southeast Asian geographically and culturally. Politically they are part of entities based in the Indian subcontinent but not part of the subcontinent itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Family Bylaws Concerning the House Law of the House of Luxembourg-Nassau
Replies
1
Views
2K
Tatiana Maria
T
Toledo
African Royal Family Trees
Replies
0
Views
1K
Toledo
Toledo
R
New royal books in my collection
Replies
1
Views
730
ronald biver
R
Toledo
Empire and Kingdom of Haiti
Replies
1
Views
1K
Toledo
Toledo
R
King of Andorra
Replies
5
Views
2K
Blog Real
Blog Real

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom