Paternal rights and succession rights are different. Succession requires a marriage at some point.And as for Andrea and Tatiana - after the birth they simply will go together to register a child in the office, in order for Andrea to officially recognize it, and all paternal right are given.
Did they set a wedding date? I'm sure the pregnancy changes things.
Elektra said:Paris-Match paper version said the civil ceremony will take place during Spring 2013 probably in Monaco, and the religious wedding during Winter 2014 in Gstaad.
I never heard of such a thing. The catholic church does not refuse marriage on such grounds.
In the US they do.
You are correct about the Catholic Church in USA. It has been done a few times that I know of. They will gladly unite couple after child is over 6 months and both parents have gone through weeks of additional classes.I never heard of such a thing. The catholic church does not refuse marriage on such grounds.
In the US they do.
Yes, I have heard of that happening as well. I also know of friends of mine who were told 2 weeks before their scheduled wedding by their priest that he was refusing to marry them because they did not want to have children. Even after it was explained to the priest that she had been advised for health reasons by her doctor not to have children the priest still refused and when they appealed to the Bishop he told them he could not over rule a parish priest in this matter although he did later give them some money to compensate for some expenses they had incurred on the planned wedding. In the end they went to another denomination to have their wedding and left the RC Church.I never heard of such a thing. The catholic church does not refuse marriage on such grounds.
In the US they do.
The theory behind this whole thing is 'If you are not going to follow the rules of the religion, why do you want a religious wedding. At the present time, in our parish, if couples are living together, they must move apart before they can begin marriage preparation. It had become a hugh mess. You wouldn"t see people in church for years and then they would show up wanting to marry, or have a baby baptized. Either you believe in a faith or you don"t, but don"t be a hypocrite and just use the Church for ceremonies.
And they were quite right to do so. That priest is an idiot. How do you tell someone two weeks before their wedding it's not going to happen? Invitations had gone out weeks earlier. I'd also like to know who enlightened the priest as to their procreation plans? Further, I would have replied 'Well God is the one who gave me these health issues. He must not want me to procreate'.Yes, I have heard of that happening as well. I also know of friends of mine who were told 2 weeks before their scheduled wedding by their priest that he was refusing to marry them because they did not want to have children. Even after it was explained to the priest that she had been advised for health reasons by her doctor not to have children the priest still refused and when they appealed to the Bishop he told them he could not over rule a parish priest in this matter although he did later give them some money to compensate for some expenses they had incurred on the planned wedding. In the end they went to another denomination to have their wedding and left the RC Church.
I believe you are all far too much surprised. Has this really shocked you? Extramarital children are nothing new in Monaco's princely history. Casiraghi's own uncle, a monarch, fathered [at least] two children by two different women without being in a [serious] relationship with either of them. Andrea Casiraghi, a private citizen, is having a child with a woman he has been in a relationship with for the past seven years and whom he plans to marry. What's all the fuss about?
Yes, she confirmed it yesterday at the Telva Awards. The child will be born in January.
Tatiana Santo Domingo embarazada, Carolina de Mónaco será abuela
Translation
Babies out of wedlock are certainly not a shock any longer. What surprised me was the ensuing sudden "engagement".I believe you are all far too much surprised. Has this really shocked you?
No fuss, merely curiosity. We don't know he had planned to marry her at all. As you pointed out, they have been in a relationship for seven years so, what changed?Andrea Casiraghi, a private citizen, is having a child with a woman he has been in a relationship with for the past seven years and whom he plans to marry. What's all the fuss about?
Yes i agree! I think that's the reason of the wedding, too!Don't you think that because of Tatiana's pregnancy they decided to marry? They're going to be a family (not just a copule any more) so the weeding is very approriate in this moment. and don't tell me that marriage is of no importance these days because it is oboviously a ground for stable family life and a sense of security for children
All that sound very likely to me !The relationship seems to have been running out of steam for the past several years.There was even some speculation on several other blogs that they had broken up. I think the pregnancy has decided the marriage issue for them-fortunately or unfortunately.My feeling too...
I understand that there is to be a space of at least a year between the civil and religious ceremonies and while that is odd, it does not surprise me at all. In fact it confirms my suspicions about the relationship and the unexpected nature of Tatiana's pregnancy. The civil ceremony gets them married and gives them time to test whether or not the marriage appears likely to last...that way they can avoid the messy, time consuming process of appealing to the Vatican for an annulment that would have been necessary if they'd married in Church. Very sad
All that sound very likely to me !