Search results

Joachim's kids remaining in the public eye is absolutely something that would be relevant. They are in the public eye because they are "royals". As they no longer have this formal association, then they are now free agents who can do and say whatever they want, in addition to making whatever...

Yes, in paperwork and fees all things are equitable. However when it comes to QMII's grandchildren and, say, the examples quoted above, the situations reflect how different and strange the former's situation actually is. They must go through the same process as everyone else for a name change...

I think this is ultimately about their "name" rather than the title for title sake, but of course I could be totally wrong... This I seriously doubt - especially for the older two.

First of all, thank you to the posters who took the time to answer my newbie questions.? It seems that the central issue is not if Joachim's children should have a prince/princess title but the fact that it was given and taken away. There just does not seem to be any defensible reason why...

This! It seems pretty clear that titles are everything to royalty. It has to be - what else would differentiate them for everyone else in this day and age when their role is more emotional than functional? I don't really know much about the Danish Royal Family (but this actually making the...