Search results

It is extremely low class to even bring up the topic of Meghan's ancestral relatives from as late as the 1850s in America, whom could have been slaves. What does that have to do with a woman who was born in 1982? Nothing! Is this how desperate people have become in trying to diminish this...

I'll be going a step further; I'm planning to be in London for the wedding and celebrate there. With all the craziness going on in the world these days, a royal wedding will be a fun occasion for the majority of people to celebrate. :smile:

The Gossip Cop are trying to deflect attention from the real reason why Meghan suddenly closed down The Tig. The Daily Mail and other gossip outlets have misused and taken out of context the postings made at The Tig. Reading the tea leaves in regards to every innocent, quirky post made...

Yes she does. Meghan can help direct character development, and if she doesn't want any scenes with her in underwear, lingerie, or anything extremely sexual, she will not do it. She is just no mere actress anyone, she's a public figure in a serious relationship with the last available prince...

Exactly, character assassination is a deliberate attempt by trolls and the media entities lacking ethics, to tear down a person they want to dislike. When it comes to the topic of Meghan, the negativity about her is coming from unstable people on the internet hell bent on spreading...

They will be engaged before the end of 2017, married in 2018, and have their first child in 2019.

I agree, there's no hysteria now, but there is a curiosity. If they get engaged, that curiosity on the American side will at least quadruple though. :biggrin: Meghan is unlike any woman a bachelor royal from the British Royal Family has ever dated, let alone socialize publicly with, so there...

Because, it's their CELEBRITY that help bring even MORE attention to human misery. If you or I wrote the article that Meghan wrote, we'd be lucky to blog about it, or have a local paper mention it under the fold. But Meghan Markle's name got this worthy article in TIME magazine and the front...

Perhaps this very , very basic definition will help you understand "humanitarian" work: having concern for or helping to improve the welfare and happiness of people. got it?

Agreed, until Meghan becomes a member of the BRF, a separate thread about her here is not justified. However, I have opened up a new message board titled About Meghan, so if anyone is interested in visiting, please pm for the link.

I'm sure Meghan has been introduced to Harry's brother and sister in law. I know it's difficult for some people to embrace Meghan, but, she's here to stay and eventually will become a member of the BRF.

I think some people just want this relationship to be a mere fling - which this is not. Both Prince Harry and Meghan are too old for such games and they are full fledged dating until an engagement takes this relationship to an entirely new level. The sooner that time comes, the more we will...

Thank you for writing this. Some people desperately want to diminish this relationship and resort to referring to it as a rebound relationship, and pathetically worse, a "booty call". :huh: The sooner some in the general public recognize that there is something genuinely deep and long term...

A Marie Claire article explains why Harry needs the Queen's approval before he can marry Meghan. They don't mention the Privy Council. This why Prince Harry needs The Queen's permission to get married

LOL! That's sweet you were that optimistic about an engagement and spring wedding. My initial thoughts were a spring engagement announcement, and a fall 2017 wedding, but now it may be a summer engagement and a spring 2018 wedding - due to Pippa's wedding and I think Beatrice is engaged too.

As I understand it, I believe that Prince Harry is the Queen's favorite grandchild, and perhaps she is very happy that at the moment, he appears to have found the perfect girl. The Queen won't be around forever, so I presume that she will give her approval this year at the time that is most...

I couldn't agree more. Especially where Prince Harry is concerned, if he really found the right woman, those in the public, (i.e., mere commoners), have no say in who he marries. As long as they both are happy and in love and support each other, that's all that matters. It's a sad state for...

Well, a lot of people will be upset when Harry marries Meghan, but a lot more will be very happy for the couple. For those who don't want to watch the festivities, that is fine as tens of millions of people will, and I will be one of them. It's my belief that Meghan has been prepped for the...

I agree with this, Harry's wedding will be a big deal. Also, keep in mind that his wedding will be the last one to be worthy of being televised (or at least garner great attention) until Prince George or Princess Charlotte get married, and that's a good 25+ years away. So, the monarchy and the...

I totally agree. If Meghan becomes a member of the RF, she will need to be fully committed and assimilated into the British way of life. She's probably already been asked this very question about if she's willing to give up her American citizenship. For them to be dating over six months now, I...

Thanks! It's all a pipedream at that moment until everything is made official, which may or may not even happen. Since I was in London last June, I was thinking of visiting this coming October to spend time with my friend. But if an engagement happens, I'll put that October visit on hold and...

Well to each their own. Your extremely negative view of Prince Harry and Meghan's relationship is unfortunate, but while you're on one end of extreme opinion, I'm on the other. I plan to schedule my annual visit to London to coordinate with their wedding as I want to be a proud Anglophile...

Well, if you're like me, you will tweet and/or post the link to this apology on your facebook to share with as many people as possible. It's ridiculous that they post this apology at 12am GMT. Spread the word and share the link before it's buried in the morning edition.

Looks like the Sun is offering a mea culpa so they can cover the wedding. To take this woman's professional work on a popular TV show and associate it with a porn site is pathetic. I'm glad they apologized, but, is it too late?

Well surely this will be discussed with the bride and groom beforehand. And let's remember that at a private event like a society wedding, there will be professional photographers there, not the Daily Mail/Sun papparazzi, so there's no fear of having the moment taken away from the bride and...