Search results

What’s funny is that she’s somehow overshadowing the Diana Awards themselves, and I’m not sura that it’s a smart move regarding “this one”’s interests.

I am so sorry for your loss, shady lady!

I think it was scripted, but, yeah, I’ve seen it also as baiting.

They aleays do a photo of this style for Mothering Sunday.

Yeah, no, now it is “it’s an old photo”, “it’s photoshopped”, “where is William?”, “no rings!”, “Louis’ fingers!!!”. Endless.

Then these are topics she could have included. Speaking about herself again doesn’t help to shed the victimhood narative. (Let’s not go to what’s happening right now on SM with the princess.)

The live blog from the telegraph with her interventions. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/03/08/watch-live-duchess-sussex-women-media-austin-texas/

Of course it is thanks to her husband’s wealth.

These people had something priceless on their side: talent and endurance. I am not sue she has any.

Actually reckless behaviour. “The letter revealed that “a thorough review” of the incident had taken place and although no formal charges were brought against anyone involved at the time “we did conclude that the behaviour in question was reckless. As a result, [redacted text], beginning with...

And Harry’s going to appeal https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/02/28/prince-harry-high-court-personal-security-case-live-updates/

And the article in The Times. https://archive.is/sNkIA

Semi-reliable “Semi-Reliable Sources The Daily Mail Daily Mirror / Sunday Mirror Daily Express The Sun Vanity Fair People Magazine” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13061765/Meghan-Markle-seen-family-photos-happy-childhood-cousin.html

I’ve just read this one: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13096041/Prince-Harry-blocked-having-heart-heart-Charles-Palace-aides.html The telegraph has this one: https://archive.is/9aYCo And The Sunday Times has a very acid one but, as it is an opinion piece, i can only offer to PM it.

Then it should go both ways. And he is, as you very well say, responsible for his words and actions.

Yeah, but to put it in the blurb…

Apparently Harry will be on GMA today to talk about Invictus AND King Charles’ cancer. Colour me surprised. Not.

If I understand correctly, the message is from the “article” site, the company that built the sussex site (and tig, archewell and sussexroyal). And it is not clear when it was published. I presume after the site went live, otherwise the tabloids would have unearthed it before. If all of this is...

It is her own statement. It should be clear enough to stand on its own.

Meghan issued a statement regarding the new site. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13083011/Duchess-Sussex-breaks-silence-defend-new-Sussex-com-site-rebrand-criticism.html#comments-13083011

Hmmm…Excellent perspective.. Romanian is a latin language also so it is normal to articulate the noun. The article is attached at the end of the word: prince = prinț, the prince = prințul. And it is normal to articulate it for Michael of Kent also.

Yes, I forgot the “The”, thank you! It sounds bizzare without HRH. “Ladies and gentlemen, the next award will be presented by The Prince Harry.”

I “think” it would be Prince Henry Mountbatten Windsor (no “of something”). The only one I can think of is Prince Michael of Kent, being the second son of the duke of Kent. But I cannot believe Harry would want or be permitted to call himself “of the United Kingdom” or “of Lancaster”, his father...

Did he ask anyone to put him up?

Beatrice cannot act as counselor either.