Yes I do. He was a 12 year old child in denial that his Mother was dead and he also belonged to a dysfunctional family who couldn't support him so he turned to drugs and drink. If his account of his father breaking the news of Diana's death to him is accurate then I am utterly appalled. Imagine telling a child such news and then leaving them alone for ages. Unfortunately I do believe that Charles did exactly that.
how was he left alone for ages? he was with his brother, he went to church with his family a few hours after learning of Diana's death. He was not alone... Charles' old nanny was there, probalby in a room nearby. And Charles sent for his own recent nanny, Tiggy Legge Bourke, to help console him, and he was in the castle with several cousins of his own age who were there to try and help him.
I cant see how that excuses making spiteful fun of a lady at his school, who was disabled, and still laughing about it nearly 30 years later. that had nothing to do with his family... that was his own choice as an adult to still behave like a nasty bratty child. And as someone else has just said, he believed for 10 yrs after Di's death that she had faked her death. THat does indeed argue a serious instability on his part. What does it say about his relationship wiht his mother? That he thought that she would willingly leave him without her, and go on living apart form im for 10 years? He also mentioned that he felt that it would have been perfectly safe for Di's car to drive too fast into the tunnel EVEN IF the driver had had drink taken. That is hardly very sensible commentary is it?