MyAdia
Nobility
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 254
- City
- ***
- Country
- United States
Again, you are assuming then that she and Felipe (of course I am not talking about her first husband) didn't have sex before they got married (which by the way is the desired behavior in the Catholic teachings and many other religious teachings). If they did, would you rebuke them?Genevieve said:By Leti I presume you mean Princess Letizia of Spain. Letizia was married before Felipe so any sex she might have had would have been with her husband so that certainly isn't the same as what Louis and Tessy did.
I did not attack you, I commented on your extremely hypocritical comment. Please show me what words that I wrote which were a personal attack on you.Genevieve said:No need to attack me for my comment please.
If Louis wanted forgiveness for his sins (and any other of his siblings that may have had pre-marital sex), then the Vatican is the right place to be. I do hope you uinderstand the simple fact I am trying to convey to you.
I'll spell it out.
1) Yes, an out-of-wedlock child is definite proof that Louis engage in pre-marital sex - which is a sin in the Catholic belief.
2) Just because neither of his siblings (which you DID NOT questioned their right to be there) has not produced an out-of-wedlock child DOES NOT mean they haven't engaged in pre-marital sex - which is a sin in the Catholic belief.
This is all I was trying to convey. I'll leave and let you continue with your rebuke of Louis..
Last edited: