REAL COUNTESS
Courtier
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2020
- Messages
- 637
- City
- tacoma
- Country
- United States
Maybe a few anger issues from the EX?
Maybe a few anger issues from the EX?
The ex-wife may also be getting some monetary "help" from the Sheikh to publicize the story and further put Haya in a bad light.
My point exactly. Feels like a UAE paid article in line with the Weekly Bliz tabloids in 2019 that talked about Hayas previous sexlife etc.
Everyone knows weekly bliz is a tabloid paid by Sheikh Mohammed. So they are trying new ones
"The friend" is supposed to be a family friend of the bodyguard and his ex-wife.
No nobody knows that,, but apparently you and a few others do! Don’t state it like it’s a fact
If you look at twitter on #princesshaya you will see mostly Indian magasins running the story. And we know how the UAE and India cohoted in the Princess Latifa case.... Smoke and fire....
Read weekly blitz articles you will get your answer.
I don’t read these kind of papers, but still you are stating your opinion on assumptions not on facts.
You believe anything against Princess Haya but when it comes to Sheikh Mohammed you have a lot of doubts but then it's totally up to you what you believe not I just post the link and the weekly blitz is total garbage who post articles about Princess Haya as if she did something to them that backed by no evidence. I am not saying I am stating facts it's an assumption that the lady friend of the bodyguard's ex-wife is paid by Sheikh Mohammed to create more drama.
2. Princess Haya is Royalty but not all royalties are rich , when she married Shiekh Mohammed she was in debt ( remember that her father died and she fled with her trainer to Spain ) Shiekh of Oman used to help her with her bills.
The Source of this rumor is Arab Times , and the writer of this electronic newspaper is political opponent of Hashemite family in Jordan and Many Arab Ruling Families. This newspaper style is spreading rumors about Princess and Sheikhas to make them look bad without giving evidences and proofs (ex; Princess fled with her trainer). Arab Times also wrote that Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum loved princess Haya and was planing to propose her but Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum proposed to Princess Haya first. (What do you think about this news ??)
Princess Haya CV
https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/webcontent/wfp094966.pdf
1985-1995 she was in UK for education and graduated in June 1995 with an
Honors Degree BA MA, in P.P.E. (Politics, Philosophy and
Economics.)
In the years 1995- 2002, Princess Haya competed
internationally world wide at an average of 39 International
Competitions a year.
• 1995 – 1997, Ireland: the late Paul Darragh / Alain
Storme
• 1995 – 1997, Ireland: Tommy stack (amateur flat race
jockey)
• 1997 – 1999, Germany: Paul Schockemohle
• 1999 – 2000, Holland: Hans Horn
• 2000 – 2001, France: Katie Monahan Prudent / Alice
Debany Clero
• 2001 - 2002, France: Patrick Caron
Princess Haya spend her youth in Europe and trained with many showjumping trainer but after taking her family permission as she said in her in interview with The Irish Time in August,1996
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/princess-on-horseback-1.73690
ِAlso she accompanied her father in his treatment journey 1998
as she mentioned in this interview
Sheikh Mo hacked Hayas Phone during the divorce hearings in court:
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/...-princess-haya-hacked-uk-high-court-says?s=09
In his judgment, Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the UK High Court's family division, criticised Sheikh Mohammed in the strongest terms.
“The findings represent a total abuse of trust, and indeed an abuse of power, to a significant extent,” he said.
“I wish to make it plain that I regard the findings that I have now made to be of the utmost seriousness in the context of the children’s welfare.
"They may well have a profound impact upon the ability of the mother and of the court to trust him with any but the most minimal and secure arrangements for contact with his children in the future.”
Haya’s phone was hacked 11 times in July and August last year with Sheikh Mohammed’s “express or implied authority”, the Guardian revealed.
Two of Haya's lawyers were also hacked, including Lady Shackleton, a member of the House of Lords.
In March, MacFarlane ruled that Sheikh Mohammed was keeping his daughters Latifa and Shamsa captive and has conducted a campaign of harassment against Princess Haya.
Sheikh Mohammed was also found to have organised the kidnapping of Latifa, who attempted to flee Dubai in 2018, and her older sister Shamsa, who in 2000 temporarily escaped her family in the UK.
It seems Sheikh Mohammed's behaviour is that of an absolute tyrant that bows to no man, no law and no country other than his own which he, of course, rules as he wants. He is obviously one of those people that makes all the decisions for his family, be it wives or children.
In committing a crime, by ordering his ex-wife's phone and even those of her legal team, shows that he has no respect for any law but his own, e.g. ordering the kidnapping of Princess Shamsa who was kidnapped off the street in Cambridge and Princess Latifa, who was abducted by members of the Indian Military in international waters in what has been called an arms trade.
Strangely, for all his criminal activities, he is not exactly persona non grata in the UK. Funny what a few Trillion dollars can buy.
It seems Sheikh Mohammed's behaviour is that of an absolute tyrant that bows to no man, no law and no country other than his own which he, of course, rules as he wants. He is obviously one of those people that makes all the decisions for his family, be it wives or children.
In committing a crime, by ordering his ex-wife's phone and even those of her legal team, shows that he has no respect for any law but his own, e.g. ordering the kidnapping of Princess Shamsa who was kidnapped off the street in Cambridge and Princess Latifa, who was abducted by members of the Indian Military in international waters in what has been called an arms trade.
Strangely, for all his criminal activities, he is not exactly persona non grata in the UK. Funny what a few Trillion dollars can buy.
If I´d want to nitpick I´d say that while Princess Haya obviously did what she did we hardly are in a position to know if she, at any time, had any problems of any sort with doing that, or not. That put aside, you are certainly absolutely right. I´d like to understand, though, if you just want to sum up the facts here in order for everybody to catch up or if are you implying something more?Still, Haya had no problem to marry and have children with a man of such reputation and be part of his power network (FEI president, the 'western wife'), until she became the target herself.
The sad perspective is that these children and their mother will never have a normal life as they will fear for ever. A man who is able to kidnap his own daughter in middle of the street of a foreign democratic country and nothing happened to empeach him, is fully able to do anything at any moment. He has the evilness, the time and the money to develop and execute his avenge. He kidnapped twice an adult he can do again. One day his kids will go out of their now protected life they will go at university or sport area or for a night life. He is able to harm them then. Which army of security guards would they need to feel and be safe? This fear will accompany them for ever. Maybe when Al Jalila gets married will lose interest for him, but not sure.Princess Haya is justified in fearing her children will be snatched
Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, poses a 'very significant threat' to his ex-wife and Al Jalila, 13, and Zayed, nine, a judge has said.www.dailymail.co.uk
Princess Haya is 'fully' justified in fearing her children will be snatched from their English country home by their sheikh father's henchmen in a helicopter, High Court judge says
If I´d want to nitpick I´d say that while Princess Haya obviously did what she did we hardly are in a position to know if she, at any time, had any problems of any sort with doing that, or not. That put aside, you are certainly absolutely right. I´d like to understand, though, if you just want to sum up the facts here in order for everybody to catch up or if are you implying something more?