pollyemma said:
honestly, the portrait is ok.it looks like her. but I think it looks like it could have been made by a highschool student.
its not great art in any sense.
With due respect pollyemma,
Can I assume from your post that you are infact in a position to state whether or not it is great art? (I am not wishing to question your personal opinion).
And I have to say that I was a little ataken back by the fact you said it looks like it has been painted by a highschool student. Its artist, Mr Jiawei Shen was an official & most destinguished portrait painter for the Chinese Communist Government before migrating to Australia. This indavidual is a most brilliant & skilled painter who has been officially recognised for his works, and to retort that it looks like it were produced by a highschool student, is most definitly an insult to Mr Shen.
Beatrixfan,
At first (before the portrait was unveiled) I too thought that a parure would have been wonderful. But after seeing the finished product I must say that its better without one. The gown (personally, not one of my favourites) is quite busy around the midriff and with the most Noble Order of the Elephant sash, star and family order I (personally) feel that any jewels (apart from Her Royal Highness' earings & blue topaz ring) would have over exagerated the piece greatly.
I do however think that the portrait that is either being or has been commissioned in Denmark, shall most probably have the Queen Desiree parure or Wedding tiara. It would be amazing if the Crown Princess was painted in her blood red, off the shoulder evening gown from the Canberra Sate dinner with the Desiree parure.
That combination would be awe inspiring.
Kind regards to you both,
"MII"