Search results

Apparently Markle showed up at Oprah's house to hand off a note asking to be interviewed in response to Meghan and Harry's. Funny he didn't stop by the Sussexes who live a mile down the road from Oprah. Markle wants to tell his side of of the story to Oprah. He had four years to slam Meghan...

Meghan has been bashed by the UK press for four years for various reasons. Race did play a role. Adding on weaponizing Meghan's disgruntled and greedy relatives... Add this into the mix: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/03/12/uk/meghan-race-britain-gbr-intl/index.html?__twitter_impression=true...

[...] That's rich of ANL to complain of doctored headlines when it printed select parts of Meghan's letter to her dad without her permission. It seems like ViacomCBS's stance is ANL is in no position to say anything given it lost that case.

The White House has weighed in, which surprises me...

s were on the outta kes and CBS showed them this morning. They got clobbered...

With all the nasty stories on Meghan that were out before the interview the "rebuttals" aren't gaining traction. CBS is pushing the rebuttals are coming and the interview hasn't aired. Wait until it comes out then refute. You're damaging your credibility.

Thomas Markle is set to be on GMB after the interview. The Sun said ITV sent Markle interview footage to CBS. The Sun (yeah I know) thinks the footage is going be aired to grill Meghan. The other possibility is CBS fact checking what has been said; and if there are inconsistencies they will...

So the Sussexes won't be involved in this process; not allowed to respond. This has the feel of a kangaroo court, despite being called s "review". And the Sussexes have fans outside the US.

Now 10 ex-aides are supposedly cooperating with the BP probe https://www.thedailybeast.com/ten-aides-ready-to-testify-in-meghan-markle-bullying-investigation-report-says Again the timing is suspect. They are anonymous. And no indication Meghan's lawyers can defend her in the process or cross...

People stating to be friends of Meghan went to US Weekly saying Meghan expected blowback from the Palace. As for the investigation Meghan better be able to formally answer the charges with a type of deposition if BP doesn't want the words "witch hunt" and "kangaroo court" tied to it through...

The alleged incident was two to three years ago; it's being investigated now? Several days before the Oprah interview? It looks suspect and it guaranteed more people will watch. CBS and ITV are getting free advertising from this stunt. I wonder if someone got a heads up what's in the...

The press went after the Sussexes went they kept quiet so they decided to fight back, so go for them.

Chris Ship was on GMB saying the alleged victims did not go to the Times or filed a complaint.

This was stupid of Knauf with this email, releasing it days before the Oprah interview. Announce to the world KP has the most to fear from this sit down. And the jewelry, it has been debunked. The earrings are not Meghan's; they are property of the Crown. Wait until the interview airs before...

For those in the media who promoted this book...did they read it before they booked Samantha?!

This is a review from Samantha's book along with excerpts from the Spectator https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/hellcat-on-the-loose-samantha-markle-rants-about-meghan I just can't...that is all.

I don't think the BRF is going to be dragged in this interview nor her family. It's timed for 90 minutes. [.....] This will get worldwide coverage so it will be a feather in Oprah's cap, not that she really needs it. And it is to air 5 days after the ruling for the settlement for Letter-gate...

A girl - Lloyce after Doria (her middle name)

Wonderful news for Harry and Meghan after what they went through. This baby with be eighth in line to the throne unless being born in the US knocks the child out of the succession. I can't see Harry and Meghan going back to the UK for her to give birth. (I wonder if that is why Meghan wanted...

I found the site where the judgment was printed in full www.judiciary.UK (Meghan still has HRH; it's referenced in the legal document) It's quite a read (53 pgs.) I skimmed through it; not only did the Mail get called out Meghan's father took some lumps too. I wonder if he would factor into...

Good for Meghan for winning. A lot of people thought she should have given up but I'm glad she stuck with her guns. This victory is not mentioned in the Mail (no surprise).

[.....] {Samantha Markle's} "book" comes out this week. Subjects so far: Pap-gate: Sam admits to getting the photographer for the staged photos of Dad but the deal is to make him look good. Fail Sam claims Meghan's first marriage ended because she cheated on him with a Suits costar...

So the Palace made the call to keep Meghan's name off.

I don't see the big deal on the birth certificate name update. I yet to see Letters Patent or Act of Parliament to officially strip Meghan of HRH. I believe she is called HRH the Duchess of Sussex in the lawsuit. So Meghan can legally be referred as HRH but not in commercial enterprises as...

Meghan is not obligated to pay Markle's bills unless it's court ordered. And if he only sees Harry as an ATM machine I would say would fracture any relationship. I would like to see the whole letter Meghan submitted to the High Court unredacted and made public. I have a feeling the excerpts...