Search results

The article is almost identical with the one in the DM! Daily Mail had just added some stirring the pot extras.

They were invited by the vice-president of Colombia.

It serms that the Colombia visit will happen this week. I link the DM article even though it’s not quite neutral because I didn’t find another source. “When Meghan Markle and Prince Harry touch down in Colombia this week for their second (…) tourthey will, no doubt, be hoping the trip will...

It’s just the translation. We all are God’s children in the eyes of the church.

I tried to stay away from this [....] interview but the fury is chocking me. Seriously, the ones who included Bouzy in their [documentary] are speaking about online abuse? The ones who picked an award for fighting racism only to say a few weeks later that there’s no racism are speaking about...

Indeed, there’s no bigger happiness than that on the day a baby is born.

Inviter. And it still doesn’t give away the substance of this visit.

Very interesting development. They have more limited choices than as working royals: as WR, it’s the FO the one that arranges the tours, according to the interests of the British government and the royals need to keep a completely politically neutral stance. As “private” royals, the Sussexes are...

There’s no evidence and I don’t think he did it that way, it could have been interpreted in a wrong way. It’s only the timeline that points to a coincidence, William had the settlement and soon after The Royal Foundation transfered money to Invictus as the two charities were separating.

Regarding the family joining Harry in his quest after the press: the family had a strategy about the press that Harry didn’t like and broke away from. He could very well join William in accepting compensation out of court, it was his choice to go to court. So, no, it’s not the family who didn’t...

He has to make up his mind. Either HLM, the head of the family, supported his fight with the media (big eyeroll, I have to look for my eyes behind the couch), or his fight with the media caused the rift with his family, rift that happened during her reign. But for the personal tweet of an idiot...

Does anyone know when will it be aired, the interview with ITV?

Meghan was seen leaving a restaurant. […] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13660067/Meghan-Markle-dons-crisp-white-245-shirt-12-800-Cartier-necklace-steps-Father-Bride-actress-Kimberly-Williams-Paisley-trendy-Italian-restaurant-Montecito.html

Except. I find diminishing for the veterans to be treated as a token in the tin world of entertainment. Also, there’s a mish-mash of wounded, not wounded, able, disabled and so on. More than anything, I believe it’s the government’s responsibily to take care of their recuperation, physical...

Except it’s not fake. People have the right to feel, to interpret, to categorize this as they seem appropriate. And, yes, I was thinking about it, this award, the ESPYs were probably completely unknown to anyone outside US, even ESPN. Now, thanks to the controversy, at least the royal watching...

The content of the article is very interesting. Funny to see how things have changed since April, when the article was published. As for Archewell producing content, ugh, as much as they are free to do as they please, I dislike them for meddling into politics, not even for “being British” or...

And Jake Wood came to defend the choice ESPY made, to give the award to Harry. Not to Invictus, to Harry. A lot of those under machinations make me remember something Harry said once, that there’s a lot of money in the charity, it needs only to be unlocked.

Yes, and Jake Wood defended Harry being given the award.

Decent?

Of course ALL the accomplishments of the members of the BRF are the result of the work of the palace and government (lets not forget that Invictus involves the governments of the participant states). The other members of the BRF had the good taste to not take it as being a personal...

I’ll always be very skeptical are there any other claimants who are accused of erasing evidence? On the subject of Invictus, “Harry's vision, passion and enthusiasm” would have been a big fat zero without the palace machine, as proven by his zero accomplishments since “fleeting for freedom”.

It doesn’t affect the time line that Harry has to respect. As it’s a civil lawsuit, it’s not about what NGN did or did not, it’s about compensation demanded by the claimants. If it’s proven that Harry was aware at a date before the one he pretends it is, his case is null.

The comments on the espn account on X for the award are gold.

Whoaaa… He really is the husband of his wife.

The heir inherits certain fixed valuables and is extempted from paying taxes on those and anything else he/she inherits. All others who receive anything have to pay inheritance tax. The monarch can very well leave something to whomever she/he wants, the recipient has to pay taxes if it’s not the...