Search results

Is that so? Then please tell me why the DNA tests are not valid, why the intestines were not AA's, why the hair was not AA's, and why the bone fragments found in Russia last year are not the last two missing children. Until you can do all of this, none of your old quotes from decades ago are...

I am well aware of Bear's theories, this is why I posted what I did. Bear does not want the truth, she wants a different answer.

Nice try Chat, but it really doesn't hold up, especially not coming from you. Don't even get me started on all the people you've called liars or accused of denying AA for some imagined ulterior motives. (Olga, Gilliard, Ernie, Dmitri Leuchtenberg, Bux, etc. etc., along with everyone involved in...

Being a a bog for 90 years would have a hand in disentigrating and dissolving much of what was left, don't you think? It is not my 'opinion' that DNA proved AA was not AN, and that all five children have been found. This is proven fact. Bear, you've been saying this for years now, but the...

Ummm...isn't that what I've been trying to tell you for several posts? As I have stated, the sample was found under the name Anastasia Manahan. Nothing was found for "Anna Anderson" or "Mrs. Jack Manahan." Apparently you and Bear have issues with that, I don't. It has to be the right name...

I did. That's why I quoted them. It's just like I said, it only came up under the right name, as any other search. What are you alleging, wrongdoing by the hospital? Lying? Hiding? You know, sometimes you seem to blame the hospital, other times the labs, or the mailman, other times, some...

List of legal cases decided by mtDNA testing like AA's. Legal precedence proving the DNA test on AA WOULD hold up in court! Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Cases State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 515 S.E.2d 508 (S.C., Apr 05, 1999) (NO. 2493 2) council.PDF People v. Klinger, 713 N.Y.S.2d 823, 2000...

As I explained, that's not her name, it was under Anastasia Manahan. Jack Manahan was a nickname and not a real person and he was not the patient, and they do not automatically give you everyone else of the same last name in a search, it would be giving out someone else's info. Even myspace...

That's not right, Chat. They looked under "Anna Anderson", and then "Mrs. Jack Manahan." They didn't find anything until they used the name "Anastasia Manahan", which is what the records were listed under all along. Jack was her husband's nickname, his real name was John, and he was not the...

No Bear, it's not what I think, it's reality. It goes for all cases. Three were in the mass grave, one in the burn pit. That's enough for all the scientists and officials involved. No one ever asked for four separate DNA profiles to be done except for you and a few others on this board. The...

Exactly. Never mind all that. That's what I was explaining. Those men freed by DNA testing had all been convicted by "all that testimony in court" and all that stuff that people who were there said, even those who swore he was the personwho did the crime based on looks, voice, etc. When the DNA...

As I have been trying to explain to you for a long time, all evidence is not of equal weight! Sorry but your commentary and he said/she saids from decades ago are NOT of the same status as DNA testing. Even today, as I've frequently mentioned, people who were imprisoned by a judge and jury due...

Again, here are the explainations and reasons for why the DNA tests in the AA case are NOT wrong, including a personal response from Dr. Terry Melton, who did some of the tests: Here's another issue- to those who think there's something dishonest about Prince Phillip's blood being used to test...

Chat like I said you have either lost your memory or are trying to annoy me. I have given you load and loads of quotes, links, and other evidence. It will never be good enough for you. Nothing will ever convince you, you'll just say the person who said it is a liar. We'll never know for sure who...

Chat this has become ridiculous. You do not 'catch me at every turn' you keep saying the same old meaningless garbage over and over and I am not going to keep reposting all the same responses I've given you before, because everyone else here finds it tiring and circular. If you really want to...

I'm not quite sure I know what you are getting at. The 99.9% is that AA is FS, because DNA can never prove who you are, only who you are not- she was a 100% exclusion from being Anastasia, or related to the royal family. That is certain.

And how did I know you were going to say the same thing, and always use Olga and Gilliard even though they denied her, how tiring. We've been through this dozens of times! Andrew did not know her enough to be a judge of her and accepted AA before he ever met her. Lili was elderly and tricked by...

Never heard anyone but you say it. Well maybe AGR Bear. All? really? I don't see anyone who had a personal relationship with her accept her except your Botkins who, well, you know what I think. Well there you go, that's not exactly widespread, and most people would never see them. Mugshot...

Only YOU say they were retouched. What about all the emigres', they were not the 'general public.' Again you play both sides, you say people wouldn't know her, then say they did when it suits you if someone accepts AA? You always say that 'far corners' story yet what do you mean? A couple of...

Chat if you've got some money to blow here's a good purchase opportunity for you, right up your alley: Elvis is Alive Museum is apparently set to die - Yahoo! News

Which ones were these? Exactly how were they spread to the public? Most of all, if they were AA, and AA looked like AN (which she didn't of course) why didn't anyone say HEY LOOK IT's ANASTASIA? Half a million Russian emigres' in Germany you know! So yes that's very self defeating for you. What...

I am glad that it's finally been proven Lenin ordered the murders. It's been denied for too long and now we have the truth. It is good the Russians admitted what happened and made the family victims. The children were especially innocent.

You contradict yourself here. You say why didn't anyone recognize the picture, then you say nobody could recognize anyone from that picture! Also note that no one saw the picture and said "HEY THERE'S ANASTASIA!" and she was a lot more famous than FS. So you really do shoot yourself in the foot...

Yes you sure do stick to what you know, the same old worn out rhetoric, lists, and quotes from decades ago, again and again. You never add or accept anything new, like that the DNA has proven AA to be a fraud and none of the rest matters anymore.

Chat, I posted my reasoning under the heading of it being IDEAS - observations and logical deduction on what must have happened, since AA WAS NOT AN! As I've said many times before, you'll never have 'proof' of who told her what and when, because no one goes around leaving paper trails of fraud...