The Future of the Norwegian Monarchy


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
See posts with no answers
(..)

When looking back the relatively short history of the NRF, they never have a "proper spare". Olav was the only child of their first king, Harald has two siblings with no succession right, similar to his father Haakon is the only one on the line of succession until 90s. Their royal house is always small. It's risky but I guess they have just got used to it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Posts that did discuss members of the British Royal Family only have been removed as off-topic. Also please try to stay on topic without wide digressions concerning similar cases in other royal houses. This is about the future of the Norwegian Monarchy only. Thank you!
 
A new opinion poll shows that the monarchy still has solid support among the Norwegian people. But only 62% of young people want the monarchy.

In a recent opinion poll conducted by Norstat for NRK, 73 percent say they support the monarchy.

Despite the fact that the monarchy is still strong in Norway, there has, however, been a decline in support in recent years.

www.nrk.no

Langt færre unge støtter monarkiet

En ny meningsmåling viser at monarkiet fortsatt har solid oppslutning i det norske folk. Men kun 62 prosent av unge voksne vil ha kongedømme.
www.nrk.no www.nrk.no
 
I think that 62% for young people is actually quite a high number. And as they age the support among these people will probably increase as people tend to get more conservative as they age.
 
A very sensible and informative article.
It requires a change of the Constitution and it is possible to carry out that change pretty fast (due to an upcoming general election.) The article doesn't say whether there has to be a referendum in order to make this adjustment to the Constitution. Anyone in the know?
The article, quite rightly, points to the problem of there being so few primary royals in Norway. Right now the NRF are down to one full time working royal and four part time royals. Which IMO is pretty thin.
If Haakon go down for a few months with something, say a poor back, and with King Harald ill a lot these days, Norway has basically become a regency, because Ingrid is not allowed to step in.
And that may raise a genuine debate in Norway: Is there any need for a monarchy?
IMO a monarchy has to stay relevant and in order to stay alive. The primary function of any monarchy being ruling the monarchy and that means someone formally being in charge.

It is also eroding for the NRF if a regency (i.e. the government) takes over each time Haakon is abroad in some capacity (which is also a primary function of any monarchy) because the King is ill.
So the sooner Ingrid can take over, the more experience she will get - and she may need that experience a lot sooner than her contemporaries.
 
Last edited:
:previous: You've made very thoughtful arguments. For the other side, two years ago Prince Albert II of Monaco altered his house laws on regency to adopt a system which was fundamentally the same as the Norwegian one. Previously, all individuals in line to take throne in Monaco, as well as the spouse or widow/widower of the monarch, were in line for regency also, but following Albert II's reform, if the Crown Prince is under age or incapacitated, the Monegasque regency will be conducted by a council of officials. The Prince must have considered there to be some advantages to the Norwegian system.
 
Muhler said:
A very sensible and informative article.
It requires a change of the Constitution and it is possible to carry out that change pretty fast (due to an upcoming general election.) The article doesn't say whether there has to be a referendum in order to make this adjustment to the Constitution. Anyone in the know?
The article, quite rightly, points to the problem of there being so few primary royals in Norway. Right now the NRF are down to one full time working royal and four part time royals. Which IMO is pretty thin.
If Haakon go down for a few months with something, say a poor back, and with King Harald ill a lot these days, Norway has basically become a regency, because Ingrid is not allowed to step in.
And that may raise a genuine debate in Norway: Is there any need for a monarchy?
IMO a monarchy has to stay relevant and in order to stay alive. The primary function of any monarchy being ruling the monarchy and that means someone formally being in charge.

It is also eroding for the NRF if a regency (i.e. the government) takes over each time Haakon is abroad in some capacity (which is also a primary function of any monarchy) because the King is ill.
So the sooner Ingrid can take over, the more experience she will get - and she may need that experience a lot sooner than her contemporaries.
Click to expand...
Your point about the scarcity of full-time royals makes me wonder if they might want to consider a larger role for Sverre Magnus.
 
Blog Real said:
In a recent opinion poll conducted by Norstat for NRK, 73 percent say they support the monarchy.

Despite the fact that the monarchy is still strong in Norway, there has, however, been a decline in support in recent years.

www.nrk.no

Langt færre unge støtter monarkiet

En ny meningsmåling viser at monarkiet fortsatt har solid oppslutning i det norske folk. Men kun 62 prosent av unge voksne vil ha kongedømme.
www.nrk.no www.nrk.no
Click to expand...
The NRK poll used to be at around 70% but rose to over 80% in 2014 and 2017.
It was at 78% in 2022 and at 73% in February 2024. And not weird that it has gone down a bit after all the drama with Märtha and Durek.

Another poll, which was conducted by InFact for Nettavisen in March 2024, showed the support at 75% (article).

So the Norwegian monarchy still has the highest support in Europe. (The latest poll in Denmark shows the support for the Danish monarchy at 70%.)

--------------------

Marengo said:
I think that 62% for young people is actually quite a high number. And as they age the support among these people will probably increase as people tend to get more conservative as they age.
Click to expand...
Yes, 62% support among the 18-29 age group is quite high, but it was at 82% in 2017, but that was before all the Märtha and Durek stuff.

--------------------

polyesco said:
Not sure if this is the right thread, but interesting article about Ingrid Alexandra being allowed to be regent.
www.aftenposten.no

Loven bør endres: La Ingrid Alexandra regjere

Det vil trolig bli flere tilfeller fremover der Norge er uten regent.
www.aftenposten.no www.aftenposten.no
Click to expand...
Yes, an interesting article by the serious and reliable royal historian Trond Norén Isaksen. But that being said, it's never going to happen!

Because I cannot see any of the political parties in the Storting prioritizing this.

--------------------

Muhler said:
The article doesn't say whether there has to be a referendum in order to make this adjustment to the Constitution. Anyone in the know?
Click to expand...
No, there doesn't need to be a referendum.

--------------------

kalnel said:
Your point about the scarcity of full-time royals makes me wonder if they might want to consider a larger role for Sverre Magnus.
Click to expand...
CP Haakon has been quite clear that this is not the plan.
 
Tatiana Maria said:
:previous: You've made very thoughtful arguments. For the other side, two years ago Prince Albert II of Monaco altered his house laws on regency to adopt a system which was fundamentally the same as the Norwegian one. Previously, all individuals in line to take throne in Monaco, as well as the spouse or widow/widower of the monarch, were in line for regency also, but following Albert II's reform, if the Crown Prince is under age or incapacitated, the Monegasque regency will be conducted by a council of officials. The Prince must have considered there to be some advantages to the Norwegian system.
Click to expand...
The Norwegian system seems to be the best solution in matters of regency and relatives. Better a team council than a specific, or questionable, royal to protect the institution.
 
Toledo said:
The Norwegian system seems to be the best solution in matters of regency and relatives. Better a team council than a specific, or questionable, royal to protect the institution.
Click to expand...

so should the heir be regent at all? or just have a team council deal with cabinet meetings?
 
In cases such as Norway, where the king stays on even when he has to significantly reduce his activities due to ill health, to me it would make sense to allow others in the direct line of succession (so not only the heir but also the heir to the heir) to step in as temporary regent.
 
Nettavisen's royal expert Tove Taalesen at her debate article
Is that enough now, King Harald?
Once again, it is private affairs that steal the attention from the royal family's activities.
Crown Prince Haakon represents alone at the Olympics in Paris, while the Crown Princess handles her son Marius Borg Høiby, who has been taken by the police for violence and damage.
Is this the new normal for the Norwegian royal family, with scandals, private affairs and trouble with the police?
This is new for us Norwegians.
We are used to a royal house that is politically correct, conforms and lives in harmony with the people. And which focuses on everyday matters that concern most people.
Now it resembles a reality show more than a respected cultural institution.
If this is the new normal, I think the monarchy is in danger.
www.nettavisen.no

Er det nok nå, kong Harald?

Om dette er den nye normalen tror jeg monarkiet står i fare.
www.nettavisen.no www.nettavisen.no



​

 
I think Norway would be well served by adopting the swedish system here, with the highest ranking available adult in the line of succession serving as a temporary guardian of the realm until The King / The Crown Prince Regent is available again… Currently number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the line of succession is above the age of 18 and so that wouldn’t be much of a problem….

As things stands, that ofcourse includes the risk of Princess Märtha Louise sometime becoming in charge for a breef period. But considering how often she is in USA, or anywhere else in the world with her Shaman, it is still not likely…

In Sweden, the Monarch has almost no political role to fill since 1975 so the vice-regent capacity is more a symbolic act of who is in charge, and who when needed takes over The King’s meetings and audiences, and who the government should keep informed…. But the symbolic act of the highest ranking adult in the line of succession being in charge when the Monarch is absent (and the Speaker of the Parliament only when no adult in the line of succession is available) serves small royal families well i think…
 
Hans-Rickard said:
I think Norway would be well served by adopting the swedish system here, with the highest ranking available adult in the line of succession serving as a temporary guardian of the realm until The King / The Crown Prince Regent is available again… Currently number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the line of succession is above the age of 18 and so that wouldn’t be much of a problem….

As things stands, that ofcourse includes the risk of Princess Märtha Louise sometime becoming in charge for a breef period. But considering how often she is in USA, or anywhere else in the world with her Shaman, it is still not likely…

In Sweden, the Monarch has almost no political role to fill since 1975 so the vice-regent capacity is more a symbolic act of who is in charge, and who when needed takes over The King’s meetings and audiences, and who the government should keep informed…. But the symbolic act of the highest ranking adult in the line of succession being in charge when the Monarch is absent (and the Speaker of the Parliament only when no adult in the line of succession is available) serves small royal families well i think…
Click to expand...
Which Royal Family are you talking about?
 
1. Haakon
2. Ingrid Alexandra
3. Sverre Magnus
4. Martha Louise
5. Maud Angelica
6. Leah Isadora

So, in fact, they are all adult.
Hans-Rickard said:
The Norwegian Royal Family
Click to expand...
I hope consequences of Marius' deeds will not omit him.
And his step-aunt is in fact brainwashed.

I really fear that the future King may go into history as Haakon VIII and the last one.
 
LadyFinn said:
Nettavisen's royal expert Tove Taalesen at her debate article
Is that enough now, King Harald?
Once again, it is private affairs that steal the attention from the royal family's activities.
Crown Prince Haakon represents alone at the Olympics in Paris, while the Crown Princess handles her son Marius Borg Høiby, who has been taken by the police for violence and damage.
Is this the new normal for the Norwegian royal family, with scandals, private affairs and trouble with the police?
This is new for us Norwegians.
We are used to a royal house that is politically correct, conforms and lives in harmony with the people. And which focuses on everyday matters that concern most people.
Now it resembles a reality show more than a respected cultural institution.
If this is the new normal, I think the monarchy is in danger.
www.nettavisen.no

Er det nok nå, kong Harald?

Om dette er den nye normalen tror jeg monarkiet står i fare.
www.nettavisen.no www.nettavisen.no



​

Click to expand...
To be expected. And there will be more opinion pieces like this. All of them will say that the monarchy is in danger. Which it potentially is. But unless Ingrid or Magnus for that matter pulls a similar stunt, the NRF will survive.
But the credit of King Harald and CP Haakon may be severely reduced if they handle this in the wrong way.

Most royal families can handle and easily survive one circus clown within the family, but two (or rather three) is where it gets a bit too much.
 
Muhler said:
To be expected. And there will be more opinion pieces like this. All of them will say that the monarchy is in danger. Which it potentially is. But unless Ingrid or Magnus for that matter pulls a similar stunt, the NRF will survive.
But the credit of King Harald and CP Haakon may be severely reduced if they handle this in the wrong way.

Most royal families can handle and easily survive one circus clown within the family, but two (or rather three) is where it gets a bit too much.
Click to expand...
Yes that’s the main danger for them as of now… When the tragic clowns in the family becomes more in number than those who works full time…

The media will only report things that sells, and if they can choose between Queen Sonja inagurating a cultural place, Crown Prince Haakon being on a business trip, Crown Princess Mette Marit hosting the litterature train - or the angel teacher Märtha Louise marrying a quack quack shaman or Marius getting taken by the police for sending a woman to hospital and destroying an apartment…. It is pretty obvious to me wich news would sell most and quickest
 
Last edited:
Muhler said:
To be expected. And there will be more opinion pieces like this. All of them will say that the monarchy is in danger. Which it potentially is. But unless Ingrid or Magnus for that matter pulls a similar stunt, the NRF will survive.
But the credit of King Harald and CP Haakon may be severely reduced if they handle this in the wrong way.

Most royal families can handle and easily survive one circus clown within the family, but two (or rather three) is where it gets a bit too much.
Click to expand...
I think ML may be a more critical issue for the NRF than Marius actually since, unlike Marius, she is still 4th in line to the throne.
 
Tatiana Maria said:
Marius is also a member of the Royal Family, both officially and in the eyes of the public.

www.royalcourt.no

The Royal House of Norway

Presentation of the Royal House of Norway and other members of The Royal Family.
www.royalcourt.no
Click to expand...
In my view not. He is no descedant of the Royal at all. But strange. In one country not even the sisters of the present and daughters of the former King are considered members of the Royal Family and in the other one who is no related to the royals at all (only that he is the half brother of the future Queen) is included.
 
I don't think it is in danger, as the trouble makers are irrelevant in the grand scheme.
 
Stefan said:
In my view not. He is no descedant of the Royal at all. But strange. In one country not even the sisters of the present and daughters of the former King are considered members of the Royal Family and in the other one who is no related to the royals at all (only that he is the half brother of the future Queen) is included.
Click to expand...

Well, membership of the Norwegian Royal Family is decided by the King of Norway, and not by us or by foreign monarchs.

Given that Marius Borg Høiby lived primarily with the Crown Prince and Crown Princess since early childhood, I think the King made the pragmatic and correct decision. Besides, the King also granted Erling Lorentzen, Johan Martin Ferner, Ari Behn, and soon Durek Verrett membership of the Royal Family, so it could have seemed rather inconsistent not to include Marius.

www.royalcourt.no

The Royal House of Norway

Presentation of the Royal House of Norway and other members of The Royal Family.
www.royalcourt.no


The Royal Family

The Royal House of Norway belongs to the House of Glücksburg. The members of the Norwegian Royal House are Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja and Their Royal Highnesses Crown Prince Haakon, Crown Princess Mette-Marit and Princess Ingrid Alexandra.

The members of the Royal Family are in addition the Crown Prince and Crown Princess’s other children, His Highness Prince Sverre Magnus and Mr Marius Borg Høiby; Her Highness Princess Märtha Louise, Miss Maud Angelica Behn, Miss Leah Isadora Behn, Miss Emma Tallulah Behn and Her Highness Princess Astrid, Mrs Ferner.
​
 
Fürstin Taxis said:
I don't think it is in danger, as the trouble makers are irrelevant in the grand scheme.
Click to expand...
I agree, but the question will be asked what sort of upbringing is resulting in this total lack of judgement and even criminal behavior. The danger, in my opinion, is the individuals may not be relevant, but their actions reflect poorly, will erode trust, and won’t inspire confidence in the grand scheme.
 
Tatiana Maria said:
Well, membership of the Norwegian Royal Family is decided by the King of Norway, and not by us or by foreign monarchs.

Given that Marius Borg Høiby lived primarily with the Crown Prince and Crown Princess since early childhood, I think the King made the pragmatic and correct decision. Besides, the King also granted Erling Lorentzen, Johan Martin Ferner, Ari Behn, and soon Durek Verrett membership of the Royal Family, so it could have seemed rather inconsistent not to include Marius.

www.royalcourt.no

The Royal House of Norway

Presentation of the Royal House of Norway and other members of The Royal Family.
www.royalcourt.no

​
The Royal Family​
​
The Royal House of Norway belongs to the House of Glücksburg. The members of the Norwegian Royal House are Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja and Their Royal Highnesses Crown Prince Haakon, Crown Princess Mette-Marit and Princess Ingrid Alexandra.​
​
The members of the Royal Family are in addition the Crown Prince and Crown Princess’s other children, His Highness Prince Sverre Magnus and Mr Marius Borg Høiby; Her Highness Princess Märtha Louise, Miss Maud Angelica Behn, Miss Leah Isadora Behn, Miss Emma Tallulah Behn and Her Highness Princess Astrid, Mrs Ferner.​
Click to expand...
But then Erling Lorentzen, Johan Martin Ferner and Ari Behn are married to royals and their children are blood-related to the royal Family which is not the case for Marius. I think better would habe been to say he is a Part of the Crown Prince's Family.
 
It makes no sense whatsoever for Marius to be considered a member of the royal family, and Martha's children are not.
As for the future of the monarchy, with all these scandals it is obviously threatened.
What needs to be analyzed is what type of education led Marius to have this type of attitude. Either way, I don't see Princess Ingrid Alexandra having that kind of attitude, and I don't think Sverre Magnus does either. But there has to be a deep reflection on what happened, that has to be...
The Royal Family of Norway has to look at the other royal families and realize that there are certain things that have to change...
 
Blog Real said:
It makes no sense whatsoever for Marius to be considered a member of the royal family, and Martha's children are not.
Click to expand...

Like Marius Borg Høiby, Princess Märtha Louise's daughters are members of the Royal Family. Princess Ragnhild's and Princess Astrid's children are not (although their late fathers were).

www.royalcourt.no

The Royal House of Norway

Presentation of the Royal House of Norway and other members of The Royal Family.
www.royalcourt.no


The Royal Family

The Royal House of Norway belongs to the House of Glücksburg. The members of the Norwegian Royal House are Their Majesties King Harald and Queen Sonja and Their Royal Highnesses Crown Prince Haakon, Crown Princess Mette-Marit and Princess Ingrid Alexandra.

The members of the Royal Family are in addition the Crown Prince and Crown Princess’s other children, His Highness Prince Sverre Magnus and Mr Marius Borg Høiby; Her Highness Princess Märtha Louise, Miss Maud Angelica Behn, Miss Leah Isadora Behn, Miss Emma Tallulah Behn and Her Highness Princess Astrid, Mrs Ferner.
​

Perhaps we should move the discussion about membership of the Royal Family to Constitutional and Dynastic Matters in the Norwegian Monarchy.
 
Chimene said:
I agree, but the question will be asked what sort of upbringing is resulting in this total lack of judgement and even criminal behavior. The danger, in my opinion, is the individuals may not be relevant, but their actions reflect poorly, will erode trust, and won’t inspire confidence in the grand scheme.
Click to expand...
If not for anything else, it’s a sign that no parental love, no stable upbringing, and no priviligies in the world gives a 100 % protection from ending up on the wrong side of the law….

People are just not used to see the Norwegian RF having members who does not behave within the law.

And for the NRF, adding this to their ”other” currently ongoing scandal won’t do them any good with the norwegian people… When they only have 1 member working full time, and 4 members working part-time, people will only see and hear about the scandals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

iceflower
Opening of Parliament (Folketinget) 2024 -
Replies
4
Views
711
Blog Real
Blog Real
iceflower
Gender, names & godparents for Princess Beatrice & Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi's second child
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
Gawin
G
iceflower
General Questions and Information about Danish Titles
Replies
11
Views
2K
blooms_rulers
B
iceflower
Prince Albert II of Monaco Current Events Part 35: September 2024 -
Replies
26
Views
3K
iceflower
iceflower
iceflower
Princess Charlene's Fashion and Style Part 20: September 2024 -
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Elly C
Elly C

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom