Royal Wedding Gifts


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.

Ennyllorac

Royal Highness
Joined
Dec 7, 2003
Messages
1,975
Country
United States
There are many newlyweds this 2004-- Mary and Frederick, Letizia and Felipe, Mabel and Johan, Noor and Hamzah, Ali and Rym, Davina Windsor and Gary Lewis. What kind of presents would you give to Royal newlyweds?
 
Last edited:
For Felipe and Letizia matching Western wear so they can have lunch at the Bush Ranch.

028525.jpg
 
Let's see...if all of the couples have small "personal" Christmas trees (wonder if they do?) then a very special ornament for their first Christmas together would be nice!
 
From Corbis...

1.Children make a giant puzzle depicting an image of Spain's Crown Prince Felipe and fiancee Letizia Ortiz at a comercial mall in the Asturian capital Oviedo April 16, 2004. The puzzle, measuring 3x2.4 metres, will be sent as a wedding present when the couple marry next May 22 in Madrid.

2.Silverware including vanity mirrors and a writing set offered as wedding presents to the Royal couple.

3.Choice of wedding presents suggested by Duran Joyeros to offer the Royal couple on display
 

Attachments

  • DWF15-677386.jpg
    DWF15-677386.jpg
    60.9 KB · Views: 1,394
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 404
  • DWF15-676763.jpg
    DWF15-676763.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 449
From Getty...

Silversmith Marcelo Toledo shows a case with flower-shaped salt shakers made out of sterling silver 07 May, 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The group, composed of six different kind of flowers (daisy-pansy-hydrangea-pomegranate-orange blossom-glacier) will be the Argentine government's official wedding present in the wedding of Spanish Prince Felipe de Borbon with Letizia Ortiz next May 22nd in Madrid.
 

Attachments

  • 50812111.jpg
    50812111.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 417
  • 50812114.jpg
    50812114.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 455
From Getty...

Maxima Zorreguieta (L), Argentine fiancee of Dutch Crown Prince Willem Alexander (R) holds a golden crown that she received as wedding present from the Dutch Gold and Silversmith Society January 9, 2002 in The Hague, The Netherlands. The couple will marry in Amsterdam February 2, 2002.
 

Attachments

  • 691966.jpg
    691966.jpg
    26 KB · Views: 558
From Getty...

1.An attendant is standing in front of a smaller part of the thousands of wedding gifts on public display at Chistiansborg Castle in central Copenhagen 17 May 2004. The gifts are from the recent Royal wedding of Denmarks Crown Prince Frederik and Crownprince Mary

2.Two mountainbikes one of them equipped with a baby-seat are amoung the thousands of weddinggifts on public display at Chistiansborg Castle in central Copenhagen Thursday, May 17. 2004. The gifts are from the recent Royal wedding of Denmarks Crown Prince Frederik and Crownprince Mary.

3. A specialy decorated, two-person, Christiania bicycle and paintings are among the thousands of wedding gifts for Denmark Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary are on public display at Chistiansborg Castle in central Copenhagen 17 June 2004.
 

Attachments

  • 50970074.jpg
    50970074.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 589
  • 50970079.jpg
    50970079.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 468
  • 50970065.jpg
    50970065.jpg
    61.1 KB · Views: 518
what about British Royals?

Prince Charles and late Diana,Princess of Wales? and Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall?

and Earl and Countess of Wessex? and Princess Anne? and Prince Andrew and Sarah,Duchess of York?

Sara Boyce
 
i heard that Charles have ppl burn wedding gifts at highgrove........cos he got too many of them (the 1st wedding)
 
What other wedding gifts did royal couples get?

I remember that Martha Louise and Ari Behn were criticized for asking for some very expensive things, but I don't remember what they were?

I wonder what Charles and Camilla got when they got married in April?

Also, what were the gifts for the current Kings and Queens like on their wedding days? I wonder if they were more extravagant than the ones the Crown Princes and Crown Princesses receive nowadays.
 
sara1981 said:
what about British Royals?

Prince Charles and late Diana,Princess of Wales?
I know that President and Mrs. Reagan gave them a giant crystal bowl, and a Middle Eastern (Saudi, I'm pretty sure) royal family gave Diana a sapphire parure of earrings and a necklace that matched her wedding ring. Diana's pearl drop tiara was the Queen's wedding gift.
 
I was just being cheesy and decided to watch Princess Diaries 2:p . It was during the wedding part when my brain started spinning. And I was wondering Do royal couples actually register at different store for wedding gifts? And then I started thinking they don't need the normal blender and toaster gifts that are normally given. So what do you give a royal couple for their wedding?:confused:
 
Some do. For example, Edward and Sophie did, and at the time many considered their list quite vulgar because they were asking for some pretty expensive things.For instance, they wanted a silver tea service at £33,000, an Asprey & Garrad teapot for £8,800 or 24 crystal glasses at £1,000 or a 26- piece china coffee and tea service. IIRC, the cheapest thing on the list was a £ 500 tea thingy (you know, the thing you put loose tea in and place in your cup).

It was quite a contrast to Phillipe and Mathilde who married only a few months later & who asked for donations to be made to a charity they had set-up in lieu of gifts.

These days, at least in my social circle, it is considered tacky to ask for gifts or to even register for them. That people take the time to come to your wedding and be a part of your special day is considered enough, & invitations stipulate "no gifts". Some people will present the couple with a card with a cheque in it, as this is deemed more useful to a newly married couple.
 
Yes, they do register, but not all together in the same respect as us normal ladies would.

Really? In America, we still register for gifts at stores and brides traditionally receive the majority of them at their wedding showers. We do not think it is considered tacky. This tradition for women has been going on for many, many, years and is quite useful to the new bride and groom.

While we WOULD NEVER outright ask anyone for gifts or money, there is nothing wrong from an etiquette standpoint of letting your invitees to your shower know where you are registered.

All etiquette books I have read mention nothing about it being tacky, at least in the United States, but then we do lead the way.
 
:) :) :) :D

Lady Marmalade said:
All etiquette books I have read mention nothing about it being tacky, at least in the United States, but then we do lead the way.
 
I am engaged and believe me....leading my my future husband through the stores registering was not the most enjoyable task.. :)

That is why all brides lead the way...
 
In Italy registering for gifts is becoming more and more popular and it's quite a recent tradition: when my parents got married 27 years ago it didn't exist yet.
 
Lady Marmalade said:
Yes, they do register, but not all together in the same respect as us normal ladies would.

Really? In America, we still register for gifts at stores and brides traditionally receive the majority of them at their wedding showers. We do not think it is considered tacky. This tradition for women has been going on for many, many, years and is quite useful to the new bride and groom.

While we WOULD NEVER outright ask anyone for gifts or money, there is nothing wrong from an etiquette standpoint of letting your invitees to your shower know where you are registered.

All etiquette books I have read mention nothing about it being tacky, at least in the United States, but then we do lead the way.

As I said, at least in my social circle it has become passse, and this year alone I've attended at least 30 weddings of friends and acquitences! All were adamant that there be no gifts. Ones presence was deemed enough.

These days many are marrying at a later age & many are already are well established & thus have no want or desire for more things, IME. Besides a lot of people don't follow the registry (which often contain outrageously expensive items) and end-up buying junk. Better to receive nothing than something you really don't want, as it is so wasteful.
 
Sean.~ said:
As I said, at least in my social circle it has become passse, and this year alone I've attended at least 30 weddings of friends and acquitences! All were adamant that there be no gifts. Ones presence was deemed enough.

These days many are marrying at a later age & many are already are well established & thus have no want or desire for more things, IME. Besides a lot of people don't follow the registry (which often contain outrageously expensive items) and end-up buying junk. Better to receive nothing than something you really don't want, as it is so wasteful.

Passé.....interesting word to use...I also have attended weddings, society and otherwise and it is still the height of chic to bring gifts out of the goodness of one's heart, tastefully chosen, wrapped and presented.



A matter of cultural differences in different countries, I suppose. In the United States, a first marriage, no matter what age, is usually precipitated by a shower with gifts from registries and is deemed okay to do by etiquette books from the likes of Miss Manners, Emily Post, and Amy Vanderbilt.



If the wedding is a second or third, I think it is not proper to be expected to have a shower, receive gifts from registries, or even, heaven forbid, request a monetary contribution. That is usually the case for marrying later. Here, men and women still get married at the late twenties to early thirties stage in life.
 
Different people, different tastes.
Most people that I know are marrying later in life and therefore are already established and have no need for things. Most of the weddings that I attend where older people are marrying, there is a request for no gifts. They would prefer a charitable donation. If the couple is still young(right out of college or university) then a registry exists.
As I myself am in my midthirties, I will request no gifts should I marry. I would prefer a charitable donation.
 
Different tastes for all. As long as the bride and groom are happy and in love, that is what counts the most.
 
I had feeling royal couples didn't follow that american tradition anymore. Which is probably because america doesn't have royals. But that was interesting to see what they did register for when they did. Thanks for all your input everyone.:)
 
Lady Marmalade said:
Passé.....interesting word to use...I also have attended weddings, society and otherwise and it is still the height of chic to bring gifts out of the goodness of one's heart, tastefully chosen, wrapped and presented.



A matter of cultural differences in different countries, I suppose. In the United States, a first marriage, no matter what age, is usually precipitated by a shower with gifts from registries and is deemed okay to do by etiquette books from the likes of Miss Manners, Emily Post, and Amy Vanderbilt.



If the wedding is a second or third, I think it is not proper to be expected to have a shower, receive gifts from registries, or even, heaven forbid, request a monetary contribution. That is usually the case for marrying later. Here, men and women still get married at the late twenties to early thirties stage in life.

According to Emily Post (not sure about Amy Vanderbilt or Miss Manners) 2nd or 3rd marriages can register and expect presents and showers. My husband and I are in the mid to late thirties complete with established careers. When we got married - his first, my second, we didn't think we would need to register because we had everything already. I had my own house, appliances, china, crystal, silver, etc., my husband had his own condominium, appliances, china and crystal and silver (yes ladies - it shocked me too but his mom decided he had to have these things) and everything he needed so when we got married, we had practically 2 of everything. I didn't bother having showers or a shower and told most of our friends and family that we would prefer no gifts (we didn't need any) that just their presence would be great. That's the other thing, since most of our families were coming in from out of town and out of country (all told only 6 people locally), we didn't want them to be spending more money than they were already going to be spending.

I got rid of the house since the condo is smaller and I like the location better :) We didn't want to register since we had literally everything. But we still ended up registering (at my mother-in-law's insistence - we had 3 - high end items, mid and low end items in 3 different stores) and a lot of people used that for a guideline instead of buying from the registry itself. Actually, I made sure that substitutions were allowed so people knew that they didn't have to stick with what I had on there. From the registries combined, we got 5 items and 2 substitutions, the rest cash since most of our friends and relatives knew we had everything we needed already.

I don't think everything is as rigid today as it was say... 20 years ago or more. For weddings I always bring a gift and having a registry just gives me an opportunity to use it as a guideline if the items there are too expensive. And don't be shocked - I checked before I registered because I wanted flexibility - being registered in more than one place is very acceptable today :)
 
Last edited:
Hi Lisele,

And I am sure your had a very elegant affair. How kind and warmhearted of your family, his family, and your friends.

You handled it in a very tasteful manner. I wish you both congratulations and all the best on a long and healthy marriage.

Mine is in October, so I know what you went through. :)
 
I attended the wedding of one of my friends earlier this summer, and he and his new wife had registered in some stores, but both of them just moved out from home so they needed pretty much everything. I think that registering works, if you have a wide selection of prices, so that people can decide how much they want to spend, and if it doesn't feel like you have to choose something from the lists. I know my parents got 8 iron pans, and 12 large glass bowls for their wedding, most of which was exchanged... it must surely feel better to get something that the bride and groom will keep, rather than exchange?

But to get back to the royals, (as is the intended topic) I know that Mette-Marit and Haakon had a "wish list" for their wedding, where the foremost thing they wanted was a gift to the special charity they were founding, but they also mentioned that they needed some china and silverware for Skaugum, which they got. I don't know if they registered anywhere, though.

Around Märtha Louise and Ari's wedding, if you wanted to give a gift, you could call the palace and they would supply you with a list of the items the couple desired, as they were making a new home together. (Of course, later the list was deemed snobbish because some of the items on it were rather expensive, so they went back on it, and said that they'd be happy if people made a contribution to the charity foundation that was founded in Märtha Louise's name when she was young.)
 
=Lady Marmalade]Passé.....interesting word to use...I also have attended weddings, society and otherwise and it is still the height of chic to bring gifts out of the goodness of one's heart, tastefully chosen, wrapped and presented.
Why, do you have a problem with it? I couldn't think of a better word, and thought that it summed-up what I was trying to convey adequately. In any case, I guess it depends on social and cultural norms as well other factors, such as a couples financial position.

A matter of cultural differences in different countries, I suppose. In the United States, a first marriage, no matter what age, is usually precipitated by a shower with gifts from registries and is deemed okay to do by etiquette books from the likes of Miss Manners, Emily Post, and Amy Vanderbilt.



Well, in Canada we are more multicultural, and each culture has its own social norms. In some cases it is considered bad manners to bring a gift. I haven't been to any showers, but wedding gifts at actual weddings amongst my peers (of whatever cultural background) is rare. A person taking the time to attend means more than a gift. Different values, I guess.


Also, to a certain extent it has to do with economics as well. That is, people are well off enough to buy their own things according to their own tastes. Most people I know find registries tacky and a bit low-brow. The view is that if one wants something then one should get it for themselves & not assume that others have either the means or desire to get it for them. After all, you're inviting people because you want them to be a part of your big day, and (hopefully) not because you want them to furnish your house according to your tastes. (Thus I find some royal "wish lists" as extremely vulgar -- particularly Edward and Sophie's).


If the wedding is a second or third, I think it is not proper to be expected to have a shower, receive gifts from registries, or even, heaven forbid, request a monetary contribution. That is usually the case for marrying later. Here, men and women still get married at the late twenties to early thirties stage in life .

It is the same here, but that is considered late compared to a generation earlier. Most are already working and established by their thirties & independent enough to buy their own things. Indeed, most would prefer it than getting something that they don't like or having people not attend because registry items are above and beyond what people are willing or able to pay.
 
Last edited:
Oh no, not at all...its one of my grandmother's most used words and when I read it, I thought about her and how often she uses it.

Sean.~ said:
Why, do you have a problem with it? I couldn't think of a better word, and thought that it summed-up what I was trying to convey adequately. In any case, I guess it depends on social and cultural norms as well other factors, such as a couples financial position.




Well, in Canada we are more multicultural, and each culture has its own social norms. In some cases it is considered bad manners to bring a gift. I haven't been to any showers, but wedding gifts at actual weddings amongst my peers (of whatever cultural background) is rare. A person taking the time to attend means more than a gift. Different values, I guess.

I have been to more showers and seen some of the most well meaning, but useless, gifts. We are multicultural as well in the United States, hence the term melting pot and salad bowl. :)

However, women here of all geographic areas still register for their gifts and even the finest and most exclusive stores we here are known for worldwide.

What makes it easier here, is that even discount stores have registries, which allows ladies of a certain socioeconomic status to be able to receive useful and beautiful gifts as well.


Also, to a certain extent it has to do with economics as well. That is, people are well off enough to buy their own things according to their own tastes. Most people I know find registries tacky and a bit low-brow. The view is that if one wants something then one should get it for themselves & not assume that others have either the means or desire to get it for them. After all, you're inviting people because you want them to be a part of your big day, and (hopefully) not because you want them to furnish your house according to your tastes. (Thus I find some royal "wish lists" as extremely vulgar -- particularly Edward and Sophie's).

I agree about the royal "wish lists". I see no reason for those whatsoever.



It is the same here, but that is considered late compared to a generation earlier. Most are already working and established by their thirties & independent enough to buy their own things. Indeed, most would prefer it than getting something that they don't like or having people not attend because registry items are above and beyond what people are willing or able to pay.
 
Back
Top Bottom