norwegianne
Majesty
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
- Messages
- 6,040
- City
- Rogaland
- Country
- Norway
"Folket" by Tor Bomann-Larsen - doubts Olav was Haakon's son...
The newest debate in the Norwegian papers is the second book in a series about King Haakon and Queen Maud. The author has managed to find evidence that he thinks proves that Olav wasn't Haakon's son.
Kong Haakon var ikke Olavs far? - Innenriks - Dagbladet.no
Sår tvil om Haakon var kong Olavs far - VG Nett om Foreldre og barn
Slottet uvitende - VG Nett om Kongehuset
(And the picture that would support the author's claim: Bildet som ryster Norge - VG Nett om Kongehuset) Another historian interviewed was impressed, because the rumours going around had been that Queen Maud was not his mother, not that King Haakon wasn't his father.
King Harald's reaction to it:
"Any author is within his or her full right to represent their understand of history," says H. M. The King. "That also goes for Tor Bomann Larsen's biography about King Haakon and Queen Maud."
The King have no information that would indicate that King Olav wouldn't have been the son of King Haakon.
"Prince Carl was after a referendum in 1905 elected by the Storting to be Norway's king, as King Haakon VII, with his wife Maud as queen, and their son Olav as Crown Prince"
Should this case be true it means that history books will have to be rewritten.
The newest debate in the Norwegian papers is the second book in a series about King Haakon and Queen Maud. The author has managed to find evidence that he thinks proves that Olav wasn't Haakon's son.
Kong Haakon var ikke Olavs far? - Innenriks - Dagbladet.no
Sår tvil om Haakon var kong Olavs far - VG Nett om Foreldre og barn
Slottet uvitende - VG Nett om Kongehuset
(And the picture that would support the author's claim: Bildet som ryster Norge - VG Nett om Kongehuset) Another historian interviewed was impressed, because the rumours going around had been that Queen Maud was not his mother, not that King Haakon wasn't his father.
King Harald's reaction to it:
"Any author is within his or her full right to represent their understand of history," says H. M. The King. "That also goes for Tor Bomann Larsen's biography about King Haakon and Queen Maud."
The King have no information that would indicate that King Olav wouldn't have been the son of King Haakon.
"Prince Carl was after a referendum in 1905 elected by the Storting to be Norway's king, as King Haakon VII, with his wife Maud as queen, and their son Olav as Crown Prince"
Should this case be true it means that history books will have to be rewritten.
Last edited by a moderator: