RoyalReporter Richard Palmer
There will be press and TV cameras there when the Queen and Kate tour the exhibition on Friday afternoon.
Nice we'll get to see the Queen and Kate together tomorrow!
Kate's wedding dress goes on the display at the week-end,alongside with other items from her big day
Kate Middleton wedding gown we all fell in love with goes on display | Mail Online
The dress cost $400,000? Is that the first time the cost has been reported?
Highly unlikely number, IMO.
Pictures of the Duchess and Her Majesty viewing the exhibition.
Kate's wedding dress goes on display at Buckingham Palace
fascinator said:I read somewhere that the exhibit had been described as "ghostly" and,unfortunately, that seems to be an accurate description. Does anyone else think it's a bit too somber? I can see how they would want to capture how exquisite the gown is, but all of the joy and excitement of a wedding as been taken out.
Well, that won't stop me from seeing it. I can't wait!!
Perhaps the 400,000 figure has been aggregated to include replacement cost for the tiara and the cost of other jewelry worn on that day.
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but why is Williams uniform not at the exhibit??
fascinator said:Let's see ...
500,000 viewers at 17.50GBP each. That's GBP8.75 million/ $13.125 million. I would hope that there is a "lending fee" for the gown that compensates the Middletons based on the incremental increase in BP visitor volume. The purchase of the gown would be an investment with an ROI not seen since Whitewater!
I am sure the Middletons were thinking not at all about the ROI but instead about their lovely daughters happiness and joy on her wedding dress and day when buying her wedding dress......
fascinator said:Is that even necessary? Honestly!
It was just a cheeky observation about Kate and William Inc.'s profitability, not about the Middletons' intentions.
I doubt there is such a thing as a lending fee that is more than nominal.
Super Baroness said:Duchess of Cambridge's dress display is horrid, cries Queen - Telegraph
For some reason, I have a hard time believing The Queen would really say such things, especially in front of her granddaughter-in-law, the curator, and the press.
I actually really like the display, but I do wonder if there will be more light during the actual exhibit. The ensemble wouldn't look out of place at the Royal wedding dress display in April that had the gowns of Queen Victoria, Queen Alexandra, Princess Margaret, and Princess Alexandra of Kent - which also featured headless mannequins in darkly lit rooms.
Let's see ...
500,000 viewers at 17.50GBP each. That's GBP8.75 million/ $13.125 million. I would hope that there is a "lending fee" for the gown that compensates the Middletons based on the incremental increase in BP visitor volume. The purchase of the gown would be an investment with an ROI not seen since Whitewater!
...
It was just a cheeky observation about Kate and William Inc.'s profitability, not about the Middletons' intentions.
You made me laugh with this Kate and William Inc. and ROI remarks, Fascinator!
I also thought it was strange that they didn't display William's uniform together with the wedding gown, after all, I don't think he'll need to wear it this summer. Of course, given all the fuss made around Pippa's dress, I wasn't expecting it to be part of the exhibit, but nothing would have prevented them from also showing the bridesmades' and pages' outfits, they were all part of the show.