Weren't the succession laws altered by Rainier in 2002 specifically because Rainier knew about rumors of Albert's out of wedlock children(specifically Jazmin Rotolo) and wanted specifically to block them from the Succession?
The bold type is no longer true with the changes in 2002.The solution was an unequal treaty between France and Monaco which formalized and rendered permanent the latter's position as a client state: Not only did it require Monaco to conduct its foreign relations in consultation with or through France, but it obliged the dynasty to obtain French authorization for marital alliances or changes in succession, and declared that should the throne become vacant Monaco would become an official protectorate under French jurisdiction — while retaining nominal independence.
I was wondering: suppose Albert and Charlene have only daughters and no sons? Would a daughter be allowed to inherit the throne, or would it then go to Andrea Casiraghi?
I was wondering: suppose Albert and Charlene have only daughters and no sons? Would a daughter be allowed to inherit the throne, or would it then go to Andrea Casiraghi?
What I was looking for when I said union was Council of Europe I hope you read it to understand the reasons for the changes. Monaco applied for membership October 15, 1998.I think the 2002 change was because PA still did not have an heir. Rather than becoming part of France they changed it so that PC could become ruler then Andrea if PA remained heirless. The clever Monagasques have become more valuable to France as an independent country than becoming part of France. They are a major employer of the French and promote many French products such as haute couture and tourism.
3. The Assembly welcomes the major constitutional and legislative changes implemented by Monaco in response to the recommendations of the eminent lawyers and rapporteurs. These are primarily the constitutional amendments adopted on 28 March 2002, concerning in particular the enlarged powers of the National Council (the parliament) in respect of initiating laws, amending legislation, deciding on budgetary matters and ratification of certain international instruments, as well as matters relating to the acquisition of Monegasque nationality and the enjoyment of civil rights.
Wikipedia 2002 ChangesVII. Relations with France and the problem of sovereignty
They revised the Treaty with France and made other changes to the Constitution removing the adoption clause because there was no longer any need.Until 2002, the crown of Monaco could only pass to the direct descendants (including adopted children) of the reigning prince. This meant that Princess Antoinette was not in the line of succession and that Princesses Caroline and Stéphanie would lose their places in line at the moment of Prince Albert's succession. This created considerable concern that the throne might fall vacant should Prince Albert inherit the crown and then die without fathering (or adopting) a legitimate heir. In 2002, changes were made to the Constitution of Monaco which eliminated that concern.
Until 2002, the reigning Prince could adopt an heir who would succeed him if the Prince died without biological children. Prince Albert could thus have adopted one of his nephews, or even someone unrelated, and made the person his heir. That option no longer exists. Now, if Prince Albert II fails to marry and father a legitimate heir, the crown will automatically pass to one of his sisters or one of their children—also regardless of any illegitimate children he has fathered.
The fact that Alexandra is "dynaste", does this mean that she is monegasque (art 10, only a citizen can be the sovereign of Monaco) ? Is she german?
She probably has dual citizenship.
The current law still has boys first.
I've said this many times and so has others. The only way either of Albert's children can become his heir is he has to divorce Charlene and have the marriage annulled by the Catholic Church then Albert has to marry the mother of the child he decides to make his heir. If he had wanted to that happen he would have married Tamara or Nicole instead of Charlene.So his two children are not in line of succession because of they are illegitimate births. I understand that. But if they move to Monaco and become citizen? or does the Prince Albert have to legally "adopt them" even tho he has claimed they are his children?
Albert would need to abdicate before having a child with Charlene other wise the child is the heir. If he decided to change the Constitution again and that is a big if to pass over his legitimate heirs it could cause a legal battle down the line should his child or children fight for it.If Princess Charlene does bear an heir maybe Prince Albert will give the throne to one of Caro's kids?Unless his children sue like those of Picasso[his illegits got their share of the estate] they are unlikely to inherit but then again these times they are a changing
Yes, Alexandra is 5th in line.^isnt Princess Alexandra 5th? then Princess Stephanie 6#, Louis 7# and Pauline 8#.
when Princess Stephanie of Luxembourg was born, her mother was 40 and her father was 60!..i read somewhere that a man can produce children until their 70s, Albert is young compared to that age, so im expecting soon or later an official pregnancy annoucement^^
The line of succession in Monaco is pretty clear so there is no succession crisis or succession issue.
1 Caroline, Hereditary Princess of Monaco
2 Andrea Casiraghi
3 Pierre Casiraghi
4 Charlotte Casiraghi
5 Princess Alexandra of Hanover
6 Princess Stephanie of Monaco
7 Louis Ducruet
8 Pauline Ducruet
Alberts 2 children by women he did not marry have no rights of succession to the throne although they will share in his private fortune. The laws on succession to the throne and the laws of inheritance to private wealth are different. The law of succession is part of the constitution.