Search results

this is too small to be useful...

zenobia claimed to be

ming was ruled by zhu. zhou refers to an ancient dynasty that was overthrown around 250 bc

fk: a person can declare himself king regardless of lineage

I could not find how elagabalus was related. please elaborate

jewish ancestry for the merovingians is a recent concoction. other than ethiopia, I am unaware of any descent for the queen

cleopatra did have descendants in mauretania and possibly zenobia

I am also in the us with a documented descent from william i are you considering anyone not living in the uk? if so, people living elsewhere should not respond any further if the answer to the above is yes, how will any interview or gathering of stories be handled?

nepal should not be in a list of descendants of a european ruler

cv: religious figures who claim rulership over spiritual kingdoms are not relevant to this discussion

of all time implies throughout the world and history rather than relatively recently in europe as most of these posts are about my list: sargon I of agade establisher of the first mesopotamian empire asoka of india spread buddhism throughout northern india shi huangdi established the concept...

india is beyond the scope of my article, so, no you might consider researching this and publishing one instead

if anyone is interested in their genealogy as well as other se asian royalty, see my article at: https://www.academia.edu/36824221/A_Genealogy_of_Select_Southeast_Asian_Kingdoms

there is no legitimate dfa from alexander note: I have done extensive research on dfas

she probably isn't

as the original poster of the china link, I since discovered that a correction needs to be made. namely that Abul Melik was Qarim's name after he converted to islam

because it MIGHT be of interest to some

5th dynasty was about a thousand years later

one should be sceptical of connecting any non-biblical family, esp. famous ones to anyone in the bible. as for your book, it may have been written when such connections were standardly made it should be readily available online. however, be sure it's from a site that is properly sourced

Hello: a few problems with your list. japan and cambodia's foundation dates are mythical. the former can be traced reliably to the 3rd or 4th century ad. the later to around 450 ad. there were older kingdoms that later became part of the latter, however, there does not seem to be a generation...

I seriously doubt any arms ascribed to charlemagne is contemporary with him

shang dynasty was established around 1600 bc. by 1000 bc it had been overthrown by the zhou. the latter's founder appointed a shang dynasty prince, duke of song

I am unaware of any king with that name. any idea when he lived?

caliphs only because they took the title from the fatimids

I don't doubt it. however, there is very little documentary evidence for the khazars. and, as we are considering individual beliefs, we will never be certain. I am also aware of early mongol tolerance. however, this became less so after they converted to islsm