Recent content by Elenath

People, like myself, hear about it and follow out of curiosity for the time when content does follow. So when it happens I'll automatically see it in my Insta feed. Makes sense to me.

As far as I know photos were taken by family members and also released by them. You can’t blame the Sussexes for everything. And they can’t prevent the family from taking photos at a private event.

Sadly - in the UK like the US and even here in Australia the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty in a court of law' no longer applies. Legally yes, but if someone I knew had been involved in something like this, I'd would definitely distance myself from that person. Even if there's no...

You have a guy here who is a known sleazebag, who has been friends for a long time with someone who had no problems trafficking minors, wo had no problems having shady financial deals and contacts, but you her questioning her story? Why? If she was told to have sex with him she was probably not...

You need a subscription to read the entire article, which I have. If anyone would like to just PM me.

Not believing a news organisation because it is slightly liberal biased is just silly. Besides: Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER Factual Reporting: HIGH Country: United Kingdom Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Newspaper Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH...

Apparently yes, at least I can't find anything suggesting they aren't. And they are independant. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/byline-times/

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/10/25/exploding-megxit-how-dan-wootton-and-a-cash-for-leaks-scandal-split-the-monarchy/

Are people here seriously saying paps are free to just stalk and chase after famous people and it's "the price of fame"? And it's all good? Several pages ago Marengo said no one was allowed to use this as a stick to beat the Sussexes with. So far that's all I've seen. I've seen people here say...

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/17/americas/harry-meghan-car-crash-intl/index.html

People here defending him?? I left years ago because every breath they take is criticised and only selected (critical) articles are posted. So every now and then I lurk here, read the comments and then I remember why I left....

Imo he (and other famous people) were there to bring attention to the court hearing. The date that was planned by the court and had nothing to do with Charles, William or anyone in the BRF. It would be rediculous if Harry can't go to a court hearing he is a part of because it might conflict with...

You don't get a full picture here at all. From the very beginning the opinion here about Meghan has been mostly negative. It's one of the reasons I am rarely here. I'll get flack for this, but there's a massive double standard here. People have been complaining for years about the BRF and how...

I don't believe that's how she said it. She said Americans have an idea in their heads that's based on medieval imagery and films about that period. So when they (and she meant average American, not royal watchers) imagine curtsying or bowing that's how they imagine it happens. She didn't say it...

You didn't offend (at least not me), I know I'm not really active here anymore but I am elsewhere and I'm getting a bit tired of people accusing Meghan of copying Diana. I mean with all the great fashion Diana wore it's hard NOT to wear something similar.